Fare reviews should not be linked to service levels and disruptions: Chee Hong Tat

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
9,138
Points
113
Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat said on Oct 15 that the Public Transport Council had considered and decided against linking fare reviews to service levels and disruptions due to there being other measures in place to ensure standards are met.

What the fuck? In this case, what is called KPI? If their performance is not up to expectation, why should the commuters be paying more instead of commensurate to their service levels and amount of disruptions during every year of assessment? Really this PAP government nowadays cannot be fucked anymore.
 
Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat said on Oct 15 that the Public Transport Council had considered and decided against linking fare reviews to service levels and disruptions due to there being other measures in place to ensure standards are met.

What the fuck? In this case, what is called KPI? If their performance is not up to expectation, why should the commuters be paying more instead of commensurate to their service levels and amount of disruptions during every year of assessment? Really this PAP government nowadays cannot be fucked anymore.
Things break down. It happens even in London. Not sure if trains break down in Japan and Switzerland as that is on another level.
 
Likewise, salary reviews should not be linked to work performance and any operational challenges that may arise. right? LOL
 
This is what happened when you vote PAP into power every 5 years.

OIG.jpg
 
these are just outright smooth talking parasites......dont be angry, not good for your health, i am 100% sure once he off camera, he will laugh at his own sales pitch
 
Should not? It never was.

Oh, and your 'revisions' only go one direction. Take a wild guess which. :wink:
 
Should be linked….if more breakdowns SMRT workers have to do overtime to fix.

More costs associated to breakdowns and hence in fact fare should go up.
 
Back
Top