• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

FAP Traitors Trashed SG Productivity to Perpetuate 1 Familee Rule

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=2]Productivity in Singapore on the decline[/h]

dmca_protected_sml_120n.png

PostDateIcon.png
June 15th, 2013 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Contributions




productivity-chart-dipping-2010.jpg
In the news, the productivity rate in Singapore on the
decline even through the our GDP is increasing with ever-increasing of workforce mainly
from other countries.

Based on Wikipedia:

Productivity is the ratio of output to inputs in
production; it is a measure of the efficiency of production.

Productivity has many benefits. At the national level, productivity growth raises living standards because more real
income
improves people’s ability to purchase goods and services, enjoy
leisure, improve housing and education and contribute to social and
environmental programs. Productivity growth is important to the firm because
more real income means that the firm can meet its (perhaps growing) obligations
to customers, suppliers, workers, shareholders, and governments (taxes and
regulation), and still remain competitive or even improve its competitiveness in
the market place.

So the main question is: Why there is a decline in productivity
despite more manpower and employee putting in man hours?


According the Gilbert Goh in transitioning .org, our workers are overly
exploited
. Yes, it’s overly exploited!!! I have come across PMET
working every day from 9am till 1am the next day and the pay is pathetic.

Now I’m not going to talk about pay in here. I’m more interested in the real
reason behind the decline of productivity decline.

1) More foreigner than local. Lots of foreigners are coming to
Singapore to work.


We all know that in the service sectors like food industry, phone operators,
construction worker and PMET. We don’t hate foreigners but the rate of
foreigners coming into Singapore at such an astonishing rate, thus skill level
of the foreigners are on the decline.

Quoting an example, in the telephone operators, mainly operated by the Pinoy
and the Indian, like LTA, Banks, Singtel etc. Ask yourself a question: How many
time do you need to call the operators to solve your problem comparing 10 years
ago and now?

For me, I had to call Singtel, or DBS at least 2 to 3 times before my problem
is solved. That why, today I only speaks to local operators.

Companies are arguing that local do not want to be telephone operators.
Somewhat I agreed. Being a phone operator, they need to endure to nasty and rude
customers. That’s not the main problem. The main problem is the pay. How much do
the company willing to pay before a local consider this as a job? Less than a
thousand dollars pay will continue let the companies into difficulties in
getting locals to work in that industry.

Why not the companies pay a bit more like $1500 to $2000 to engage the local
to work as telephone operators? As telephone operators are “Cost Center” to
them, they would like to minimise the cost as low as possible. But in return,
they had a trade-off of low productivity. This translate into productivity cost
the company itself and productivity of the caller as well.

Also another reason the could be: telephone operators (foreign
operators) work with their head but not their soul (This is what I feel). They
do not really understand what our problem well and we had to repeat and repeat
again to get the message through.

This kind of problems we had faced day-in day-out in today’s context. Not
just in the telephone operators but in the service industry .

2) Too many Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)

In order to safe guard the company or industry interest, there is always a
SOP for all to follow. Don’t get me wrong! SOP is a must have to safe guard the
interest of the company. But complicated SOP will sometime leads to employee
confused themselves. Thus they need to ask around to make sure that they
are following the SOP closely. This is total waste of time and man hours for the
company.

A general and simple SOP will enough for all the employee to follows thus
allowing more free play by the employees and easy understanding by them. Reduce
unnecessary paperwork so they can cut their workload in a single case.

3) Top-down micro management

The top management do not really trust their subordinates and any questions
and procedure that are out of the SOP need to sought the approval from the
management. This create an unnecessary time wastage as subordinates are afraid
of infringing the SOP set down by the management.

Sometime, when a decision finalised and pass the information down. Often than
not, subordinates just follows and don’t question them. They are afraid to bring
out the concern to the management about the decision made mainly afraid of
offending their management.

Communication is a two-way thing and it is not a top-down communication.
Management should not feel threaten when a concern raised.

4) Job Hopping

There is a trend that job hopping is on the raise. This really bring down the
productivity rate of the company as they need to hire new staff, train them all
over again to get them familiarise with the working system in the company.

Company should work together with the employees. It must treat the employees
as a family members. Employees must have balance work-life. Employees are not
the slave of the company and don’t expect them to serve you 24/7. They have
their families too. Money is never the major issue if the company creates a good
work-life environment for their employees.

Why people job hopped is mainly due to work stress and lack of work-life
balance. Money is another reason that people job-hopped, given all companies
lack of work-life balance, they will choose the company with the higher
compensation of their pay.

Given a choice, would an employee work-life balance company job hopped to
another company that offer slightly higher package but with higher stress level
and lack of work-life balance? Most properly not as they will tend to enjoy
their work in the current company than going to other company. People will also
resist changes to their current lifestyle (if given a work-life balance
environment).

In order to increase productivity of the company, work-life balance is the
way to go. Companies should treat their employees as family, retain staff and
open management (open discussion with subordinates). Without all these factors,
GDP will only continue to increase with the ever-increasing manpower.

.

New Bird

* The author blogs at http://mrnewbird.wordpress.com/
 
July 4, 2013,
Asia Trails When It Comes to Innovation.
When it comes to innovation, Asia seems to be far behind.

According to a recent study ....no Asian countries were among the top five most innovative economies in the world. The Global Innovation Index 2013 showed Southeast Asia trailing behind Europe and North America.......The study examined 84 measures like university performance, infrastructure, institutions and venture capital.

....Asian economies averaged weaker institutions, human capital and research than North America and Europe. Hong Kong was the highest ranked Asian economy in the study at 7th, while Singapore ranked 8th, down from 3rd in 2012.

