• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Govt to raise CPF employer contribution by 1% to make MSL premiums 'affordable'

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Health Minister Gan Kim Yong yesterday reassured Singaporeans that they do not need to worry about being unable to afford the projected increase in premiums for the new MediShield Life plan.

He said the 1 percentage point increase in employer contribution to Medisave will be enough to offset the rise in premiums for most upper middle-income families.

Middle- and lower-income families will also have no problems as they will get permanent government subsidies.

And for anyone else who may "fall through the cracks", the Government will work out a special scheme to help them, he promised.

MediShield Life is a compulsory scheme that will provide medical insurance for everyone for life - including those already sick - when it starts at the end of next year.

Details of the scheme's enhanced benefits and wider coverage were announced by the MediShield Life Review Committee last Thursday, but there has been no news yet on exactly how much the premiums will cost.

Yesterday, Mr Gan gave some indication, saying that for those earning at least $5,000 - the income cap for calculating Central Provident Fund contributions - the additional 1 percentage point Medisave contribution will provide $600 a year. This will be enough to cover the increase in premiums for most families in that income bracket, he said.

Last Thursday, it was announced that there will be permanent subsidies for two out of three households, and transitional subsidies for everyone for four years. The transitional subsidy starts at 80 per cent of the premium increase in the first year, dropping to 60 per cent, 40 per cent and 20 per cent over the following four years.

"Because this is a very major shift in the health-care financing framework, the Government is committed to providing sufficient help and support," said Mr Gan, who spoke on the sidelines of an event to celebrate World Blood Donor Day at Sentosa.

"The idea is to help as many people as we can."

Mr Gan also praised the review committee for its "very impactful" suggestions, such as the removal of the lifetime cap so people will not have to worry about running out of insurance coverage; raising the claims limit so patients can make larger claims; and reducing the co-payment so patients bear a smaller part of big bills.

He expressed his gratitude to the 11-member committee headed by former managing director of accounting giant KPMG, Mr Bobby Chin, who "burned the midnight oil" on many occasions to come up with recommendations that struck a balance between enhancing benefits and maintaining affordability.

The final report from the committee will be submitted to the Government at the end of this month and be debated in Parliament next month.

The minister noted it is important for the economy to continue growing strongly so that there will be enough resources to provide these MediShield Life subsidies.

As to whether people should give up their Integrated Shield plans - which cover more than standard subsidised care and cost more - the minister said people will have to make that decision carefully.

He added: "They will have to consider the cost of coverage and the additional premiums, not just when they are young, but... when they get older."

[email protected]
 

Cerebral

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
So strange that the example he gave was for someone with income of 5k. 5k is the cpf cap and is he basing his increases on the top range? The average wage is 2+k, shouldn't the example be based on that?
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Note the words: UPPER MIDDLE INCOME FAMILIES

So that means income (dual or not) more than 10K per month which 1% increase is enough to cover ( of course lah Gan, which dip shit in primary school Maths do not know if the principle amount is high any percentage of it will be more, you think Sinkie did not do Maths is it?)

Does ordinary Sinkie earn that much?

Of course Gan the ass hole was still thinking how much the Sinkie have to pay on his own and none of this premium must come from him and these payments will go on to increase all his crony hospitals intake!

Fantastic.
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
On paper, it sounds reasonable. But in reality, the 1% will go into the CPF ACCOUNT, not as cash. So, more money for Madam to play Monopoly with.
And you can be sure that the extra 1% that the employers are coughing out (with their blood) will be taken into consideration when the employee's next increment comes about - IF there is an increment.

All the schemes that this idiot Gan is spilling out double confirm what Uncle Leong has always said - the govt does NOT spend on healthcare for the citizens. They would rather buy a few more fighter planes.
 

ykhuser

Alfrescian
Loyal
siao liao lah.
next year increment will be less 1 %.
indirectly the 60% are not smart enough to know they are screwed.they are paying the 1% not the employer
 

cunnilaubu

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
So strange that the example he gave was for someone with income of 5k. 5k is the cpf cap and is he basing his increases on the top range? The average wage is 2+k, shouldn't the example be based on that?

5K is derisory, according to the PM. So no big deal. :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
 

Jemini

Alfrescian
Loyal
When they said time and again not to worry, Sinkies better jagar their backside and be very worried instead.
 
Top