• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Good news if you love the fixed deposit

Brubeck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Yellen's said in her first FOMC press conference:

“So the language that we used in the statement is considerable period. So I, you know, this is the kind of term it’s hard to define. But, you know, probably means something on the order of around six months, that type of thing.”

The Fed said explicitly for the first time that it likely would keep short-term rates lower than normal, even after inflation and employment return to their longer-run trends. Its latest projections, also released Wednesday, showed officials coalescing around a 2015 lift off for interest rates.

Ten of 16 Fed officials said they saw the Fed's benchmark interest rate rising to 1% or more by the end of 2015, a slight uptick in projections from December, when only seven officials saw rates at or above the 1% level. Twelve of 16 officials expected the rate to be at or above 2% by the end of 2016. In December, eight officials saw rates at or above 2% by the end of 2016.
 

nutbush

Alfrescian
Loyal
yeah...

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2014/03/19/janet-yellens-first-fomc-statement-annotated/

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in January indicates that growth in economic activity slowed during the winter months, in part reflecting adverse weather conditions. Labor market indicators were mixed but on balance showed further improvement. The unemployment rate, however, remains elevated. Household spending and business fixed investment continued to advance, while the recovery in the housing sector remained slow. Fiscal policy is restraining economic growth, although the extent of restraint is diminishing. Inflation has been running below the Committee's longer-run objective, but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market conditions will continue to improve gradually, moving toward those the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee sees the risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as nearly balanced. The Committee recognizes that inflation persistently below its 2 percent objective could pose risks to economic performance, and it is monitoring inflation developments carefully for evidence that inflation will move back toward its objective over the medium term.

The Committee currently judges that there is sufficient underlying strength in the broader economy to support ongoing improvement in labor market conditions. In light of the cumulative progress toward maximum employment and the improvement in the outlook for labor market conditions since the inception of the current asset purchase program, the Committee decided to make a further measured reduction in the pace of its asset purchases. Beginning in April, the Committee will add to its holdings of agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $25 billion per month rather than $30 billion per month, and will add to its holdings of longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $30 billion per month rather than $35 billion per month. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee's sizable and still-increasing holdings of longer-term securities should maintain downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative, which in turn should promote a stronger economic recovery and help to ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with the Committee's dual mandate.

The Committee will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments in coming months and will continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate, until the outlook for the labor market has improved substantially in a context of price stability. If incoming information broadly supports the Committee's expectation of ongoing improvement in labor market conditions and inflation moving back toward its longer-run objective, the Committee will likely reduce the pace of asset purchases in further measured steps at future meetings. However, asset purchases are not on a preset course, and the Committee's decisions about their pace will remain contingent on the Committee's outlook for the labor market and inflation as well as its assessment of the likely efficacy and costs of such purchases.

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy remains appropriate. In determining how long to maintain the current 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess progress--both realized and expected--toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. The Committee continues to anticipate, based on its assessment of these factors, that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the current target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and provided that longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored.

When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent. The Committee currently anticipates that, even after employment and inflation are near mandate-consistent levels, economic conditions may, for some time, warrant keeping the target federal funds rate below levels the Committee views as normal in the longer run.

With the unemployment rate nearing 6-1/2 percent, the Committee has updated its forward guidance. The change in the Committee's guidance does not indicate any change in the Committee's policy intentions as set forth in its recent statements.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L. Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Richard W. Fisher; Sandra Pianalto; Charles I. Plosser; Jerome H. Powell; Jeremy C. Stein; and Daniel K. Tarullo.

Voting against the action was Narayana Kocherlakota, who supported the sixth paragraph, but believed the fifth paragraph weakens the credibility of the Committee's commitment to return inflation to the 2 percent target from below and fosters policy uncertainty that hinders economic activity.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
how about our CPF interest rates


CPF interest rates are not determined by the US. It is controlled by Ho Ching & company. If people want to get their hand on their own CPF simply vote out the PAP. However there might not be much left in the kitty:confused:
 

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Don't be fooled by such empty talks. When come 2015, they will give another excuse to why interest rate cannot go up and have to extend the low interest rate further. They have been doing this "kicking the ball down the road" since last year when Ben said they will "taper" on QE but in the end, say it need to delay. This is the delay tactic they are employing.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Tak9ODlBJgM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Last edited:

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
If you wanna get rich from bank interest, its a joke.

Unless you have several millions, the interest is good enough for a meal perhaps. It is definitely better to take a risk by investing in stocks.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If you wanna get rich from bank interest, its a joke.

Unless you have several millions, the interest is good enough for a meal perhaps. It is definitely better to take a risk by investing in stocks.

Sometimes people don't want to take risks or 'huat' overnight. Neither do they want to do research on which stocks to buy or constantly monitor stock prices.

Sometimes people just want to park their money in a safe location, keep it relatively liquid and unspoiled by the inflation rate.

Don't assume everyone's financial plans must conform to your ideas.
 

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
If you wanna get rich from bank interest, its a joke.

Unless you have several millions, the interest is good enough for a meal perhaps. It is definitely better to take a risk by investing in stocks.

I only want to ea rn enuf to keep the value of my hard earned funds - down with the crooks who got rich jerking around with out money!
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let's picture this:

1) Fixed deposit interest after 365 days is I dunno..... less than 1%?

2) Investment (depends on heng / suay. U can get 1-2% in one week). Of cos no such thing as free lunch. Play around with money u can afford to lose!
 

zeebjii

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let's picture this:

1) Fixed deposit interest after 365 days is I dunno..... less than 1%?

2) Investment (depends on heng / suay. U can get 1-2% in one week). Of cos no such thing as free lunch. Play around with money u can afford to lose!

How old are you? 20? 15? Interest on fixed deposit was 5-6% in the not-so-long-ago 1990s.
 

rushifa666

Alfrescian
Loyal
Let's do simple math. When coffee shop increase their price of drinks by 10 cent, factor in your shitty interest and you still are at a loss of 7 percent. The financially illiterate can't even beat inflation! And they want to make money?
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How old are you? 20? 15? Interest on fixed deposit was 5-6% in the not-so-long-ago 1990s.

Interest on fixed deposits is still high in other countries' banks, for example Indonesian banks.

http://indonesia.deposits.org/

Of course, you may have to convert SGD to rupiah but I'm sure it's still worth it.

Interest rates are deliberately kept low in Sinkieland so that people are more inclined to borrow: for shopping, for construction projects, for housing loans. Flood the money supply in the economy.

Perfect for Project 6.9 Million Population.

Nothing ever happens by accident. :wink:
 
Top