• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Guess! Whore who cannot be named accused doctor of molest, found not guilty!

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
Doctor acquitted of molesting patient, judge points to unconvincing and inconsistent testimony
Dr Lui Weng Sun is accused of molesting a female patient. (Photo: Najeer Yusof/TODAY)
By Lydia Lam@LydiaLamCNA
08 Mar 2021 10:31AM(Updated: 08 Mar 2021 10:40AM)
Bookmark


lui_weng_sun_1.jpg

家庭医生吕荣山被判无罪释放。(档案照片)

SINGAPORE: A 48-year-old doctor was acquitted on Monday (Mar 8) of molesting a 24-year-old female patient in his clinic, with the judge finding the woman's testimony inconsistent and unconvincing.

She did not find the woman's evidence to be "unusually convincing", and found her boyfriend's behaviour in approaching the doctor "highly unusual".

Dr Lui Weng Sun had contested one charge of molesting the Vietnamese national at Northeast Medical Group clinic in Block 39 Jalan Tiga on Nov 6, 2017.

The woman claimed he had pulled down her bra cup, placed a stethoscope on her breast and touched her breast area.

According to the woman's boyfriend, Dr Lui had said he needed to "check the things inside" such as the liver, lungs and heart. The boyfriend later made a police report.

Dr Lui, who was defended by a team of lawyers led by Mr Shashi Nathan, called the allegations "outrageous" and "ridiculous", saying that he "definitely did not do it" and that he would "never molest patients".

According to Dr Lui, the woman's boyfriend called him afterwards and said things like: "I don't know about you doctors, you have money and lawyers, and (I'm) also afraid of threatening you."

READ: Doctor on trial for molesting woman calls allegations 'outrageous'

Dr Lui claimed that the boyfriend wanted compensation and said: "To me, this is a small matter, but to you, it's a very big matter."

JUDGE EXPLAINS CONTRADICTIONS IN TESTIMONY

District Judge Jasvender Kaur on Monday said she found the woman's evidence "confusing and contradictory" in some parts. She gave differing accounts of what allegedly happened in her police statements and in court.
In her police statements, the woman said Dr Lui had pulled her shirt up once, but said this was two times when testifying in court.

She also did not say in her police statements that a clinic assistant had opened the door during her consultation. She said in court at first that the assistant had knocked, but when confronted with evidence that she did not, she said she heard a knock.
She also did "a sudden about turn" when questioned in court if she was sure that Dr Lui had placed his stethoscope above her breast after the assistant left the room, and changed her evidence to say she could not recall.
Referring to her testimony that Dr Lui had lifted her shirt twice, the judge said: "I fail to see why she could not give a consistent version in the police statement."
Another inconsistency was in relation to the woman's bra cup. She said in court that the bra cup was turned downwards before she was molested, but had told the police that her bra was pulled down.
The police officer testified that the woman had not told him the bra cup was turned outwards, instead using both hands to gesture that her bra was pulled down.
"If only one bra cup was turned upwards to expose her breast, the complainant could have done this to show (the officer). There's no explanation why she described it with an inconsistent gesture," said the judge.
She added that she failed to see why the woman's boyfriend had to further engage with Dr Lui after calling him once. During his second phone call, he told Dr Lui that the police may not let the matter go even if they settled it privately.
"He said this matter 'affects you greatly but does not matter to us'," said Judge Kaur. "(He said) 'you should know very well this matter affects you doctors greatly'. He knew the stakes were high for the accused."
"I find his conduct to want to engage with the accused after the first call highly unusual," she said.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Until you punish those wimmin who made false accusations, this 'Me Too' nonsense will continue. Inside offices, clinics, schools, gyms, spas etc. Eventually Kelantan-style sexual segregation will be necessary for companies and institutions to protect themselves legally.

$10k fine and/or up to 3 years in jail for a first-time offender, that should be about enough deterrence for those toxic cunts with daddy issues. :cool:
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nowadays they use ultrasound. No more stethoscope.can place the gadget anywhere they like and not confined to just the breast.
 

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
Until you punish those wimmin who made false accusations, this 'Me Too' nonsense will continue. Inside offices, clinics, schools, gyms, spas etc. Eventually Kelantan-style sexual segregation will be necessary for companies and institutions to protect themselves legally.