“This year’s model is better at capturing innovations of quality and impact, and in that regard, the U.S. performs (and probably has always performed) better than Singapore,” writes Bruno Lanvin, co-editor of the report. “The policy implication is evident: Singapore needs to monitor closely the quality and impact of its research, academic, and output activities.”

Switzerland was once again listed as the world’s leader in innovation thanks to its knowledge-based economy and high GDP per capital. Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands placed second, third and fourth respectively, with the United States rounding out the top five.......

The BRICs fell behind this year, with China dropping from 34th to 35th, Russia dropping 11 spots to 62nd, Brazil dropping six spots to 64th and India falling two spots to 66th.

At the same time, the study’s analysts point out that emerging markets have increased their research and development investments faster than high-income countries, especially China, Argentina, Brazil, Poland, India, Russia, Turkey, and South Africa......

China now leads in patent filings and has outperformed most of its income group.

According to the study, China and other emerging markets are making up an increasing share of global patents, though authors later warn that “the number of patent applications filed is not always a good proxy for how commercially valuable the inventions underlying the patents really are.”
While China ranked 1st in national patent office applications, it also, for instance, ranked 124th in ease of starting a business..............

The top 10 innovators are:

Switzerland
Sweden
UK
Netherlands
US
Finland
Hong Kong (China)
Singapore
Denmark
Ireland
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/07...F04%2Fasia-trails-when-it-comes-to-innovation

When you are serious about improving you normally import talents from countries above you (to learn from them i.e transfer of knowledge)
-in this case Switzerland, Sweden, UK, Netherlands, US, Finland.
How many FT's ,new citizens and PR's you have met are from the above countries.?
Instead we import from countries like PRC, India, Pinoyland (ranked 90th) countries all ranked way below us.
Is the pappy ever serious about being a knowledge based economy and increasing productivity ?
The old man already made it clear these are meant to be thorns in our hides.
So when they talk about innovation, productivity, upturn the downturn, where's the integrity and credibility.
 
Last edited:
Brought here to work as thry claim.....or imported as shitizens to vote for them?


Just do an analyss of the voting patterns now and you will discover that the PAP will definitely stay at 60.1 and above in 2016........
 
Cure for Singapore is simple

VOTE ALL THOSE PAP BASTARDS ALL OUT IN 2016
 
Cure for Singapore is simple

In my view, the reason for the decline in productivity is the fact that Singaporeans are getting lazier and putting in less hours while still expecting high salaries.

It is left to the foreigners to pick up the slack and put in the long hours required to make up for the loss of productivity caused by Singaporeans.
 
In my view, the reason for the decline in productivity is the fact that Singaporeans are getting lazier and putting in less hours while still expecting high salaries.

It is left to the foreigners to pick up the slack and put in the long hours required to make up for the loss of productivity caused by Singaporeans.

The decline for productivity is becose PAP maggots and cockroaches creamed and screwed and fucked off hundreds of billions into smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY Stinkapore sovereign funds and their own massive stinking obscene pay
 
In my view, the reason for the decline in productivity is the fact that Singaporeans are getting lazier and putting in less hours while still expecting high salaries.

It is left to the foreigners to pick up the slack and put in the long hours required to make up for the loss of productivity caused by Singaporeans.

It shows that the companies are not interested to invest in technology to achieve better productivity and they got complacent with the cheaper labours over the years. Lazy people can come up with the best innovation you can think of.
 
In my view, the reason for the decline in productivity is the fact that Singaporeans are getting lazier and putting in less hours while still expecting high salaries.

It is left to the foreigners to pick up the slack and put in the long hours required to make up for the loss of productivity caused by Singaporeans.

There are three reasons:

The main reason for poor productivity in Singapore is poor management practices. Singaporean business owners do not invest in automation and training in the way that a US business would. They do not find better ways of doing things except to exhort workers to work, longer , harder, faster. In the end this is counterproductive.

Secondly, instead of investing in productivity we import many poorly skilled foreigners to do technical and service jobs. Yes output can go up but inputs go up faster.

Thirdly, Singaporeans are not intellectually curious and do not develop themselves professionally. As their pay goes up year by year and their output does not ( in either quantity or quality ) productivity takes a dive. This is where the " lazy " Singaporean comes in. He is unwilling to work harder for his higher pay and is beset by wife, children, parents and in law problems. Then there are reservist commitments. Some idiots do not want to pass their IPPT and have to to for training on weekdays, taking hours off from work. These eventually become the wandering sub employed PMETS.
 
Last edited:
In my view, the reason for the decline in productivity is the fact that Singaporeans are getting lazier and putting in less hours while still expecting high salaries.

It is left to the foreigners to pick up the slack and put in the long hours required to make up for the loss of productivity caused by Singaporeans.

brilliant observation as always
singapore rocks round the clock
 
There are three reasons:

There's actually only one reason and I believe it was you who pointed it out:

There are 2 broad categories of people in SG now: those who go for the goodies (pappies and their supporters, followers, PAWS, relatives, close friends, family, groupies, entourage, hangers-on, etc) and the do-gooders (including those who try to increase productivity, think of innovative ideas, try to help people, try to look at the greater good of both society and company and not just themselves and their families, those who try to be as altruistic as naturally selfish humans can be and not just for their own egos or well being, etc)

In SG, the former type thrive.
 
brilliant observation as always
singapore rocks round the clock

Thanks for the compliment. Finally someone who is smart enough to appreciate the wisdom in my posts.

I have added to your points. :)
 
Back
Top