• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Govt agency should handle resale flat sale

pocoyo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Govt agency should handle resale flat sale

Posted by luxuryasiahome on October 31, 2009

DAVID Lawrence has a suggestion for dealing with the problem of rogue housing agents whom the government is trying to rein in: by introducing legislation.

Either the Ministry of National Development or Housing and Development Board could set up a separate statutory body and give it exclusive rights to deal in resale HDB flats, he says.

Such legislation may be difficult to apply retroactively for the existing flats, he notes. But when HDB sells new flats, it could write in the agreement that when the lessees wish to re-sell their flats after the five-year minimum occupation period, they will have to go through the new stat body.

‘If you wish to sell your flat, all you’ll have to do is to list it with this new stat body,’ Mr Lawrence, who is chief executive of Wheelock Properties (Singapore), told BT in a recent interview. ‘The new body would not have to be involved in the pricing. People can put their own price, as in a free market. If it doesn’t sell within three months, then they’ve priced it too high,’ he said.

The proposed new stat body would employ agents who have been screened and found suitable. ‘The commission charges could be low but it will still pay for this stat body to handle all these sales,’ Mr Lawrence said.

The body would have an approved panel of lawyers and valuers with all money going through proper controls, he suggested. ‘That will cut out crooked agents ripping off some of the old people on HDB estates and taking double fees. I don’t agree with all that nonsense.’

According to Mr Lawrence, since HDB built and sold the flats, he sees no reason why a public sector body such as the one he is suggesting should not be sole agent for their resale.

On another front, Mr Lawrence says he is not alarmed by the recent increase in HDB’s resale flat price index. Viewed over a 10-year period, the index has risen 34 per cent, which works out to an average increase of 3.4 per cent per annum. He describes this as ‘fairly gentle capital appreciation’ that is good for the 82 per cent of the population that live in HDB flats.

Source : Business Times – 31 Oct 2009
 

downgrader

Alfrescian
Loyal
good idea, don't forgetthe MIKE PARIKH and ERA case

era-zaobaobryanvanderbeek.jpg


http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking+News/Singapore/Story/STIStory_334920.html

Two ERA agents were slammed by High Court Judge Choo Han Teck for their unethical behaviour in the transaction of a two-bedroom downtown flat.

Mr Yuen Chow Hin, an IT company vice-president, and his wife, Madam Wong Wai Fan, a housewife, had let go of their two-bedroom downtown flat at $688,000. They took their ERA agent's word that this was the best price they could get.

What they did not know was that the buyer of their Riverside Piazza unit was the wife of their agent's boss, and that she re-sold it almost immediately for $945,000, making a hefty profit.

On Thursday, Justice Choo ruled in favour of the Yuens, who had sued ERA for the 'secret profit' made in the second deal.

The judge found that the conduct of agent Jeremy Ang and his boss, Mr Mike Parikh, senior group division director at ERA, amounted to breach of duty and fraud. He also had a stern reminder for the industry of its ethical responsibilities, as it had emerged in court that such practices were common.

The judge concluded that it was Mr Parikh who wanted to buy the flat in order to make a quick profit during the property boom. To distance himself from the deal, he used his wife, Madam Natassha Sadiq, as the buyer and Mr Ang as the seller's agent, the judge found.

Mr Ang was the link but Mr Parikh was the person behind the scheme, and his position made his subordinate's breach of contract even more reprehensible. The misconduct was of such magnitude that the judge said he felt bound to make the reasons clear in his judgment so that no property agent could now claim ignorance.

'When a property agent is engaged to sell or buy property, he has a responsibility to act in the interests of the person who appointed him - not his own, or his friends', or his relatives' or his boss', said the judge. 'This responsibility that the agent bears is the foundation of the ethical rules and contractual principles that prohibit an agent from acting in conflict of interests and reaping secret profits for himself or his friends.'
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
David Law Lan...is 'chap chye', 'kek ling' or JEW?

certainly sound like one, with a 'fork tongue'....:biggrin:
 

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Merchant Lawrence loves peasants to incur debts to purchase his wares. That is his goal. Of course, he love high pigeonhole prices, that will give him more leeway to price his wares on the high side.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
How ironic that in a country where so many complain bitterly about the omnipresence of the govt in their daily lives, there are regular calls for more govt control.
 
Top