• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Global US-Dollar Shortage - Are We Already in a Recession?

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal

Powell Signals Rate-Cut Delay After Run of Inflation Surprises​

  • Fed chair said appropriate to give policy further time to work
  • Central bank can keep rates steady for ‘as long as needed’





0:12
Powell Says Fed Policy Will Likely Need More Time to Work
Unmute




Powell Says Fed Policy Will Likely Need More Time to Work
By Craig Torres
April 17, 2024 at 1:38 AM GMT+8
Updated on
April 17, 2024 at 2:58 AM GMT+8

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell signaled policymakers will wait longer than previously anticipated to cut interest rates following a series of surprisingly high inflation readings.

Powell pointed to the lack of additional progress made on inflation after the rapid decline seen at the end of last year, noting it will likely take more time for officials to gain the necessary confidence that price growth is headed toward the Fed’s 2% goal before lower borrowing costs.
https://www.bloomberg.com/tips/
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal

What If Fed Rate Hikes Are Actually Sparking US Economic Boom?​

  • A radical theory is spreading as economy defies expectations
  • ‘The reality is people have more money,’ one convert says


The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building stands in Washington, DC.

The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building stands in Washington, DC.
Photographer: Erin Scott/Bloomberg
By Ye Xie
April 16, 2024 at 8:00 PM GMT+8

As the US economy hums along month after month, minting hundreds of thousands of new jobs and confounding experts who had warned of an imminent downturn, some on Wall Street are starting to entertain a fringe economic theory.

What if, they ask, all those interest-rate hikes the past two years are actually boosting the economy? In other words, maybe the economy isn’t booming despite higher rates but rather  because of them.
https://www.bloomberg.com/tips/
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
Subscribe
High Interest Rate Era:
Higher Rates Changed the WorldHow Pros Misread the EconomyPrice of Money Is Going UpShattered Housing Dreams
Markets
Markets Magazine

Whatever the Fed Does Next, Higher Interest Rates Have Changed the World​

Economists and top investors weigh in on what tighter money has meant for consumers, governments, workers and traders


Surveillance HP

By Carter Johnson
December 13, 2023 at 10:00 PM GMT+8

Benchmark US Treasury yields have shot from less than 1% in 2020 to more than 4%, reflecting the raised costs of financing for everyone from mortgage borrowers to business startups. We asked leading economists and investors to reflect on the consequences of tighter money. Their responses have been edited for clarity and length.

How are higher interest rates changing the world?
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articl...ries-feel-same-pinch-of-higher-interest-rates


Housing is One Reason Not All Countries Feel Same Pinch of Higher Interest Rates

Effects may be delayed in some countries: if interest rates remain higher for longer, homeowners will likely feel their effects as mortgage rates adjust
Mehdi Benatiya Andaloussi, Nina Biljanovska, Alessia De Stefani, Rui C. Mano
April 8, 2024


Central banks have raised interest rates significantly over the past two years to combat post-pandemic inflation. Many thought this would lead to a slowdown in economic activity. Yet, global growth has held broadly steady, with deceleration only materializing in some countries.

Why are some feeling the pinch from higher rates and not others? The answer partly lies in differences in mortgage and housing market characteristics.

The effects of rising monetary policy rates on activity partly depend on housing and mortgage market characteristics, which vary significantly across countries, as we show in a chapter of our latest World Economic Outlook.
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
weo-housing-blog-chart1-v2.ashx


Housing is an important channel of monetary policy transmission. Mortgages are the largest liability for households, with housing often serving as their only significant form of wealth. Real estate also accounts for a large share of consumption, investment, employment, and consumer prices in most economies.

To assess how key housing characteristics impact the effects of monetary policy on activity, our research leverages new data on housing and mortgage markets compiled across countries: we find that those characteristics vary significantly across countries. For example, the share of fixed-rate mortgages in all country-level mortgages can vary from close to zero in South Africa to more than 95 percent in Mexico or the United States.
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
weo-housing-blog-chart2-v2.ashx


Our results indicate that monetary policy has greater effects on activity in countries where the share of fixed-rate mortgages is low. This is due to homeowners seeing their monthly payments rise with monetary policy rates if their mortgage rates adjust. By contrast, households with fixed-rate mortgages will not see any immediate difference in their monthly payments when policy rates change.

The effects of monetary policy are also stronger in countries where mortgages are larger compared to home values, and in countries where household debt is high as a share of GDP. In such settings, more households will be exposed to changes in mortgage rates, and the effects will be stronger if their debt is higher relative to their assets.

Housing market characteristics also matter: the transmission of monetary policy is stronger where housing supply is more restricted. For example, lower rates will decrease borrowing costs for first-time home buyers and increase demand. Where supply is restricted, this will lead to home price appreciation. Existing owners will see their wealth increase as a result, leading them to consume more, including if they can use their home as collateral to borrow more.

The same holds true where home prices have recently been overvalued. Sharp price increases are often driven by overly optimistic views about future house prices. These are typically accompanied by excessive leverage, prompting spirals of falling home prices and foreclosures when monetary policy tightens, which can lead to starker income and consumption declines.
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
Weaker housing transmission

Mortgage and real estate markets have undergone several shifts since the global financial crisis and the pandemic. At the beginning of the recent hiking cycle and after a long period of low interest rates, mortgage interest payments were historically low, the average maturity was long, and the average share of fixed-rate mortgages was high in many countries. In addition, the pandemic led to population shifts away from city centers and to relatively less-supply-constrained areas.

As a result, the housing channels of monetary policy may have weakened, or at least been delayed, in several countries.

