• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Government suck S$6 billion from you guys!!!

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
10,338
Points
113
Government set to post S$6 billion in budget surplus
By Faris – January 13th, 2011
http://sg.yfittopostblog.com/2011/01/13/government-set-to-post-s6-billion-in-budget-surplus/

A whopping S$6 billion in budget surplus; that is the amount the government is set to gain after a buoyant economy boosted tax collections last year.

This comes after private economists say that the country could post record revenues hitting as high as S$50 billion, an increase from S$38 billion in 2009. They attribute this to factors such as solid wage growth, strong corporate profits and a sizzling property market.

A surplus is the left over amount from state revenues after taking into account all government spending. A deficit is where there is a shortfall.

Speaking to The Straits Times on Tuesday, Bank of America Merrill Lynch economist Chua Hak Bin and DBS economist Irvin Seah expect the budget surplus to hit a bumper $6 billion.

This is a dramatic reversal from an official government estimate of a S$3 billion deficit, made in February last year. “The booming economy bumped up corporate and personal income taxes, which saw much higher collections compared with the government’s estimates,” said Dr Chua.

Gaming taxes and duties from the integrated resorts are expected to add S$1.1 billion to government coffers, he added. Mr Seah weighed in that the strong property market has also contributed to higher revenues.

They also said that this year, the government could have a considerable war chest for helping people. Especially in assisting the lower-income earners cope with the effects of rising consumer prices.

Other economists, such as OCBC’s Selena Ling and Citigroup’s Kit Wei Zheng, expect government revenues to significantly beat official estimates of S$40.7 billion.

“This pattern of budget conservatism versus actual fiscal outperformance has been a recurrent theme in the past five years,” noted Mr Kit.

If the economy does post an estimated S$6 billion surplus, it would be the second-highest in the last decade and is just short of the S$7.6 billion surplus recorded in 2007.

On the other hand, Dr Chua anticipates that the next general election will be called soon after the Budget – due some time next month – making the next announcement a notable one.

This is because, under the constitution, the government is required to balance the budget books for its entire term, which began in 2007. Savings and surpluses over the term of government will be locked up as past reserves at term-end.

In contrast, any deficits incurred overall will be considered a drawdown on past reserves which can be done only with the president’s consent.

The net position over the past four years could be an overall surplus of S$9 billion to S$12 billion, depending on the final fiscal figures released, said Mr Kit.

“The government can draw down on this term’s past surpluses to announce a generous Budget this time, if it wants to,” he said.

But what is certain is that the money will go towards tackling the income gap and the higher inflation that is expected this year.

Dr Chua also expects that in the Budget, the government will hand out one-off goodies, such as Central Provident Fund (CPF) top-ups and utility and property tax rebates.

But he doubts that the government will give permanent cuts to income and corporate taxes saying this will impact the fiscal positions in the years ahead.

However, economists such as Mr Seah and Ms Ling said the government may want to return the S$4.9 billion it drew down from past reserves in 2009 to pay for the Jobs Credit Scheme.

Due to the effects of the global financial crisis, the government scheme paid for a portion of a local worker’s salary in order to save jobs.

“They don’t have to as it is not a loan. But even if they do, there will be plenty of money left,” said Ms Ling.

==============================================

Remember, that's the amount of tax collected from you.
 
Don't worry the PAP MPs will know what to do with their fat bonuse$$$:(

Maybe that's why we haven't seen LKY around, probably shopping for a new coffin & headstone.:rolleyes:
 
"Sir, if you have a milkshake and I have a milkshake and my straw reaches across the room, I'll end up drinking your milkshake." - Senator Albert Fall


<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RKQ3LXHKB34?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RKQ3LXHKB34?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
 
They put out this news to justify their big pay rise which they will announce before the election. Mark my words.
 
High time to cut GST !!!

Would you say no to easy money:confused:

That will never happen without external pressures e.g. more opposition.

PAP has gotten addicted to $$$. There is always some bigger project for them to squander public funds on, bigger bonuses, more lavish junketts,....
 
They put out this news to justify their big pay rise which they will announce before the election. Mark my words.

Not likely. They have enough issues to deal with before GE. But once re-elected, it's a sure bet they will up their pay.
 
All these money could have been put to better use had it stayed with the private sector. They can expand their businesses, hire more workers. The private citizen could have save up to invest or start up their own business ventures. Instead, all these money are wasted on cost centers like civil servants, projects like dig up the road, then cover it back only to be dig up again and so on. The so called HDB upgrades, what REAL wealth did it create? Note that properties are highly inflated as property like cars, and machineries, should have depreciating values as it gets older. What's more, most property has a time expiration date.

Realize that the bigger the government, the more tax you will have to pay and the lesser freedom you will have as they have more control over every expect of your lives.

Like how they tell you what you can or cannot do with your money (CPF). What language you can use or cannot use, etc...
 
projects like dig up the road, then cover it back only to be dig up again and so on.

You notice they ask the contractors to
synchronise digging at around the
same place everywhere .

They want people to see Singapore
has lots of jams and is a very busy place .
 
You notice they ask the contractors to
synchronise digging at around the
same place everywhere .

They want people to see Singapore
has lots of jams and is a very busy place .


If Spore is so well planned why should there be a need for so many fixer up projects:confused:

I think alot of the work we see being done is unnecessary & each time they are sucking up alot of taxpayers$ money. Suspect much of the work is being done by "members" with connections :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top