• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Former Mental Minister: You need foreign talents to clean tables

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
7,933
Points
48
He is really going senile and spastic while his son has been telling lies to us. He is adamant that we need young foreign talents who cannot speak English to replace old lady citizens for cleaning our tables.

Oh, btw, 20,000 will be digestible.

Crises can't be overcome with just good governance: Lee Kuan Yew
20110915.083120_lky430.jpg



<b:if cond="data:blog.pageType != &quot;static_page&quot;"></b:if>By Victoria Barker
my paper
Thursday, Sep 15, 2011

In times of trouble, good governance alone is not enough to solve problems, former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew said last night.
He was responding to a question on how his views on good governance have been shaped by recent developments in the United States and Europe.
Mr Lee said: "All it means is that you have a system in place... In critical times, it might just tip over."
He was speaking at a dialogue at the National University of Singapore's (NUS) University Cultural Centre Hall.
The dialogue, which was moderated by Professor Kishore Mahbubani, was attended by some 600 students, faculty members and guests.
The 50-minute session was part of the seventh-anniversary celebrations of NUS' Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKY School). Prof Mahbubani is the dean of the school.
Mr Lee said Singapore has no plans to buy bonds from European countries facing a debt crisis as "we are in no position to rescue them".
European leaders will try very hard to prevent the collapse of their currency union as that would be "an admission that their aspiration of one Europe is not achievable", he said.
"I do not see it being saved, but they'll try and keep it going."
Mr Lee fielded questions on diverse topics, from whether the Singapore model would work in a larger nation like India, to his vision for Singapore's future.
When asked about ways to deal with Singapore's ageing population, Mr Lee reiterated that welcoming new immigrants is the best solution.
The fertility rate here has fallen to 1.15, and he does not expect to see it going back to 2.1, the rate of replacement.
He added that Singaporeans currently "just do not want to see so many foreigners in their midst", but he feels certain they will come around.
"The turning point will be reached when they find they're hurt by objecting to immigrants coming to Singapore... Not for the moment, but (in) 20, 30 years," he said.
A major reason Singaporeans have difficulty accepting foreigners is the differences in language, he noted.
"They're discomforted when they see the young migrants working at the kopitiam, cleaning the tables, putting our old ladies out of work and unable to speak English," he said.
It would take a generation for immigrants to "become Singaporean", as the "accents and speech" of current immigrants have "already been set".
Candid and relaxed throughout the dialogue, Mr Lee drew laughter when he pointedly asked why the questions read out by Prof Mahbubani were all from non-Singaporeans.
"I would like to answer what Singaporeans would like to know, because they are my responsibility," he said to loud applause.
"I'm not an expert in the conditions of 50 different countries (from which students at the LKY School hail) and I'm not qualified to give them advice, but I do know something about Singapore," he added.
At the event, Mr Lee unveiled the French editions of his two-volume memoir, L'Histoire De Singapour (The Singapore Story) and Du Tiers-Monde A La Prosperite (From Third World To First).
 
Last edited:
With no one to tell him what's right and what's wromg, Singapore faces the difficulty of having to shut up this mafia mentor's smelly mouth.
 
The turning point will be reached when they find they're hurt by objecting to immigrants coming to Singapore... Not for the moment, but (in) 20, 30 years," he said.

Don't think we'll feel hurt for the moment or in 20, 30 years time...


I would like to answer what Singaporeans would like to know, because they are my responsibility" he said to loud applause

We don't need you to be responsible for us... Now F*ck off and just up the lorry ASAP..
 
Last edited:
hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. tsk, tsk, tsk.
3. just shut up the big hole and drop dead leh!
 
LKY likes flipping prata ar.. He keeps on going back and Forth.. He is trying very hard to justify the reasons for immigrants and he obviously failed to see which group of
Foreigners we have issues with + giving away citizenship/P.r like toilet paper. This guy is either very confused, Ignorant or just being a Hypocrite turning and twisting his words. This is the standard behavior of Dictators.
 
Last edited:
The trouble with him is that he thinks without him the country will collapse overnight. The trouble with us is that we too think the country will collapse overnight without him. The expat community feels exactly the same. This has been so ingrained so deep for so long, that we are paying a bitter price. The day he kicks the bucket, hopefully people will come to realise that this is not the case.
 
Candid and relaxed throughout the dialogue, Mr Lee drew laughter when he pointedly asked why the questions read out by Prof Mahbubani were all from non-Singaporeans.
"I would like to answer what Singaporeans would like to know, because they are my responsibility," he said to loud applause.

For all the things you may criticize about the old man, the past week has shown he's still as sharp with his response when it comes to pointy questions. No point charging directly at him with a shinai, it'll be deflected. Over time however, he'll surely make a misstep. It will take a swashbuckler to get a hit after several rounds of parries and thrusts. Legislators ought to learn from the maestro LTK to complement their own strengths.
 
He is really going senile and spastic while his son has been telling lies to us. He is adamant that we need young foreign talents who cannot speak English to replace old lady citizens for cleaning our tables.

Oh, btw, 20,000 will be digestible.

Crises can't be overcome with just good governance: Lee Kuan Yew

<b:if cond="data:blog.pageType != "static_page""></b:if>By Victoria Barker
my paper
Thursday, Sep 15, 2011

In times of trouble, good governance alone is not enough to solve problems, former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew said last night.
He was responding to a question on how his views on good governance have been shaped by recent developments in the United States and Europe.

