• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

FAP Tried to Frighten Off Madam Vallema - And Backfired!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=2]Madam Vallema will have her Day in Court[/h]Posted by theonlinecitizen on May 13, 2012 59 Comments
<!--end: postmeta-->
<!-- AddThis Button Begin -->

~ By Cheong Yaoming ~

In light of the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) response from The Straits Times article (12th May 2012, 'Bid for open court hearing withdrawn'), Madam Vellama has decided to press on with her lawsuit. This unexpected turn of events seems to have been spurred by the AGC statement that Madam Vella's "…proceedings are ill-conceived to begin with, and if they are continued, Madam Vellama risks being penalised in costs".​
She is now determined to resolve the constitutional question – Does the Prime Minister have unfetterd executive powers relating to the matter of by-elections? As a matter of principle not just for herself but for the democratic rights of all Singaporeans.
Letter to AGC 13th May 2012


<!-- START DONATE -->[h=2]HELP keep the voice of TOC alive![/h]If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.
<!-- END Donate -->

<!--end: tags-->
<!--end: entry--><!-- You can start editing here. -->[h=3]59 Responses to “Madam Vallema will have her Day in Court”[/h]
 
Top