FAP: Singapore needs to take in 20,000 – 25,000 new citizens each year

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=2]White paper: Singapore needs to take in 20,000 – 25,000 new citizens each year[/h]Posted by temasektimes on April 24, 2012
Despite growing concerns among Singaporeans at the relentless influx of foreigners, it appears that the government’s ‘mass-immigration’ policies are likely to continue in the near future.
A paper released by the National Population and Talent Division under the Prime Minster Office proclaimed today that if the country’s Total Fertility Rate remains the same, Singapore would need an immigration inflow of between 20,000-25,000 new citizens each year to keep the citizen population size stable.
It added that with Singapore’s Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of only 1.2, well below the replacement rate of 2.1, citizen deaths will exceed births in 13 years without immigration.
Unlike other developed countries, Singapore has a lax immigration policy in which bus drivers, construction workers, hawkers and even freelance prostitutes are given PR and citizenship.
The population explosion in the last few years driven by immigration has led to sky-rocketing prices of HDB flats, stagnant wages, breakdown of infrastructure like public transport and a noticeable decline in the quality of life.
Back in 2007, then Minister of National Development Mah Bow Tan had set a population target of 7 million people for Singapore before his vision was abandoned in the aftermath of last year’s General Election.
 
Singapore would need an immigration inflow of between 20,000-25,000 new citizens each year to keep the citizen population size stable.

increase 20-25K NEW CITIZENS each year

meaning...
if say 1 in 10 foreigners eventually become citizen, we need 200-250K foreigners coming in each year..:eek:
 
Doesn't matter if it's EP, blue card or pink card.

They are physically here, so expect more congestions, more overcrowding and more social tensions.

Anyway, what the stats glaringly omit is the yearly loss in population due to deaths and emigration, so simply declaring that 'we need 20-25K new citizens each year!' is pulling numbers out of your ass.

Also the weasel word: stable. What do you mean by 'stable'? Has the optimal equilibrium population size been worked out? 5.1 million?
 
I love the title of mods these days. It is getting to be like "duli yang maha mulia sri paduka baginda yang dipertuan" singveld.
 
I love the title of mods these days. It is getting to be like "duli yang maha mulia sri paduka baginda yang dipertuan" singveld.

clone master, go away, not going to talk to retard like you
 
Back
Top