- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 15,519
- Points
- 113
The Afghan man was supposed to have been deported, but left-wing open borders policies ensured he remained in Germany, where he allegedly went on to murder his manager in a bloody "frenzy"
An Afghan man allegedly plunged his knife 26 times into his manager, who ran a “New Yorker” clothing store in the downtown area of Krefeld in Germany. Another shocking femicide, but one that could have been prevented, as the man was supposed to have already been deported.
Dating back to May 7 of this year, Sayed Akbar S. is now on trial in the Krefeld Regional Court for murdering Magda M.
Sayed Akbar S. already had his asylum application rejected. However, German authorities allowed the man to stay due to a deportation ban, as Afghanistan was allegedly “too dangerous” for Sayed Akbar S. to be sent back to.
The 25-year-old Afghan man is accused of surprising his boss on the third floor of the clothing store, where he stabbed her 26 times in the chest and stomach. Sayed Akbar S. used an 8-centimeter-long knife during the attack and is described as stabbing the woman in “frenzy.” After the act, he was completely covered in the victim’s blood.
The woman was described as “popular” and had many friends, colleagues, and family who gathered at the man’s trial on Nov. 3. Magda’s mother and her partner faced the accused killer in court as well.
he Afghan suspect “remained silent” during the first day of trial, according to German newspaper Rheinische Post. The man’s lawyer “declined to comment on the charges on the first day of the trial.”
As a result, the first day of trial only involved the recording of the defendant’s details, and was then adjourned after just eight minutes. This “caused discontent” among those gathered to witness the trial, according to the Rheinische Post.
The frustration boiled over once the proceedings ended. “Some complained about the lack of results on the first day of the trial.” Another person “directed wild insults at the defendant after the opening proceedings,” leading to the man being asked to leave the courtroom.
The public prosecutor’s office assumes that the man was not criminally responsible at the time of the incident “due to paranoid schizophrenia.” Following an examination, the man was transferred from pretrial detention to a psychiatric hospital. The jury court must now decide whether the man must remain there permanently.
The next hearing is scheduled for Nov. 20.
