• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Guess Race? Boss Raped Chiobu Maid!

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
18,028
Points
113
Employer who raped maid sentenced to 13 years’ jail, caning

The victim, a Myanmar national, was raped twice by her employer Chin Swee Chung while the latter's wife and children were away on holiday.

SINGAPORE: A 46-year-old man was on Monday (Nov 14) sentenced to 13 years’ jail and 20 strokes of the cane for raping his domestic helper twice in five hours in December 2013, while his wife and children were away on holiday.

Malaysian Chin Swee Chung claimed the Myanmar national, 35, was a willing party. The victim however testified that she cried and struggled to get away but was overpowered by Chin on both occasions.

He was found guilty of two counts of rape in September, after a seven-day trial.

Chin, who worked in Singapore for an alcohol distribution company, returned home in the wee hours of Dec 20, intoxicated after a night out drinking with friends. He called out to the victim, who was asleep, to wake her up and when she emerged from her room – separated from the rest of the house by a curtain – he pulled her into the master bedroom, pinned her down and raped her.

At about 7am, more than four hours after the first rape, Chin woke up to find the domestic helper working in the kitchen. He pulled her into his bedroom and raped her again.

“The victim was forced to undergo the full gamut of emotional turmoil and trauma ensuing from such a visceral violation of her personal integrity not once but twice; the second time was even more cruel, as it was committed with the victim’s full and fresh awareness of what had been done to her only hours earlier,” Deputy Public Prosecutor Kumaresan Gohubalan told the court.

The woman’s friend, whom she called for help after Chin had left the house to go work, said she was crying so hard she was barely able to speak. He told the woman to call the police, which she did. Chin was arrested shortly after.

The prosecution pressed for a sentence of 15 years’ jail and 24 strokes of the cane, citing aggravating factors such as Chin being the woman’s employer. “He was able to gain access to her and prey on her at a vulnerable time – in the wee hours of the morning and with no one around for her to seek assistance from," DPP Kumaresan said.

The helper was “violated in the sanctity of a household she would have regarded as a workplace, shelter and abode”, he added, and by claiming trial to the charges, Chin had forced the woman “to come face-to-face with her rapist, relive the horror of her experiences and to undergo the rigours of cross-examination”.

Chin’s lawyers Sunil Sudheesan and Diana Ngiam argued for the court to sentence Chin to 11 years’ jail and 12 strokes of the cane.

Mr Sudheesan said Chin’s actions are “a massive departure” from his usual self, pointing to several testimonials from colleagues and friends, which “speak consistently of a non-violent man who is hardworking, honest and trustworthy”.

Justice Chan Seng Onn, in sentencing Chin, said while the man’s actions are “reprehensible”, “the manner in which you committed the rape did not involve violence of the type that would have significantly enhanced your sentence”.

Mr Sudheesan said he would be appealing Chin’s conviction and sentence, and the latter is on bail of S$70,000 pending the appeal hearing.

For rape, the 46-year-old could have been jailed for up to 20 years per charge and caned.
 
He promised her $200 after a fuck, but her performance is C50.
Sue him for rape. :rolleyes:
 
This is what happen when you worship pussy.. Another pussy worshipping related crime.

If you go MGTOW, you will have freedom and life.
 
Whose fault?
It is the government for allowing Malaysian and
Other roaches in.
Will ica revoke this beast PR.n sent it back to Penang
 
The Myanmar national arrived in Singapore in September 2012 and worked for her first employer until June 2013.But she later ran away and lodged a complaint to Singapore's Ministry of Manpower.When Mr Sudheesan asked why, she said: "There was not enough food and sleep and there was outstanding salary."The maid did not reveal in court the outcome of her complaint -

http://news.asiaone.com/news/crime/...laims-sex-was-consensual#sthash.VGspAiyH.dpuf

Moral of story-check track record carefully and beware of recycled maid-who runs to complain even minor problems to MOM.

I also do not have enough food and sleep very often during training in NS-who do I complain to ?
 
What the fuck kind of court case is this? The maid said he raped her. He said he did not, it was consensual sex. Basically, its his word against hers. Unless there was a rape test done on the maid and they found the employer's sperm in her pussy, and evidence of vaginal bruising and other evidence of forced sex, there is no fucking case at all. The fucking useless DPP has presented no evidence of rape other then what she said. Like that who wants to hire a maid? If i have a maid in my home, and one day she report to the police I raped her and gave some cock and bull story, like that I can go to jail for no fucking reason even though there is no evidence that I did it. This is kangaroo court system at its best.
 
Maybe chinese cunt no good. No feeling. Need to see if myanmar one better.
 
What the fuck kind of court case is this? The maid said he raped her. He said he did not, it was consensual sex. Basically, its his word against hers. Unless there was a rape test done on the maid and they found the employer's sperm in her pussy, and evidence of vaginal bruising and other evidence of forced sex, there is no fucking case at all. The fucking useless DPP has presented no evidence of rape other then what she said. Like that who wants to hire a maid? If i have a maid in my home, and one day she report to the police I raped her and gave some cock and bull story, like that I can go to jail for no fucking reason even though there is no evidence that I did it. This is kangaroo court system at its best.

What do you expect? That is why the trial-by-jury system is the norm in most developed countries. Even Japan re-adopted this system in 2009. South Korean also adoped it in limited form in 2014.
 
What do you expect? That is why the trial-by-jury system is the norm in most developed countries. Even Japan re-adopted this system in 2009. South Korean also adoped it in limited form in 2014.

This kind of kangaroo system is ridiculous. If it was a PAP MP accused of rape, the DPP will say no evidence and dismiss the case. In fact, police would not even charge the MP. there is no justice in singapore when the system us open to abuse and subjectiveness.
 
Back
Top