Chitchat Forum upgraded to SSL - a few bugs working on it now

[dr.wailing]

I'm sure he can read everyones PMs regardless if its ssl or not.

Yes, you're totally correct.

 

[krafty]

he read never mind but dun let those lasup matas read, can already...

 

[mojito]

Appreciate the effort Sam. Though the reply with quote function does not work for me for some reason, auto text markups not loading, generally everything else works as before.

 

[gsfosnis]

Thanks Boss Sam, hope all Sammyboys appreciate your effort and the additional cost incurred with SSL. Sammyboys should put in more effort and contribute more interesting articles and posts. Cheers!

 

[rocket]

Great effort..... showing responsibility to protect us.

 

[jinjiaho]

Awesome! Now I feel very safe to post here. No crazy ass will pop me when he beh song with my postings!

Well done and good job!!

 

[Leongsam]

Awesome! Now I feel very safe to post here. No crazy ass will pop me when he beh song with my postings!

Well done and good job!!

Disabled for the time being. More work needs to be done to make it work.

 

[krafty]

Postings may be public but what about your password, the stuff you exchange via PM which might contain personal details of your life which you would not want made public? There is nothing wrong with adding more privacy. It will definitely add value in the long run.

Yes, you're totally correct.

Disabled for the time being. More work needs to be done to make it work.

i still think you are wasting time unless maybe you have few servers tx and Rx data. i do not know your network map but i am sure for an ordinary forum, it does not need to have ssl. even private messages among forummers here are tx within the server. how to intercept?

 

[frenchbriefs]

i still think you are wasting time unless maybe you have few servers tx and Rx data. i do not know your network map but i am sure for an ordinary forum, it does not need to have ssl. even private messages among forummers here are tx within the server. how to intercept?

u have to transmit ur message to the server first before the server transfer it to the end user?

 

[krafty]

u have to transmit ur message to the server first before the server transfer it to the end user?

hmm...you got it right, paiseh! but my point is it's a carefree forum not like we are some spies exchanging info., why so secretive? unless CIA is monitoring huh...

 

[Leongsam]

i still think you are wasting time unless maybe you have few servers tx and Rx data. i do not know your network map but i am sure for an ordinary forum, it does not need to have ssl. even private messages among forummers here are tx within the server. how to intercept?

If you don't know what you are talking about it would be best if keep your trap shut.

 

[JohnTan]

Thank you Boss Sam! We can now be assured that CIA or Mossad cannot trace us and hunt us down if they are not happy with our posts.

 

[chootchiew]

Re: Forum upgraded to SSL

May I ask why there isn't a need for SSL?

May I ask why there is a need for this forum ?

 

[tanwahtiu]

good boy, take so long to think about it.

only cost $60 a year for https version.

All pages are now https.

 

[krafty]

i am never surprised tht you never admit tht you are so dumb..heehee...if I tell u guys wht i know, i will be in deep shit. so you can carry on with your wasting of time.

 

[eatshitndie]

i am never surprised tht you never admit tht you are so dumb..heehee...if I tell u guys wht i know, i will be in deep shit. so you can carry on with your wasting of time.

it's not dumb with end to end encryption, even a weak cipher. although not 100% hackproof, it poses a burden and challenge for majority of hackers, and only the very determined and skilled with morbid curiosity of what sbf members exchange in their pm's would not give up trying. this provides peace of mind for some members like a condom or placebo.

 

[Leongsam]

good boy, take so long to think about it.

only cost $60 a year for https version.

It's free.

 

[krafty]

it's not dumb with end to end encryption, even a weak cipher. although not 100% hackproof, it poses a burden and challenge for majority of hackers, and only the very determined and skilled with morbid curiosity of what sbf members exchange in their pm's would not give up trying. this provides peace of mind for some members like a condom or placebo.

this is mainly a forum for siao thing tongs, what so serious about it? i even set a very easy to guess password, i have no qualms abt pple using my account to post on my behalf. i can give it to you if you want.

 

[dr.wailing]

It's free.

I notice that the CA of your forum is Comodo, which had problems with bogus SSL certificates in the past. Read the articile "Comodo hacker claims another certificate authority" url: http://www.pcworld.com/article/223760/article.html

If the SSL service is free, why is the expiry date of the certificate 12/11/2016, which is only a few months from now?

 

[STUCK_HERE]

Who wants to tap your message? It can be seen as plain text when it reach it's destination. That's what a forum is for, so that everybody can see your message.