- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
Jun 26, 2010
Another pricing penalty for pay TV sports fans
<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar -->
<!-- story content : start -->
WHILE football fans may have felt that SingTel and StarHub charged exorbitantly for screening the current World Cup matches, there is yet another sports package that bears scrutiny.
This is the new price of an ESPN sports package resulting from ESPN StarSports' switch from StarHub to SingTel's mio TV, next month.
I was shocked to learn that the ESPN package on mio TV costs $24.61, which is the same price viewers pay for the English Premier League (EPL) package; the twin package for ESPN and the EPL is $26.75.
The pricing is baffling, especially when sports fans are told that the major cost for SingTel was the acquisition of broadcasting rights for the EPL. If this is so, why should the ESPN package cost as much as the EPL?
Such pricing also means that ESPN subscribers who are not EPL fans are effectively subsidising the English Premiership payees.
The relevant authorities should examine mio TV's pricing which, on the face of it, seems unfair.
Worse still, mio TV is still unavailable where I live and SingTel will say only that it will be available in July.
Will I be able to catch Formula One's British Grand Prix live from July 10 to 12? No one at SingTel is prepared to guarantee that I will, and I am having serious doubts that I will.
If such is the case, the relevant authorities should intercede and let StarHub continue broadcasting ESPN StarSports until SingTel meets its 100 per cent commitment to wire up Singapore completely.
Furthermore, I was told by SingTel staff that when I am finally mio TV enabled, I must have one telephone line with one modem per set-top box.
This sounds ridiculous as my house has a local area network (LAN) wired up. Why can't mio TV work with one telephone line with a central modem connected to multiple set-top boxes via the LAN?
Is it just another opportunity to charge the customer more? There is absolutely no incentive for me to increase the number of set-top boxes.
Keith Heah
Another pricing penalty for pay TV sports fans
<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar -->

WHILE football fans may have felt that SingTel and StarHub charged exorbitantly for screening the current World Cup matches, there is yet another sports package that bears scrutiny.
This is the new price of an ESPN sports package resulting from ESPN StarSports' switch from StarHub to SingTel's mio TV, next month.
I was shocked to learn that the ESPN package on mio TV costs $24.61, which is the same price viewers pay for the English Premier League (EPL) package; the twin package for ESPN and the EPL is $26.75.
The pricing is baffling, especially when sports fans are told that the major cost for SingTel was the acquisition of broadcasting rights for the EPL. If this is so, why should the ESPN package cost as much as the EPL?
Such pricing also means that ESPN subscribers who are not EPL fans are effectively subsidising the English Premiership payees.
The relevant authorities should examine mio TV's pricing which, on the face of it, seems unfair.
Worse still, mio TV is still unavailable where I live and SingTel will say only that it will be available in July.
Will I be able to catch Formula One's British Grand Prix live from July 10 to 12? No one at SingTel is prepared to guarantee that I will, and I am having serious doubts that I will.
If such is the case, the relevant authorities should intercede and let StarHub continue broadcasting ESPN StarSports until SingTel meets its 100 per cent commitment to wire up Singapore completely.
Furthermore, I was told by SingTel staff that when I am finally mio TV enabled, I must have one telephone line with one modem per set-top box.
This sounds ridiculous as my house has a local area network (LAN) wired up. Why can't mio TV work with one telephone line with a central modem connected to multiple set-top boxes via the LAN?
Is it just another opportunity to charge the customer more? There is absolutely no incentive for me to increase the number of set-top boxes.
Keith Heah