Chitchat Ho Ching dishing out new advice!

[Pinkieslut]

 

[myfoot123]

The pig once hated human, but after learning to walk on 2-legs, they feel and talk like human. Whore Jinx is one of those pig characters in Animal Farm.

 

[Loofydralb]

The only advise worth listening from her is how to spread your legs for the right spawn.

 

[oliverlee]

The only advise worth listening from her is how to spread your legs for the right spawn.

after that keep spreading for whoever is willing to pour money into that putrid rotten hole

 

[Truthspeak]

The history of Singapore started way before 1819. It was Raffles who represented NWO landed in Singapore. The history of Peranakan also suggested the Chinese riches from China migrated to this tiny island mixing with the Malay natives long before the poor Chinese coolies came to the tiny island for labour and eventually settled in the island

 

[Boonsiong]

Swee

 

[Willamshakespear]

1. Mdm Ho is right in declaring that modern Singapore began in 1819 under Sir Stamford Raffles. She did not deny the existence of this red dot on the map that existed since planet Earth began. The keyword is 'MODERN'


2. During the 11th century or even far back ANCIENT times, when Human population was small, many more adventurous sought to stake out claims on little inhabited land masses. However, the realities are that one or a society can only defend what one owns or wants. Failure to do so would ensure others whom have better talents and might will just take over.


3. In such times, the existing powerful nations were sea-faring, such as Spain, France, England and even China, seeking for RICHES and Dominance of other landmasses. By the 18th century, England - a small island nation - ruled the World, thru its religion, talents, might and democratic system of Rule of Laws, and reaped wealth far far beyond their means from the lush fertile valleys of Asia.


4. If it had not been England, it would had been Spain or France that would rule Asia, and worse, leave no system of Rule of Law, infrastructure, security, etc, etc and critically a common trade lingo used Worldwide unlike the Brits that left a legacy for the World, including even USA.

We Singaporeans may had ended up speaking French, like the Vietnamese whom had been horrifically exploited by France and abandoned after WW2.


5. Our ancient and colonial past will never be denied, as there are good and bad with such systems, and can never be hidden or re-written as based upon ancient records, archeological studies and even physical evidences such as the Hindu SriVijaya empire that ruled Indonesia from Palembang since 7th Century and empire remnants left in Bali, or the lives of the Han Chinese Ming Dynasty descendants in Malaysia.

ULTIMATELY, Singapore IS an INDEPENDENT Nation now, and we TAKE CONTROL over our own DEMOCRATIC destiny, and NOT upon the fate that other nations sought to determine for us.


.

 

[Boonsiong]

Thanks for sharing

 

[po2wq]

y dat ah jinx defends colonisation so vehemently? ... he feel so proud of colonisation meh? ...

wat tis bloke ah jinx describes below about colonisation is precise, 2 ze point n leaves no room 4 ambiguity ...



...

 

[syed putra]

Thais are doing ok without colonialism. But I Believe they engaged European advisors.
Thanks to the two world wars the colonial powers ended up in debt and had to give up their rule. Otherwise, they would still be here. Although it's not such a bad thing.

 

[winnipegjets]

Is Ho Jinx relevant?

 

[Willamshakespear]

y dat ah jinx defends colonisation so vehemently? ... he feel so proud of colonisation meh? ...

wat tis bloke ah jinx describes below about colonisation is precise, 2 ze point n leaves no room 4 ambiguity ...

1. Whom would you rather trust?

a) a comedian whom would have to TWIST realities, to induce an unthoughtful laff from the audience, as a momentary necessary RELIFE from stresses of daily living, in order to earn a living to survive to put food on the table for his loved ones but in the end, when the dawn beckons, his audiences have to wake up and deal with REALITIES of life to put food on the table for their own loved ones,

OR

b)others whom had been educated during their formative years, lived thru REALITIES of life and experiences, to SHARE positiveness of living, not just for the moment but perhaps even for eternity, as no mortal lives forever, but each is not born out of vacuum but with innocent generations to come and help them progress and evolve far better than us?

 

[Truthspeak]

 

[Truthspeak]

y dat ah jinx defends colonisation so vehemently? ... he feel so proud of colonisation meh? ...

wat tis bloke ah jinx describes below about colonisation is precise, 2 ze point n leaves no room 4 ambiguity ...



...

The real people running British Empire were the Jews. Lee serves the Jews.

