• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Here is proof that the PAP had planned to cheat

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
27,906
Points
113
While the numbers are said to be fairly indicative of the outcome, the ELD has advised the public to wait for the announcement of the final election results by the Returning Officer, Mr Ng Wai Choong.

On what basis can the Returning Officer conclude that the sample poll is indicative of the outcome? For goodness sake ...it is 100 votes out of tens of thousands of votes! And the Returning Officer is sure that the results will reflect that of the sample vote! Election Department didn't even bother to explain the process of the sample poll.
 
i can only hope this isn't true. if it is cheating and shamelessly rigged. i hope united nations will intervene, then re-election. but... wishfull thinking...
 
On what basis can the Returning Officer conclude that the sample poll is indicative of the outcome? For goodness sake ...it is 100 votes out of tens of thousands of votes! And the Returning Officer is sure that the results will reflect that of the sample vote! Election Department didn't even bother to explain the process of the sample poll.

you must be sleeping all the while
how they did the sample poll was screened and explained in details LIVE
repeatedly....

a loss is a loss
sample or no sample poll
loss is inevitable...

a massive victory for the pap is to be expected
 
you must be sleeping all the while
how they did the sample poll was screened and explained in details LIVE
repeatedly....

a loss is a loss
sample or no sample poll
loss is inevitable...

a massive victory for the pap is to be expected

I heard what was explained.

Question, on what basis did they say that the final count will be within 4% of the sample count? And for all constituencies?

So, they announced the sample count first, and prepare us to accept any final result that is within +/- 4% of the sample count?
 
it's the same anywhere in the first world, especially in the u.s., where broadcast media will jump on any early opportunity to make announcements first....to gain viewership. they rely on early sampling of actual vote counts to predict the outcome. for example, when brown was leading 2 to 1 for the state governor race in the last gubernatorial election early in the morning with only 3% of precincts returning, all news outlet predicted him winning at least 60%. for very close races, such as 51 to 49, it's often too early to call until 80% precincts have reported. final tallies in u.s. elections are typically not completed until months later with all provisional and absentee ballots fully counted. life and governance have to move on, and candidates need to concede asap based on statistical sampling and testicular fortitude.
 
The SDP has not accepted the result.

They have not spoken to the press even when approached.

They are waiting till they have results for all the constituencies that they contest to be announced before they speak to the press.

If the results for a big GRC like Holland Bt Timah has been announced at around midnight when it was around 2 am in the last election, something is fishy.

Can you imagine that the results of HBT GRC is known earlier and the result of Bukit Batok SMC is still not known as of now?
 
1441989464650550.jpg


what happened?

what is happening??

her face speaks volumes....
 
On what basis can the Returning Officer conclude that the sample poll is indicative of the outcome? For goodness sake ...it is 100 votes out of tens of thousands of votes! And the Returning Officer is sure that the results will reflect that of the sample vote! Election Department didn't even bother to explain the process of the sample poll.

Learn to be a good loser. Learn to be a gracious loser. Stop spouting rubbish especially when it's very clear you have absolutely no fucking clue as to what you are talking about.
 
I heard what was explained.

Question, on what basis did they say that the final count will be within 4% of the sample count? And for all constituencies?

So, they announced the sample count first, and prepare us to accept any final result that is within +/- 4% of the sample count?

For fuck sake, the sample count is not going to affect the final count in any way or decide the final results.

If you don't believe it, just wait a couple more hours for the actual results of the complete count.
 
Learn to be a good loser. Learn to be a gracious loser. Stop spouting rubbish especially when it's very clear you have absolutely no fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

Today, I learn something new about you.

I have mistaken you to be an opposition supporter until today.
 
How to get money to pay for all kinds of bullshit like liposuction and slim wraps?

she can slim down a wee bit with natural dieting but doesn't need liposuction and cellophane wraps. with fortitude, she can make a cumback. she just needs to get into the "swing" with swing voters. time to sayang her cheeks.
 
For fuck sake, the sample count is not going to affect the final count in any way or decide the final results.

If you don't believe it, just wait a couple more hours for the actual results of the complete count.

Please do not use the word F*** on me.

The brothers here in this forum know that I do not use profanity and I have never ever used this word on any brother here. So please respect me.

I have my TV live and listening to all the broadcasts even as I am typing in this forum.

Once the returning officer makes an announcement of a winner, it is already considered the final result, do you know that?
 
it's the same anywhere in the first world, especially in the u.s., where broadcast media will jump on any early opportunity to make announcements first....to gain viewership. they rely on early sampling of actual vote counts to predict the outcome. for example, when brown was leading 2 to 1 for the state governor race in the last gubernatorial election early in the morning with only 3% of precincts returning, all news outlet predicted him winning at least 60%. for very close races, such as 51 to 49, it's often too early to call until 80% precincts have reported. final tallies in u.s. elections are typically not completed until months later with all provisional and absentee ballots fully counted. life and governance have to move on, and candidates need to concede asap based on statistical sampling and testicular fortitude.

They don't conclude the result with a count of 100 votes!!!!! 100 votes from 100,000 voters is supposed to predict the outcome is a big joke. Nobody would dare to call the result based on such a SMALL sample.
 
Learn to be a good loser. Learn to be a gracious loser. Stop spouting rubbish especially when it's very clear you have absolutely no fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

My conclusion, this election is stolen. Period.
 
She's wondering now where to get income. WP functions like a real estate company - they provide the WP branding and administrative support to WP candidates during the election. Once the candidate loses, the candidate is on her own. WP will not be able to help her in her daily living from now until the next election.

"how can i afford to have liulian now when mp stipend is no more?" :(
 
They don't conclude the result with a count of 100 votes!!!!! 100 votes from 100,000 voters is supposed to be predict the outcome is a big joke. Nobody would dare to call the result based on such a SMALL sample.

who says "conclude"? they predict. i've been through over presidential election cycles in the u.s. as a qualified voting station inspector and leader, and i know what i'm talking about. as voluntary election workers every 4 years, we don't jump to conclusions and cannot watch tv during the day of voting, but on alternate election cycles (2-year and 4-year) for local, state and county races when we don't work as election workers, we know who will be winning based on news outlets using statistical sampling early in the morning after 9am. the randomness of voter arrivals at the booths, even in the first hour, provides a relatively accurate prediction of the outcome. the only exception that i know of when early sampling bucked the trend towards the end was the measure for willie brown's pet project in sf to build a ballpark. it was losing early but somehow at the 11th hour found thousands of "uncounted" votes to tip the balance towards victory. that i suspect to this day was a possible case of ballot stuffing. and willie brown the former sf mayor has been known to find sudden sufficient votes in unexpected circumstances in many of his races.
 
Today, I learn something new about you.

I have mistaken you to be an opposition supporter until today.

I have been a PAP secret mole all my life. My PAP code number for secret communications with the PAP HQ is TP010K.
 
Back
Top