not sure.
today msm totally quiet.
good read here :
Goh Jin Hian’s trial for market-rigging begins, following co-accused convictions
The criminal trial of Goh Jin Hian and Kelvyn Oo began on 4 February, 2026, following charges of false trading in New Silkroutes shares to support corporate acquisitions. Co-accused William Teo and Huang Yiwen have been sentenced.
The Online Citizen4 Feb 2026
AI-Generated Summary
- Trial begins for ex-New Silkroutes CEO Goh Jin Hian and former CCO Kelvyn Oo on 4 February, 2026.
- Goh and three others were charged with false trading to inflate share prices for corporate deals.
- Co-accused William Teo and Huang Yiwen have already received prison sentences.
The criminal trial of former New Silkroutes Group chief executive Goh Jin Hian and former chief corporate officer Kelvyn Oo Cheong Kwan commenced on the afternoon of 4 February, 2026, at the State Courts in Singapore.
Both men are facing multiple charges under the Securities and Futures Act for alleged market manipulation aimed at artificially inflating New Silkroutes’ share price to facilitate corporate transactions.
The charges arise from a joint investigation by the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) and the Monetary Authority of Singapore, with alleged offences committed between 26 February and 27 August, 2018.
According to the prosecution, the accused, along with two other individuals, carried out a “sophisticated, well-coordinated and effective” scheme to manipulate the company’s share price.The intention was to enable New Silkroutes to use its shares as currency for acquisitions and to raise capital through the issuance of new equity.
The alleged market-rigging involved share buybacks conducted through the company’s corporate trading account.
New Silkroutes had engaged GTC Group, headed by co-accused Huang Yiwen, as a commercial market maker to maintain liquidity in its shares.
On 15 August, 2025, Huang was sentenced to two years, three months and two weeks in prison after pleading guilty to 24 charges, with an additional 88 taken into consideration.
Another accomplice, former finance director William Teo Thiam Chuan, received a 12-week prison sentence on 16 September, 2024, for manipulating the firm’s share prices.
Teo pleaded guilty, with 25 further charges taken into consideration. He was found to have played a “critical” role in the scheme, allegedly masterminded by Goh.
Goh, 56, was chief executive of New Silkroutes between 2015 and 2020. He is the son of former prime minister Goh Chok Tong.
Following his tenure as CEO, he served briefly as non-independent and non-executive chairman until stepping down in October 2020.
According to the police, each of the four accused was charged with 31 counts of conspiring to create a misleading appearance in the trading of New Silkroutes shares.
Goh also faces eight additional charges for placing orders through his personal DBS Private Bank account to artificially raise share prices on eight trading days between 31 August and 4 December, 2018.
Shares of New Silkroutes have been suspended from trading since 15 November, 2021.
Goh was granted bail of S$150,000, while Oo was granted bail of S$70,000.
If convicted under Section 197 of the Securities and Futures Act, they each face up to seven years in prison, a fine of up to S$250,000, or both.
Goh and Teo resigned from their positions in October 2020, shortly after the company disclosed that both were assisting CAD in its investigations.
Oo had resigned earlier, in August 2020.
New Silkroutes, once focused on oil trading and electronics distribution, pivoted to healthcare in 2016. In 2017, it acquired clinics and medical supply companies but was hindered by a weakening share price that year.
According to prosecutors, the share price manipulation was seen as a "quick and convenient way" to drive expansion and capital raising.
Separately, in June 2025, the Appellate Division of the High Court ruled in favour of Goh in a civil suit involving Inter-Pacific Petroleum (IPP), where he had served as director.
The liquidators of the insolvent marine fuel firm had accused Goh of negligence over US$146 million (S$185.6 million) in losses stemming from alleged sham transactions in 2019.
While the court agreed that Goh had breached his duty of care due to ignorance of IPP’s business operations, it found the company had not proven his breach caused the financial loss.
Goh had described the civil suit as an attempt to “scapegoat” him.