$10k fine and/or up to 3 years in jail for a first-time offender, that should be about enough deterrence for those toxic cunts with daddy issues. :cool:

These whores must be stripped naked and made to do the slut walk.
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
KNN acquitted and not protected big big face posted while accuser identity protected ? KNN jibye is indeed much more expensive than lanjiao KNN
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Doctor acquitted of molesting patient, judge points to unconvincing and inconsistent testimony
Dr Lui Weng Sun is accused of molesting a female patient. (Photo: Najeer Yusof/TODAY)
By Lydia Lam@LydiaLamCNA
08 Mar 2021 10:31AM(Updated: 08 Mar 2021 10:40AM)
Bookmark


lui_weng_sun_1.jpg

家庭医生吕荣山被判无罪释放。(档案照片)

SINGAPORE: A 48-year-old doctor was acquitted on Monday (Mar 8) of molesting a 24-year-old female patient in his clinic, with the judge finding the woman's testimony inconsistent and unconvincing.

She did not find the woman's evidence to be "unusually convincing", and found her boyfriend's behaviour in approaching the doctor "highly unusual".

Dr Lui Weng Sun had contested one charge of molesting the Vietnamese national at Northeast Medical Group clinic in Block 39 Jalan Tiga on Nov 6, 2017.

The woman claimed he had pulled down her bra cup, placed a stethoscope on her breast and touched her breast area.

According to the woman's boyfriend, Dr Lui had said he needed to "check the things inside" such as the liver, lungs and heart. The boyfriend later made a police report.

Dr Lui, who was defended by a team of lawyers led by Mr Shashi Nathan, called the allegations "outrageous" and "ridiculous", saying that he "definitely did not do it" and that he would "never molest patients".

According to Dr Lui, the woman's boyfriend called him afterwards and said things like: "I don't know about you doctors, you have money and lawyers, and (I'm) also afraid of threatening you."

READ: Doctor on trial for molesting woman calls allegations 'outrageous'

Dr Lui claimed that the boyfriend wanted compensation and said: "To me, this is a small matter, but to you, it's a very big matter."

JUDGE EXPLAINS CONTRADICTIONS IN TESTIMONY

District Judge Jasvender Kaur on Monday said she found the woman's evidence "confusing and contradictory" in some parts. She gave differing accounts of what allegedly happened in her police statements and in court.
In her police statements, the woman said Dr Lui had pulled her shirt up once, but said this was two times when testifying in court.

She also did not say in her police statements that a clinic assistant had opened the door during her consultation. She said in court at first that the assistant had knocked, but when confronted with evidence that she did not, she said she heard a knock.
She also did "a sudden about turn" when questioned in court if she was sure that Dr Lui had placed his stethoscope above her breast after the assistant left the room, and changed her evidence to say she could not recall.
Referring to her testimony that Dr Lui had lifted her shirt twice, the judge said: "I fail to see why she could not give a consistent version in the police statement."
Another inconsistency was in relation to the woman's bra cup. She said in court that the bra cup was turned downwards before she was molested, but had told the police that her bra was pulled down.
The police officer testified that the woman had not told him the bra cup was turned outwards, instead using both hands to gesture that her bra was pulled down.
"If only one bra cup was turned upwards to expose her breast, the complainant could have done this to show (the officer). There's no explanation why she described it with an inconsistent gesture," said the judge.
She added that she failed to see why the woman's boyfriend had to further engage with Dr Lui after calling him once. During his second phone call, he told Dr Lui that the police may not let the matter go even if they settled it privately.
"He said this matter 'affects you greatly but does not matter to us'," said Judge Kaur. "(He said) 'you should know very well this matter affects you doctors greatly'. He knew the stakes were high for the accused."
"I find his conduct to want to engage with the accused after the first call highly unusual," she said.

Excellent judge!
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wat is the penalty for false accusations? False police reports? Is it a crime ? N can the doctor launched a defamation suit?
 

Balls2U

Alfrescian
Loyal
This doctor has the cash to engage a good lawyer to defend him. Sashi Nathan is well known in the Criminal law circle and a disciple of the late Subhas Anandan.
 

mixmasternrv

Alfrescian
Loyal
if viet appeal and lose, her identity should be revealed to the public.
ALL females who falsely accuse men of such charges MUST be identified. I mean the guy's reputation and family etc are so adversely affected by these false charges so even if found innocent by a court the stain will be on them forever. And these bitches are free to live their lives? Where is the equality or justice in that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jw5

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
ALL females who falsely accuse men of such charges MUST be identified. I mean the guy's reputation and family etc are so adversely affected by these false charges so even if found innocent by a court the stain will be on them forever. And these bitches are free to live their lives? Where is the equality or justice in that?

Absolutely agree and I am with you on this. :thumbsup:
 
Top