good reasoning to failed policies

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
15,744
Points
83
everyone must learn this secret of wriggling out of a failed policy by skilful (or rather lame) reasoning. if it's good enough to convince and con the nation, u r a successful shrewd politician which sgp no doubt has plenty of these bunch of jokers.

Saturday, September 17, 2011
LKY, the two-child policy and the ageing population.

Lee Kuan Yew(LKY), the two child policy and the ageing population!
.by Patrick Lee Song Juan on Thursday, September 15, 2011 at 12:11am.

"The policy to encourage families to stop at two children in the late 60s "had nothing" to do with Singapore's current ageing population and low fertility rate, said former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew on Wednesday.

Now LKY is at it again to justify his failed policy of stopping at two. In 2003, when I was with Joo Chiat CC and during one of a dialogue session with grassroots with then minister-of-state Chan Soo Sen for Education, I asked whether the two child policy would one day caused a' population deficit' affecting S'pore's demographic !?

A tell-tail sign was emerging and foreigners were streaming in at a steady pace but not that tragic till this present moment of foreigner-infested S'pore. Chan tried to explain that those years due to the economic and S'pore's position and was still a young nation, a population explosion would cripple S'pore's many resources and infrastructure and if the economy then could not substain a great population increased, S'pore will suffer in many aspect . Fair answer! A short term solution to a long term disaster.

Forty-five years down the road, with the government's too far-sightedness, now citizens are suffering the indignity of a land we do not really call our own and we do not have more family members to share the responsibilities of caring for our aged parents.And behold! medical expenses had hit the roof...the popular jargon among poor citizens is " better die than fall sick and hospitalised." S'pore have progressed to First World country..but many of our poor and destitute are surviving on third world crumbs. Only the government and its ministers are first world Swiss standard high and mighty people living on the taxes of its citizens.

And in come the younger scholars of PAP, who rode the high wave into PAP stardom and ministership!..Singapore has changed to be so cold-blooded in many areas, though there are still the compassion showed by many well-wishers and charities for the poor and deprived. The government is not doing enough and all they want is the bottomline..to satisfy their high salary. The old age citizens are suffering for better care..The small family of one/two siblings are stretched to the limit of its tensile strength. IMH (Institute of Mental Health) is a welcome home for many stressed and depressed citizens..OMG!

Please give your take. I for one think the stop at two policy with the obstacles curtailing people with penalties if they have more children was a real bad policy, tantamount to threats on couples who want more children. Ageing population is a natural process of human life cycle. But if we did not stop at two and government did not impose such stringent penalties...Many of us would like to have at least 3 or 4 children...and from the 60s to now, we would have more or less a balance demographics of young and old age.

Please sir, do not stir up a controversial policy again.

patrick lee song juan
 
those who were born in the baby boomers era, wonder how were their siblings being ostracised should there be accidental birth after STOP AT 2, i.e, no stopping at 2 but ended with 4 or 5 or even more :p

i believe many parents then were put into much distress and anxiety about how would their #3 child born would have to go through. it was a no mercy from the gov then.

and now, the retribulation haunts us. the nation now suffers fr negative population growth. sgp - a country without resources but only humans to carry on the survival was victim of a failed policy then.

i wouldn't be surprised one day true blue singaporeans would be the minority and pirated naturalised singaporeans form the majority. from there on, u can bet ur arse that pap shall remain in power with those pirated singaporeans voting them in as an obligation rather than a personal choice. :(
 
so in sgp if any policy were to fail, just think of a good reasoning and guarantee there shall be no head roll. learn this survival feat and one would climb the bureaucracy ladder safe and fast.
 
i m now very anxious about the failure of CPF. gov keeps changing the rules and conditions for retirement withdrawal. something's not very right. they are now telling and i m perspiring whether i could get to see my cpf saving soon :(

now they called it "fine tuning". later i wonder what kind of reason would they wriggle out to con and convince the entire nation.
 
It is always easier to see back in hind sight.. The policies were good then and bad now.. not because of the rulers..
but because of the blind people who obeyed them subserviently all these years..
 
Last edited:
It is always easier to see back in hind sight.. The policies were good then and bad now.. not because of the rulers..
but because of the blind people who obeyed them subserviently all these years..

the obedience and submissiveness do not work now. pap knows it fr their falling votes.

but the consequences of those failed policies have never been admitted or apologised.

i m contemplating the failure of our cpf system. it was good initially when economy was good. but now, it doesn't seem so from the way new rules and conditions were conned out to qualify their delay of refunding the savings.
 
Back
Top