• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

'Give pay rise to beat inflation': NTUC

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,177
Points
48
Why they never talk about productivity when it is NTUC that propose pay-rise?


The National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) has proposed to the National Wages Council (NWC) that workers be given a minimum dollar amount as an increment to their basic pay - instead of getting it as a one-off payment.

The fixed dollar amount should be enough to offset the impact of inflation for low-wage workers, sources said.

This move to boost the pay of low-wage workers comes amid the drive by the Government and NTUC to raise the pay of these workers, especially those in the cleaning and security sectors.

Currently, the NWC issues broad guidelines that increments have two parts: a fixed amount plus a percentage increase. It does not specify what that fixed amount should be.

Unionists interviewed declined to disclose the fixed amount but one described it as 'meaningful' for low-wage workers. The amount is believed to be higher than inflation for a worker earning less than $1,000 monthly.

If accepted, the proposal will see the real wages of these workers go up.

Inflation rose 5.2 per cent in March but the prices of necessities and essential services rose at a more moderate pace of 3 per cent or lower, according to Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, who made the point at a May Day dinner on Sunday.

The NTUC proposal stems from its preference for low-wage workers to get a pay rise based on a fixed dollar amount instead of having it calculated as a percentage of their pay.

It was tabled at NWC meetings last month. A source familiar with the annual wage talks said there was no immediate objection to the idea from the employer representatives on the council.

The 18-member NWC is made up of a chairman, six NTUC unionists, six representatives from employer groups, and five public-sector officials.

Some MPs and bosses interviewed liked the proposal.

Mr Zainudin Nordin, MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, said he 'definitely welcomed' the idea of an 'inflation plus' model. 'It will help low-wage workers, because their main worry now is the cost of living,' said the chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Manpower.

Mr T. Mogan, security director of security and investigation firm Dragnet, is not fazed by the higher wage bill.

He argued that the bigger pay packet will attract better workers and this will, in turn, improve the image of the industry.

However, he urged the NWC to educate employers not to suppress wages by going for the cheapest bid when buying security and cleaning services.

UniSIM's Associate Professor Randolph Tan, however, feared that fixed pay rises could reduce flexibility in the labour market and may be counterproductive.

He said: 'The higher wage increases benefit only those who are employed, as it may not prevent employers from laying off those who are relatively too costly.'

Prof Tan preferred that employers 'systematically ensure that their low-wage workers move up the skills and productivity ladder'.

The NWC is expected to discuss the NTUC proposal when it meets again in two weeks' time. And its recommendations could be released as early as the end of this month.

[email protected]
 
wtf, are they contradicting the government or not?
Mudland is already having plans to implement min. wage...why isn't Singapore looking to do the same?

when they raise ministers' wages, do they talk about productivity of the ministers? Why do we have 80+ MPs? if they are seriously talking about productivity, how about halving the number of MPs for a start?
 
Last edited:
wtf, are they contradicting the government or not?
Mudland is already having plans to implement min. wage...why isn't Singapore looking to do the same?

when they raise ministers' wages, do they talk about productivity of the ministers? Why do we have 80+ MPs? if they are seriously talking about productivity, how about halving the number of MPs for a start?

80+ MP for a small city state
Malaysian only have 220 MP for whole country 500 times bigger than Singapore.Population 6 times compare Singapore.
Productivity Singapore Ministers is the worst in the world if compare productivity over salary.
 
Back
Top