Hello, can you all stop this woffling sceptism please?

[Confuseous]

Why are there so many skepticism and criticism about the Woffles case? The law is the law. The Law Minister has explained it clearly on the technical aspects of the law and why it was administered that way. The AGC has also done the unusual, to explain the legality and correctness of the law. The Sinkies should be very grateful that the AGC was kind enough to explain the position to show how fair and proper is our legal system. There is absolutely no favouritism or any undoings.

Now, would Sinkies just accept that it is the law, simple and clear, fair and just? How could laypeople question the legality of the law when the two most authoritative person and body in charge with administering justice in the country have already said that it was right and proper? So what if senior counsels also have their doubts?

Sinkies must accept the law of the country. This country is ruled by the rule of law. And when the law says so, it says so. Let’s move on and let the good surgeon go about with his practice to make many more beautiful people happy. And good thing nobody was hurt.

And like all fairy tales, they all lived happily ever after. A happy ending. Won’t that be nice?

http://mysingaporenews.blogspot.sg/2012/06/sinkies-are-getting-naughty.html? utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+MySingaporeNews+(My+Singapore+News)

 

[Narong Wongwan]

yes move on!
no wonder FTs snatched all you sinkies jobs away....knn so free kpkp...time should be spent being productive....
the cab drivers can use this time to pick up more passengers........the aunties can collect more drink cans and cardboard.........the senior citizens can sell more tissue during the time spent kpkb about WW

 

[Balls2U]

Screw the law! A law may have legal force, but that doesn't mean that it is just and fair. Even Nazis have a set of laws, but it's pure evil and lop-sided!

 

[god_zeus]

if u cant trust the police, judge, PAP, AGC, Law minister..
who can you trust?

 

[Balls2U]

if u cant trust the police, judge, pap, agc, law minister..
Who can you trust?

myself!!!!

 

[Confuseous]

Woffles Wu case hits a nerve

It is possible that the issue will be weighed down by legal technicalities in any further discussion. If so, this may miss the real issue. The reason netizens took interest in the case was because it resonated with a widespread feeling that there is one law for the rich and powerful and another for ordinary blokes. (And I might add: a third law for political opponents.) Explaining the technicalities is not going to convince people otherwise.

Compounding the problem is that the explanation itself begs additional questions. Choo Zheng Xi pointing out contradictions is one, and it will cement that notion that the AGC’s statement was more whitewash than explanation.

Moreover, I found this sentence in the AGC’s statement very curious: “Woffles Wu, who did not give any information to the police . . .” As The Online Citizen reader Guan Kiat Chua wrote, Wu would have been obliged under the law to provide information about the person driving the vehicle within 7 days:

- http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/woffles-wu-case-hits-a-nerve/

 

[Lee5604]

Re: Woffles Wu case hits a nerve

It is possible that the issue will be weighed down by legal technicalities in any further discussion. If so, this may miss the real issue. The reason netizens took interest in the case was because it resonated with a widespread feeling that there is one law for the rich and powerful and another for ordinary blokes. (And I might add: a third law for political opponents.) Explaining the technicalities is not going to convince people otherwise.

Compounding the problem is that the explanation itself begs additional questions. Choo Zheng Xi pointing out contradictions is one, and it will cement that notion that the AGC’s statement was more whitewash than explanation.

Moreover, I found this sentence in the AGC’s statement very curious: “Woffles Wu, who did not give any information to the police . . .” As The Online Citizen reader Guan Kiat Chua wrote, Wu would have been obliged under the law to provide information about the person driving the vehicle within 7 days:

- http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/woffles-wu-case-hits-a-nerve/

Well said and you hit the nail on the head!