• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Funny and dirty lawyer Edmund Wong arrested while jalan-jalan in Geylang lot 14/16

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Singapore
Lawyer suspended in 2018 for focusing on victim's breast size fined by court for obstructing police
1620214270846.png

Edmund Wong Sin Yee. (Photo: Facebook/Edmund Wong)

By Lydia Lam
05 May 2021 02:38PM(Updated: 05 May 2021 02:40PM

SINGAPORE: A lawyer who was suspended in 2018 for "disgraceful" conduct over a "demeaning" line of questioning towards a molestation victim was fined S$2,000 by a court on Wednesday (May 5) for obstructing the police.

Wong Sin Yee, otherwise known as Edmund Wong, pleaded guilty to one count of obstructing a public servant in the discharge of his functions. He was given a discharge amounting to an acquittal for a second charge of perverting the course of justice in filing a defence case and had been administered a stern warning for this.

Wong, 62, was a practising advocate and solicitor and the director of law firm S Y Wong Law Chambers at the time of the offence in 2017.

The court heard that a deputy superintendent of the Singapore Police Force led a group of police officers in an operation at the back lane between Lorong 14 and Lorong 16 Geylang on the night of Jan 13, 2017.

Police detained about 10 people suspected of being secret society members and were conducting checks on them when Wong arrived at the location and loitered nearby.

The deputy superintendent approached Wong and asked if he was a police officer at about 10.10pm. Wong shouted at him in an angry tone, saying he was "bigger" than a police officer.

When the officer asked him what he meant, Wong shouted that he "is an officer from the Supreme Court" and therefore the police officer had to call him "sir". His shouting drew the attention of some suspects as well as the public.

When the police verified Wong's identity and asked him to leave as his behaviour was hindering their operation, Wong refused to and was arrested.

The court heard that Wong has previous convictions, including disobeying an order from a public servant in 1994 and using threatening, abusive or insulting words of behaviour in 2001.

The prosecutor said Wong's referring to his status as a lawyer "sullies the good name of the legal profession" and the fine must be sufficiently high to reflect this.

Wong's lawyer said his client apologises for the wrong he has done but said the police officer was shouting at him, prompting an "impulsive reaction" to shout back.

In 2018, Wong made headlines after the highest disciplinary body for lawyers suspended him for the maximum five years for professional misconduct.

He had stared at the breasts of a victim of molestation during cross-examination and repeatedly asked if she thought she was attractive.

After that, he commanded her to stand up and scrutinised her chest. His client was then accused of brushing his forearm against her breast on the train.

Wong later said he was trying to mount a case claiming that the victim was unattractive and his client would not have been motivated to outrage her modesty. Any contact that took place was accidental.

His client was found guilty and jailed for five months.

Source: CNA/ll(ta)
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Was he on drug or alcoholic..... lawyer is stressful job... need to de-stress with drug or alcohol...
 

Balls2U

Alfrescian
Loyal
This fucker had been detained for many years without trial on suspicion of involvement with an international drug syndicate.
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wow this guy has a colourful background


Alleged drug lord loses plea against detention
Selina Lum
Thu, Sep 20, 2007
The Straits Times​
blank.gif
A DISGRACED lawyer, detained without trial since September 2005 under a ministerial order, has failed in his court bid to be freed.
Edmund Wong Sin Yee, 49, has been held for the past two years under the Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act, which allows for detention without trial for those suspected of criminal activities.

To order such detention, the Home Affairs Minister has to be satisfied that it is necessary in the interests of public safety, peace and good order.

In Wong's case, he had been accused of being a drug kingpin in a syndicate that smuggled ketamine from Malaysia to Taiwan and from Malaysia to China through Hong Kong between early 2004 and April 2005.

Last month, Wong challenged his detention in the High Court - asserting that it was unlawful to detain him under the Act.

But in a written judgment released yesterday, Justice Tan Lee Meng said there are no grounds for ordering Wong's release as he has failed to prove his case.

The judge stressed, however, that his role was not to determine whether or not Wong was guilty of the activities he has been accused of.

Wong's lawyer, Senior Counsel Jimmy Yim, who took up the case pro bono, argued that the Act did not allow for the detention of a person for criminal activities done outside Singapore.

He argued that even if the accusations were true, Wong's alleged activities did not affect public safety, peace and good order in Singapore.

Justice Tan disagreed. He said the threat to public safety, peace and good order did not necessarily have to result from activities in Singapore.

Mr Yim also contended that the minister had based his decision on the reports of narcotics officers who were biased against Wong.

But the judge found no evidence that the officers had misled the minister or that he had issued the order without applying his mind to the matter.

Mr Yim also contended that the required procedures in Wong's detention were not properly followed. Justice Tan was again not persuaded.

In addition, Mr Yim argued that Wong should be tried by a court rather than detained under the Act. Justice Tan said that this was not up to the court to decide.
Wong's life has been marked with brushes with the law. In 2001, he was jailed for one year and fined $1,000 for a road rage incident. He also had previous convictions. In July 2003, he was suspended from practice for two years over the road-rage incident.

[email protected]
 

kaninabuchaojibye

Alfrescian
Loyal
is this the same chap many many years ago at changi airport security when taking a flight and was body searched told the security that he has a gun in his groin
haaaa
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
So the lawyer's logic is this.....

if an unattractive woman accused a man of molest, then she must be lying. WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT LOGIC? lol
 

ToaPehGong

Alfrescian
Loyal
In 2018, Wong made headlines after the highest disciplinary body for lawyers suspended him for the maximum five years for professional misconduct.

He had stared at the breasts of a victim of molestation during cross-examination and repeatedly asked if she thought she was attractive.

After that, he commanded her to stand up and scrutinised her chest. His client was then accused of brushing his forearm against her breast on the train.

Wong later said he was trying to mount a case claiming that the victim was unattractive and his client would not have been motivated to outrage her modesty. Any contact that took place was accidental.

His client was found guilty and jailed for five months.
Real life porn scene with 5 months jail suffered by the client instead
 

zeddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
KNN this guy is really one bad ass educated Pai Lang. He also has this kuailan face. LOL
 
Top