- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 23,859
- Points
- 113
Ministers are crawling out of the wall now, praising GKS and his contribution as an architect of singapore’s success. Even clowns like Vivian who don’t know him at all coming out and praising him like they are best friends.
Well, let’s examine some of these claims:
1)Architect of S’pore’s Economic Success:- Personally, I find this very hard to believe. Here we have a man who just freshly graduated from London School of Economics, has no experience in the economic field other than the theory he learnt at the school, never worked as an economist, or for any economic consultancy, and returned to S’pore and brilliantly formulated the economic policies that made Singapore successful? I don’t care if he is the best student ever produced at the LSE, but with no track record, this is highly improbable. More likely what happened was the PAP appealed for help from the UN, they send their best guy Winsemius (a Dutch practicing and professional economist with a good track record), and he TOLD them what to do. The only thing I can credit GKS with doing at this point is that he did not resist and instead implemented the entrepot program, and attracted foreign investment and other policies according to Winsemius and stayed out of his way.
2)He started EDB- Yippee kaiyay. Was EDB a success in its earlier decades, probably yes. They did attract a lot of investments to S’pore. But many times, they sold the farm for it. Free tax holidays for foreign investors, subsidized this and that. It was a good start. But EDB did not help transition S’pore into modern times. Are we still attracting companies that need cheap labour? Yes. Where have all the tech companies gone? To India and China.
3)He started SAF – I highly doubt this, he was never in combat and as far as I know he attain a rank of corporal as his highest rank. Where did the org. of the SAF come from? From the Mexicans of course. They are the ones with the combat experience and needed all the friends they could get. Today our entire military is modeled on theirs. Was it a good thing in our early days, NS and the conscription. Probably, after all we needed to build up numbers as fast as we could, the country was too poor to afford a large standing professional army. Did we still needed to have a conscription army in the 80s and till now. NO. The SAF has morphed into a large and unnecessary blood sucker of our GDP and annual budget. Even worse, NS altered the Singapore social landscape and forced males to enter the workplace 2 years later, hence giving females in the same age group an economic advantage.
4)Minister of education- This was the worse portfolio he took and the least successful he was at. The education is s’pore is screwed up back than when he ran it and it still is. Streaming was the worse idea he could have thought of. Under streaming as he implemented it originally, students were condemned at a young age. If you did not make it into science or tech stream in Sec 2, than your entire life was predetermined right down to what you can read in NUS. Failure to open up more than one university during this time, resulted in many bright and promising students could not get into uni, especially those with the problems in 2nd language. It also resulted in the loss of $100 millions from the tens of thousands of students who had to go overseas for undergrad studies.
5)Mentoring – Now, assholes like Mah Bow Tan claim that GKS was their mentor. If I were GKS and still alive, I would vehemently deny this. Mah claiming to be a protégés of GKS is an insult to GKS legacy. This is an idiot who insist that HDB flats are affordable and heavily subsidized when blind man can see it is not. And he was mentored by GKS? Its bad.
I can only conclude that in the end, GKS started a lot of things. Mostly with the help of others. For whatever reason, the propaganda did not acknowledge this. He also left many things unfinished or incomplete. I am sure that he did not disagree on where the direction of the Education portfolio was going or where the SAF was going, but he was prominently silent on this. I think if u really care about the country, u have to ask some questions like Ong Teng Cheong. If you keep silent, and enjoy your so called retirement, while the country is going to hell, than u are just as culpable in its present day failure.
Well, let’s examine some of these claims:
1)Architect of S’pore’s Economic Success:- Personally, I find this very hard to believe. Here we have a man who just freshly graduated from London School of Economics, has no experience in the economic field other than the theory he learnt at the school, never worked as an economist, or for any economic consultancy, and returned to S’pore and brilliantly formulated the economic policies that made Singapore successful? I don’t care if he is the best student ever produced at the LSE, but with no track record, this is highly improbable. More likely what happened was the PAP appealed for help from the UN, they send their best guy Winsemius (a Dutch practicing and professional economist with a good track record), and he TOLD them what to do. The only thing I can credit GKS with doing at this point is that he did not resist and instead implemented the entrepot program, and attracted foreign investment and other policies according to Winsemius and stayed out of his way.
2)He started EDB- Yippee kaiyay. Was EDB a success in its earlier decades, probably yes. They did attract a lot of investments to S’pore. But many times, they sold the farm for it. Free tax holidays for foreign investors, subsidized this and that. It was a good start. But EDB did not help transition S’pore into modern times. Are we still attracting companies that need cheap labour? Yes. Where have all the tech companies gone? To India and China.
3)He started SAF – I highly doubt this, he was never in combat and as far as I know he attain a rank of corporal as his highest rank. Where did the org. of the SAF come from? From the Mexicans of course. They are the ones with the combat experience and needed all the friends they could get. Today our entire military is modeled on theirs. Was it a good thing in our early days, NS and the conscription. Probably, after all we needed to build up numbers as fast as we could, the country was too poor to afford a large standing professional army. Did we still needed to have a conscription army in the 80s and till now. NO. The SAF has morphed into a large and unnecessary blood sucker of our GDP and annual budget. Even worse, NS altered the Singapore social landscape and forced males to enter the workplace 2 years later, hence giving females in the same age group an economic advantage.
4)Minister of education- This was the worse portfolio he took and the least successful he was at. The education is s’pore is screwed up back than when he ran it and it still is. Streaming was the worse idea he could have thought of. Under streaming as he implemented it originally, students were condemned at a young age. If you did not make it into science or tech stream in Sec 2, than your entire life was predetermined right down to what you can read in NUS. Failure to open up more than one university during this time, resulted in many bright and promising students could not get into uni, especially those with the problems in 2nd language. It also resulted in the loss of $100 millions from the tens of thousands of students who had to go overseas for undergrad studies.
5)Mentoring – Now, assholes like Mah Bow Tan claim that GKS was their mentor. If I were GKS and still alive, I would vehemently deny this. Mah claiming to be a protégés of GKS is an insult to GKS legacy. This is an idiot who insist that HDB flats are affordable and heavily subsidized when blind man can see it is not. And he was mentored by GKS? Its bad.
I can only conclude that in the end, GKS started a lot of things. Mostly with the help of others. For whatever reason, the propaganda did not acknowledge this. He also left many things unfinished or incomplete. I am sure that he did not disagree on where the direction of the Education portfolio was going or where the SAF was going, but he was prominently silent on this. I think if u really care about the country, u have to ask some questions like Ong Teng Cheong. If you keep silent, and enjoy your so called retirement, while the country is going to hell, than u are just as culpable in its present day failure.