Country experiences vary widely. Changes in mortgage market characteristics in countries such as Canada and Japan suggest a strengthening of the transmission of monetary policy through housing. This is driven mainly by a declining share of fixed-rate mortgages, an increase in debt, and more constrained housing supply. By contrast, transmission seems to have weakened in countries such as Hungary, Ireland, Portugal, and the United States, where characteristics have moved in the opposite direction.

weo-housing-blog-charts-v3.ashx
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/gold-burns-a-hole-in-the-pocket


High price of gold in Malaysia puts off jewellery buyers​

2024-03-18T160735Z239506687RC2XAV946QLKRTRMADP3GLOBAL-PRECIOUS.JPG

The spiralling price of gold in recent weeks has made many Malaysians turn away from buying jewellery. PHOTO: REUTERS
UPDATED

APR 16, 2024, 11:15 AM

FacebookTelegram

KUALA LUMPUR – Manager M. Devi wanted to buy a gold bracelet for her friend, who was getting married. She walked into a jeweller’s shop but her jaw dropped when she saw a rubber band-thin bracelet priced at RM2,800 (S$800).

The 57-year-old decided it will be better to just give her friend a cash packet.
The spiralling price of gold in recent weeks has made many people turn away from buying jewellery. It is worse now because this is an auspicious time for weddings for both Indians and Chinese.

Culturally, Malaysians – especially Malays and Indians – buy gold for their weddings, birthdays and newborns.

For South Indians, the month of Chithirai, which began on April 15, is the season of weddings.

The Chinese, too, prefer to hold weddings after Qing Ming Festival, which was on April 4.


Meaning Atas Jiuhu need to rush over to steal breakfast and stay later to steal eat supper from Saw Hei Sinki??
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
When the COVID-19 pandemic hit the United States in early March 2020, the Fed quickly stepped in to limit the economic fallout. It reduced its interest rate target to near zero and purchased large quantities of U.S. Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) by injecting reserves into the banking system. As a result of these purchases, the size of the Fed's balance sheet more than doubled from about $4 trillion prior to the pandemic to nearly $9 trillion at the start of 2022.

The Fed first engaged in this type of balance sheet expansion, popularly known as quantitative easing (QE), more than a decade ago. It was one of the then-unconventional monetary policy tools the Fed employed in reaction to the Great Recession. With its return during the pandemic, QE seems to have become a more routine part of the Fed's crisis toolkit. But there is still debate among economists over how and how well it works. And when it comes to the reverse process of shrinking the Fed's balance sheet, typically referred to as quantitative tightening (QT), economists know even less.

In response to inflation running well above its long-run target, the Fed began unwinding its accommodative monetary policy this year. This entailed ending QE in March and then beginning QT in June. When QE ended, the Fed reinvested any maturing securities to maintain the size of its balance sheet. With QT, the Fed stopped reinvesting up to $30 billion in maturing Treasuries and $17.5 billion in maturing MBS every month, passively shrinking its assets as those securities "roll off" without being replaced. Those caps are scheduled to rise to $60 billion and $35 billion, respectively, in September.

This process is similar to the one the Fed used when it last engaged in QT from 2017 to 2019, albeit at a faster pace. That brief prior period is the only other experience the central bank has had with shrinking its balance sheet, leaving little empirical evidence to draw on when it comes to calculating its effects. At a press conference on May 4 following the Fed's announcement that it would begin QT in June, Fed Chair Jerome Powell offered, "I would just stress how uncertain the effect is of shrinking the balance sheet."

Given this uncertainty, what does the Fed hope to accomplish with QT, what does it want to avoid, and what do economists really know about using the central bank's balance sheet as a policy tool?
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
imparting some restraint on the economy."

While the signaling effects of QT may be weaker, Smith and Valcarcel found that the liquidity effects were roughly double those experienced under QE. As the Fed allows maturing securities to fall off the asset side of its balance sheet, it shrinks reserves on the liability side by an equivalent amount. At the same time, because the Fed is no longer purchasing Treasuries and agency MBS, private markets need to absorb more of those assets. This can result in some volatility as investors adjust.

This tightening through the liquidity channel may not show up immediately. In a 2017 policy paper, Falk Bräuning of the Boston Fed estimated that the magnitude of the liquidity effect from QT depends on the total quantity of reserves in circulation. When the Fed first begins to shrink its balance sheet, reserves will still be well above what banks require. But as the total supply of reserves shrinks, each additional dollar of reserves drained will have a greater effect on interest rates.
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal

Reloading for the NEXT Crisis​

A final reason for engaging in QT is to free up capacity for a future QE. If the Fed's balance sheet were to continue to grow, it could, in theory, run out of Treasuries or other acceptable assets to purchase to conduct QE in the future.

Former Richmond Fed President J. Alfred Broaddus Jr. and policy advisor Marvin Goodfriend confronted this issue under very different circumstances in a 2001 Richmond Fed Economic Quarterly article. At that time, the federal government was enjoying a budget surplus, and Broaddus and Goodfriend were concerned that the Treasuries market could dry up if the United States were to pay down its debt. While that didn't come to pass (and indeed seems difficult to imagine today), the Fed could still face the same problem if its asset purchases were to outpace the supply of Treasuries. Additionally, an ever-increasing balance sheet would expose the Fed to even larger losses in a tightening cycle.

"The Fed would rather not have this ratchet effect where the balance sheet just keeps getting bigger, because at some point, you have a problem," says English. "I think they want to be clear that this is a counter-cyclical policy that they'll engage in to provide support when it's necessary, and they'll unwind when it's appropriate to do so."
 
Top