Why does the media now calls him "former prime minister" instead of "former minister mentor"?
 
the past week has shown he's still as sharp with his response when it comes to pointy questions.

Sharp? Singaporeans are simply too too blunt. Look at the way he regards poliical awareness. It fits a graduate of political science far more than an ordinary man. You mean you guys agree with this view? I thought it was a case of nobody wanted (dared) to argue with him.
 
Yes, we do. Without them, your plate of char kwee tiow might cost upwards of $10.00 per plate. If you don't want that you must accept the FT.
When they tell you nobody wanted to work as cleaners, they didn't tell you the pay offered. Pay locals $150.00 per day and they will queue for it. Do you want that or a semblance of it.
 
Good question. I was kinda asking myself too. maybe the "former PM" reference sounds better and clearer to accidental and incidental readers, businessmen, journalists, embassies etc. who never cared abt Singapore anyway so never followed his career path all that well.

Why does the media now calls him "former prime minister" instead of "former minister mentor"?
 
A lot of people there at the forum asked dumbfucked questions with self-evident answers even my 3 yr old grandson could answer. They were self-serving questions and continue to put him on that pedestal and Singaporeans like us ought to be kicked in our asses. Most dont ask incisive enough questions. If I were there, I would ask him in the most polite manner, if I could paraphrase what he said as meaning that we imported all these migrants with so much talents that they are fighting with Old Ah Ems and Ah Pors for cleaning tables? And I wont yield my floor until I am answered, or carried bodily out of the auditorium by his bodyguards or security. that would be some drama to liven up the sterile air.

You see, my question is in fact a statement and I got to score a point via a hit-and-run tactic. You know with this guy he'll put you down if you give him as much as a gasp.

For all the things you may criticize about the old man, the past week has shown he's still as sharp with his response when it comes to pointy questions. No point charging directly at him with a shinai, it'll be deflected. Over time however, he'll surely make a misstep. It will take a swashbuckler to get a hit after several rounds of parries and thrusts. Legislators ought to learn from the maestro LTK to complement their own strengths.
 
Last edited:
Yes, yes and YES! Much as I cringed at the responses former MM dished out, I couldn't help but feel that a lot of the people posing them were setting themselves up to be screwed. The problem is, Singaporeans attend such events with the mindset of inferior beings and accordingly, adopt the attitude of petitioners - "will your Majesty deign to consider your faithful servant's most humble plea?" - instead of being critical and incisive.

Recall also the NTU forum and the PhD student Joan Sim's question about promoting social cohesion in the face of increasing numbers of immigrants. It was completely sidestepped, and turned into (what I consider) a sexist spiel about how a woman was only as good as her reproductive functions. And having being "put into place", I don't suppose Sim had the guts to press home the point that her question was NEVER answered. Not that I blame her, really. We have been so conditioned to live in the mental cells the establishment created that we become our own jailers.

With that in mind, I'm not even sure why people even bother to attend such forums. Their purpose is never to engage the people, but for us lesser mortals to demonstrate our fealty to these higher beings, and in return, for the higher beings to dispense their wisdom to us lesser mortals.

A lot of people there at the forum asked dumbfucked questions with self-evident answers even my 3 yr old grandson could answer. They were self-serving questions and continue to put him on that pedestal and Singaporeans like us ought to be kicked in our asses. Most dont ask incisive enough questions. If I were there, I would ask him in the most polite manner, if I could paraphrase what he said as meaning that we imported all these migrants with so much talents that they are fighting with Old Ah Ems and Ah Pors for cleaning tables? And I wont yield my floor until I am answered, or carried bodily out of the auditorium by his bodyguards or security. that would be some drama to liven up the sterile air.

You see, my question is in fact a statement and I got to score a point via a hit-and-run tactic. You know with this guy he'll put you down if you give him as much as a gasp.
 
Politicallt correct,

a lot of people careless about his presence perhaps they were conned to listen to a daft Former PM. Those who asked daft questions are just there to have fun. No use throwing serious questions to him when they know he can up lorry anytime and become news blamed for his death.



A lot of people there at the forum asked dumbfucked questions with self-evident answers even my 3 yr old grandson could answer. They were self-serving questions and continue to put him on that pedestal and Singaporeans like us ought to be kicked in our asses. Most dont ask incisive enough questions. If I were there, I would ask him in the most polite manner, if I could paraphrase what he said as meaning that we imported all these migrants with so much talents that they are fighting with Old Ah Ems and Ah Pors for cleaning tables? And I wont yield my floor until I am answered, or carried bodily out of the auditorium by his bodyguards or security. that would be some drama to liven up the sterile air.

You see, my question is in fact a statement and I got to score a point via a hit-and-run tactic. You know with this guy he'll put you down if you give him as much as a gasp.
 
To be honest, we need foreigners to do the low level jobs, this will keep cost low for the Singaporeans. However middle class jobs, etc needs to be reserved for Singaporeans 1st. This will boost domestic incomes and increase spending power. Its tricky why the old man never mentions about these middle income jobs going to foreigners?..
 
because it is easier to justify importing the lower skilled ones. Remember him saying who are going to build yr flats and clean yr streets? That's the game they'll play with the voters.

Its tricky why the old man never mentions about these middle income jobs going to foreigners?..
 
Last edited:
Back
Top