• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Finally, Sunshine Empire Charged

Y

Yip Hon

Guest
>


221111



Sunshine Empire's appeals dismissed
Straits Times
Yasmine Yahya





HIGH Court Justice Tay Yong Kwang criticised the Sunshine Empire scam as a 'well thought-out scheme designed to defraud participants under an aura of legitimacy and respectability' in a written judgment issued yesterday.

Justice Tay made the comment in a 31-page written judgment upholding the findings, convictions and sentences handed down by District Judge Jasvender Kaur last year.

It means company founder James Phang Wah, 51, will start serving his nine-year jail term next month. He had been given a fine of $60,000 in July last year. Former director Jackie Hoo Choon Cheat, 31, was sentenced to a seven-year term.

Phang's wife, Neo Kuon Huay, 48, was fined $60,000 for falsifying payment vouchers.

Sunshine was a multi-level marketing company that sold 'lifestyle packages' promising high returns. But the returns did not come out of genuine profits but by recycling funds from new participants.

In upholding the sentences handed out to the three, Justice Tay said he agreed with Judge Kaur's finding that Sunshine 'was an unsustainable business and that Phang and Hoo were knowingly perpetrating a fraud on the participants by the operation of the Sunshine Empire scheme'.

He also agreed with her that Phang and Hoo had made unlawful payments to Neo.

Neo was paid a commission of nearly $950,000 as the firm's global sales director, although she had not been appointed to the role and was not qualified to hold it, he wrote.

Judge Kaur was also correct in finding that Phang and Neo had committed a dishonest act in falsifying six payment vouchers in order to receive commissions amounting to nearly $1 million, Justice Tay ruled.

He said in his written judgment that these sentences 'should serve as sufficient deterrence against such offences'.

The three had appealed to the High Court against their convictions. Phang and Hoo also appealed against their sentences. The prosecution, meanwhile, wanted longer prison terms for Phang and Hoo and pushed for Neo to be sentenced to six months' jail.

Yesterday, Justice Tay agreed to defer Phang and Hoo's jail sentence by three weeks to let them settle their personal and business affairs and to allow them to spend some time with their families.

The court heard yesterday that Phang's father is suffering from kidney failure and might have to undergo surgery to have both his legs amputated and there is a chance Phang will not see him anymore after he goes to jail.

It was also told that Hoo has a grandmother in Malaysia who is 94 and ailing. She will come to Singapore to see him before he starts his sentence.

Sunshine is being wound up. The Commercial Affairs Department has seized about $21 million and will establish how the funds should be disbursed to the firm's creditors.
 

cocobobo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sunshine is being wound up. The Commercial Affairs Department has seized about $21 million and will establish how the funds should be disbursed to the firm's creditors.

creditors get something back.
investors....nothing.
 

chowka

Alfrescian
Loyal

Remaining charges against Sunshine Empire trio dropped
By Alvina Soh | Posted: 19 January 2012 1846 hrs

sunshine-sphe.jpg


The prosecution withdrew the remaining charges against the Sunshine Empire trio who were tried and convicted in 2010. A district court heard on Jan 19 that James Phang Wah (right) , Jackie Hoo Choon Cheat, and Phang's wife Neo Kuon Huay (left) have been issued a stern warning by the police -- PHOTO: SPH

SINGAPORE: The remaining charges against the Sunshine Empire trio, who were convicted in 2010, were withdrawn by the prosecution on Thursday.

This, after all three were given a stern warning by the police.

The head of the now-defunct multi-level marketing firm, 51-year-old Phang Wah, was sentenced to nine years' jail and fined S$60,000 in July 2010.

Phang's wife, Neo Kuon Huay, was also fined S$60,000 for her involvement in the fraudulent business, while former-company director, Jackie Hoo Choon Cheat was jailed seven years.

A charge against Phang and Hoo for failing to keep proper accounts was dropped. In addition, Phang and his wife no longer face a charge for providing a misleading statement to the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA).

Three additional charges against Phang for possessing more than 200 uncensored and obscene films were also dropped.

-CNA/ac

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/XJz4rd4vXJ4?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
 
Last edited:

chowka

Alfrescian
Loyal

Sunshine Empire's case to go up to Court of Appeal


Published on Jan 30, 2012

The High Court on Monday allowed Sunshine Empire's boss James Phang Wah (above) to raise questions about the legality of his conviction to the Court of Appeal.

By Khushwant Singh

The High Court on Monday allowed Sunshine Empire's boss James Phang Wah to raise questions about the legality of his conviction to the Court of Appeal. The founder of the now defunct multi-level firm was jailed 4 1/2 years in 2010 for running a fraudulent business under the Companies Act.

He was also jailed another 4 1/2 years and fined $60,000 for criminal breach of trust. He is presently serving the nine-year sentence. If the Court of Appeal's decision goes his way, the conviction under the Companies Act could be quashed or a new trial may be ordered.

Up for scrutiny for the Court of Appeal is whether Phang knowingly carried on Sunshine's business with a fraudulent purpose in mind. In the trial in the district court, he was found to have sold packages yielding high returns when in fact Sunshine did not operate any substantive profit-generating business, and had no sustainable means of funding such returns.

The lower court also found Phang knew these payouts would have been unsustainable when he continued the business.

Read the full story in Monday's edition of The Straits Times.

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gFHLAd5-k6s?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 
Last edited:
Top