- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 515
- Points
- 43
Some people just assume everything's Ok and "very correct" with Einstein's theory. All the professors from the top universities - including Tsinghua and Peking U from China - are teaching Einstein's physics in their regular curriculum. Could they be all wrong? You only read and hear - every so often - that another NASA experiment confirms Einstein's theory. Such confirmation is like news in the Muslim world that "...experimental evidence have been found that the US is an evil empire accurate to 1 part in 10¹⁰".
People like to say science - especially a physical science such as physics - is founded strictly on scientific evidence. Physical evidence cannot lie...they cannot talk... but man can talk and lie. When pastor Kong Hee went to the court, his "accounting evidence" were all overruled by the courts. True science is surely founded only on experimental evidence, but if the group of 6/7 scientists at the top of CERN were crooks deciding on whether the Higgs boson exists, they don't need any data from their run of their super LHC collider, they need just a show of hands : "Have we discovered the Higgs boson?" Big science nowadays is very often based on a political process, not experimental evidence.
https://www.big-lies.org/modern-physics-a-fraud/modern-physics.html#bomb
"The thesis of this piece is that, in fact, the invention of the atomic bomb was almost entirely empirical. Fairly simple new concepts of the nucleus, electrons, neutrons, atomic weights etc. sufficed. Specifically, ‘e=mc 2 ’, quantum ideas, uncertainty in measurement and the more elaborate mathematics had no effect on the discoveries leading to the invention; these discoveries each came as a complete surprise. The link with ‘modern physics’ is a myth. If Einstein had never lived, atomic weapons could have been developed exactly as they were."
"CERN Particle physics all wrong"
Dr. Alexander Unzicker at the 2nd Rational Physics Conference in Salzburg-Austria, 2014.
Chan Rasjid.
"Einstein's Physics All Wrong"
http://www.emc2fails.com
People like to say science - especially a physical science such as physics - is founded strictly on scientific evidence. Physical evidence cannot lie...they cannot talk... but man can talk and lie. When pastor Kong Hee went to the court, his "accounting evidence" were all overruled by the courts. True science is surely founded only on experimental evidence, but if the group of 6/7 scientists at the top of CERN were crooks deciding on whether the Higgs boson exists, they don't need any data from their run of their super LHC collider, they need just a show of hands : "Have we discovered the Higgs boson?" Big science nowadays is very often based on a political process, not experimental evidence.
https://www.big-lies.org/modern-physics-a-fraud/modern-physics.html#bomb
"The thesis of this piece is that, in fact, the invention of the atomic bomb was almost entirely empirical. Fairly simple new concepts of the nucleus, electrons, neutrons, atomic weights etc. sufficed. Specifically, ‘e=mc 2 ’, quantum ideas, uncertainty in measurement and the more elaborate mathematics had no effect on the discoveries leading to the invention; these discoveries each came as a complete surprise. The link with ‘modern physics’ is a myth. If Einstein had never lived, atomic weapons could have been developed exactly as they were."
"CERN Particle physics all wrong"
Dr. Alexander Unzicker at the 2nd Rational Physics Conference in Salzburg-Austria, 2014.
Chan Rasjid.
"Einstein's Physics All Wrong"
http://www.emc2fails.com