 

[laksaboy]

Reminder: Ho Ching is full of shit.

 

[laksaboy]

By the way, it is the PAP regime that scuppered the Turf Club and demolished (or planning to demolish) various colonial era buildings, the last vestiges of colonial heritage inherited from the Brits.

Who has the anti-colonial fervour now, hmm?

Keep barking you mad woman. Without opening your legs to you-know-who, you would have been a nobody. Just like your father-in-law had done decades ago, you married up. Deep down inside you know it.

 

[oliverlee]

1. Mdm Ho is right in declaring that modern Singapore began in 1819 under Sir Stamford Raffles. She did not deny the existence of this red dot on the map that existed since planet Earth began. The keyword is 'MODERN'


2. During the 11th century or even far back ANCIENT times, when Human population was small, many more adventurous sought to stake out claims on little inhabited land masses. However, the realities are that one or a society can only defend what one owns or wants. Failure to do so would ensure others whom have better talents and might will just take over.


3. In such times, the existing powerful nations were sea-faring, such as Spain, France, England and even China, seeking for RICHES and Dominance of other landmasses. By the 18th century, England - a small island nation - ruled the World, thru its religion, talents, might and democratic system of Rule of Laws, and reaped wealth far far beyond their means from the lush fertile valleys of Asia.


4. If it had not been England, it would had been Spain or France that would rule Asia, and worse, leave no system of Rule of Law, infrastructure, security, etc, etc and critically a common trade lingo used Worldwide unlike the Brits that left a legacy for the World, including even USA.

We Singaporeans may had ended up speaking French, like the Vietnamese whom had been horrifically exploited by France and abandoned after WW2.


5. Our ancient and colonial past will never be denied, as there are good and bad with such systems, and can never be hidden or re-written as based upon ancient records, archeological studies and even physical evidences such as the Hindu SriVijaya empire that ruled Indonesia from Palembang since 7th Century and empire remnants left in Bali, or the lives of the Han Chinese Ming Dynasty descendants in Malaysia.

ULTIMATELY, Singapore IS an INDEPENDENT Nation now, and we TAKE CONTROL over our own DEMOCRATIC destiny, and NOT upon the fate that other nations sought to determine for us.


.

The claim that “modern Singapore began in 1819 under Raffles” reflects a narrow, colonial-centric view. Long before Raffles, Singapore (then Temasek) was part of thriving regional networks like the Srivijaya and Johor-Riau empires, with evidence of political, commercial, and cultural activity. Labelling 1819 as the singular beginning of "modernity" erases this rich indigenous history.

The argument that territorial control depended on strength — that only those who could defend land deserved to keep it — dangerously justifies colonial conquest as natural or inevitable. This ignores the fact that colonisers often used violence, coercion, and manipulation to overpower established societies.

Britain’s colonial legacy is often romanticised as a provider of the rule of law, infrastructure, and global language, but this overlooks the primary purpose of empire: extraction of wealth and control of trade. Legal systems were designed to serve colonial administration, not uplift local populations. Infrastructure supported resource movement, not regional development. The global spread of English reflects historical domination, not benevolence.

Comparing colonial powers and arguing Singapore was “lucky” to be colonised by Britain rather than France or Spain presents a false binary. Colonialism in all forms imposed suffering, cultural erasure, and loss of autonomy. It’s not a matter of who exploited us “better,” but rather that all colonialism involved subjugation.

While it's true Singapore is now an independent and democratic nation, real independence includes a critical understanding of our entire history — not just the colonial chapters. Precolonial, colonial, and postcolonial experiences all shape who we are. Singapore’s future lies not in glorifying empire, but in acknowledging the complexity of its past and continuing to forge its own plural, self-determined identity.

 

[bobby]

If colonisation is so good why these colonised countries need independence?

The sole purpose of colonisation is to exploit the countries resources for the sole benefit of the crown and their subjects. You would be a fool to think that the masters do it for the “good” of the country.

 

[Papsmearer]

This stupid bitch don't realize that we exchanged British Colonization for an even worse FamiLee Colonization

 

[Truthspeak]

If colonisation is so good why these colonised countries need independence?

The sole purpose of colonisation is to exploit the countries resources for the sole benefit of the crown and their subjects. You would be a fool to think that the masters do it for the “good” of the country.

Colonisation was so good that the people worshipped the western culture and lost their original identity