• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Gerald & Friends cannot even get the median income data correct!

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Did the committee actually deliberately attempt to mislead the public? At the time that I wrote my Press release I thought not – but now I’m not so sure. Maybe when feedback came back to them that linking Ministerial pay with the top 0.02% of earners in the country would send the wrong message they sought to downplay it. The figure 1,400th sounds so much better than 501st or even 700th. The only other explanation for the fundamental mistake is that they don’t understand the Math. We need to be seriously concerned about this. If a civil servant heading an enquiry produced this type of error anywhere else then heads would roll. In may opinion it goes to the heart of credibility of the whole report.

http://sonofadud.com/2012/01/05/a-c...ading-the-public-or-incompetent/#comment-1213
 
Back
Top