GE2024/2025 - Not Voting anymore if...

[face the facts]

how many times must I tell u guys. voting in peesai is waste of time. better to just leave if cant tolerate..its either rigged or futile. cheebye loong had seen to that.

 

[A Singaporean]

The entire PAP organisation would like to thank you for your contributions to the continued success for the PAP in the coming election. Majulah and look out for our next disbursement of cdc vouchers. Thank you for making PAP great again. To arse fucked you is our pleasure.

 

[tobelightlight]

how many times must I tell u guys. voting in peesai is waste of time. better to just leave if cant tolerate..its either rigged or futile. cheebye loong had seen to that.

Yeah, agree to that. Keep your world-class sg passport that allow you to travel anywhere and live outside of sg. The world is great.

 

[myfoot123]

If AMK falls into the hand of opposition. Pinky Looney will be kicked out of parlaiment for good.

 

[k1976]

If AMK falls into the hand of opposition. Pinky Looney will be kicked out of parlaiment for good.

Cannot be de woh

 

[Robert Half]

Potong Pasir used to be an opposition ward in the before GE 2011 now it’s interesting to the single seat ward remained in electoral map

 

[oliverlee]

Rome was not built in a day. We're an infant democracy. Take achievable walking steps before learning to run.

1. Get enough oppo MPs in to form 1/3 of parliament, to prevent PAP from getting a 2/3 supermajority vote to change the constitution at will to cement its hegemony
2. Then aim for the 51% mark to form a coalition oppo govt
3. Finally, a big enough oppo party or alliance to contest head to head with the PAP every election.

We are not a democracy. The rule of democratic law always limits terms of office to 8 years. You can always depart from the norm, but having limits is a means of equity that ensures the best person at any point in time will lead the nation forward

 

[superpower]

We are not a democracy. The rule of democratic law always limits terms of office to 8 years. You can always depart from the norm, but having limits is a means of equity that ensures the best person at any point in time will lead the nation forward

The UK does not have term limits for party or PM. It is still a highly functioning democracy.

 

[nabeifuckpap]

To the coolie gene sinkie who started this thread you just have no balls same as all PAP voters

 

[Robert Half]

One party dominated system is not always good for the people. We do not want to move towards a direction where the good jobs are for the migrant sob & that leave the local people helpless.

I hope all opposition supporters can be united again because our future depended on your votes

 

[oliverlee]

The UK does not have term limits for party or PM. It is still a highly functioning democracy.

48. This provision reflects the maximum term currently permissible under the Septennial Act 1715, as amended by the Parliament Act 1911. In introducing the 1911 Act, the Prime Minister, Herbert Asquith, told the House of Commons:

• "We propose to shorten the legal duration of Parliament from seven years to five years, which will probably amount in practice to an actual legislative working term of four years. That will secure that your House of Commons for the time being, is always either fresh from the polls which gave it authority, or—and this is an equally effective check upon acting in defiance of the popular will—it is looking forward to the polls at which it will have to render an account of its stewardship."

49. Asquith's expectation of four year parliamentary terms has been broadly borne out. There have been 18 post-war general elections, and the average length of time between general elections since 1945 is three years and ten months.

Excerpt from CHAPTER 3: The length of the parliamentary term and election timing, Fixed-term Parliaments Bill - Constitution Committee

 

[Charlie99]

Rome was not built in a day. We're an infant democracy. Take achievable walking steps before learning to run.

1. Get enough oppo MPs in to form 1/3 of parliament, to prevent PAP from getting a 2/3 supermajority vote to change the constitution at will to cement its hegemony
2. Then aim for the 51% mark to form a coalition oppo govt
3. Finally, a big enough oppo party or alliance to contest head to head with the PAP every election.

I have been writing about the importance of denying the PAP of a two thirds majority, in order to prevent the PAP from amending the Constitution to suit its agenda.

 

[laksaboy]

I have been writing about the importance of denying the PAP of a two thirds majority, in order to prevent the PAP from amending the Constitution to suit its agenda.

The Sinkie Constitution before any amendments was already not worth the toilet paper it's printed on. It is nothing more than a blank cheque for tyrants.