• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious F-35B - A New Chapter In The RSAF's Aerial Mastery Over ASEAN Skies!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset

paul-hattendorf-f-35-pilot.jpg


FORT WORTH, Texas: An F-35 is slicing through the air faster than the speed of sound, but the last thing on the pilot’s mind is the flying itself.

Instead, the pilot is looking at a panoramic view of the world around him, projected on the inside of his helmet visor. This view is crawling with little red triangles, indicating enemy targets on the ground, some as far as hundreds of kilometres away.


One of the triangles is a long-range air defence system, close enough to fire at him and kill him. But the pilot doesn’t care. He knows the enemy cannot see him. He presses forward with his mission, which is to destroy a convoy of enemy vehicles.

Sure enough, four red triangles appear, indicating movement at 10 o’clock. The pilot checks the touchscreen display on his console. It is a single, God’s eye view of everything on the battlefield. It confirms the same targets.

Just to be sure, the pilot moves his computer's cursor over the targets.

The computer tells him that his radar, threat warning system and targeting sensor all see the same thing. It tells him it is 96 per cent sure those targets really are enemy trucks. The computer tells him they are close enough for his bombs to destroy them.

“Pilots are very sceptical people,” Lockheed Martin’s F-35 chief test pilot Paul Hattendorf told Channel NewsAsia on Oct 2, as he stood beside a brand new F-35B that will be delivered to the US Marines.

“You’re targeting stuff, so you’re meaning for that stuff to go away. So, you want as much validation of everything that you can get.”

The pilot is confident.

He knows this information is accurate because the computer isn’t using just the sensors on his plane, but also the sensors on other F-35s, which might be somewhere out there.

This means that F-35 pilots don’t need to talk to each other. The planes are doing all the talking, over a secure channel that’s extremely difficult to jam or intercept. And the computer is pulling it all together.

The pilot moves in for the kill.

f-35-bomb.jpg


He pulls up a view from his forward-looking infrared camera, which zooms in on the enemy trucks and projects as a picture within a picture on his helmet-mounted display. This sensor automatically locks on the targets. The pilot flicks a switch and four small-diameter precision bombs drop out of his bay.

The trucks erupt in a cloud of flame and dust.

This is roughly how a real mission scenario might play out, based on footage from the pilot's helmet producer, Rockwell Collins ESA Vision Systems.

And it is certainly plausible with the F-35’s stealth, sensor fusion and Distributed Aperture System (DAS).

DAS, comprising six cameras placed around the jet, stitches the video together and projects it on the inside of the pilot’s helmet visor, allowing him to see through the jet in all directions.

“It’s a really neat capability and technology advancement,” Hattendorf said of the DAS. “In an F-16, you had to roll the aircraft to look down.”

The lack of sensor fusion in the fourth-generation F-16 also means that its pilots saw different symbols from different sensors for the same target. So, they had to compare the information and assess what’s really out there.

“In a legacy aircraft, the mainframe computer is really (the pilot’s brain) figuring it all out,” Hattendorf said. “Now, sensor fusion presents a common picture where he can focus on being the tactician and servicing the target.”

And when Hattendorf compares the F-35 to the F-16, he’s speaking from tons of experience. The former US Air Force pilot has flown the F-16 for more than three decades, clocking more than 4,000 hours on the jet. He has 600 hours on the F-35, having first flown it in 2012.

This comparison is also important because Singapore is evaluating the F-35s as a potential replacement for its F-16s. The country is reportedly interested in the B variant of the jet, which can take off from shorter runways and land vertically.

f-35-fully-loaded.jpg


But how does the F-35 perform in close aerial combat with other jets? “It has very predictable flying qualities which make it easier for the pilots to fly,” Hattendorf replied. “This aircraft is not going to go out of control.”

There are weak points. Because of its large internal fuel tank, an F-35 might be carrying more fuel than the enemy. This extra weight puts it at a disadvantage when trying to turn quickly, Hattendorf acknowledged.

Still, an F-35 fully loaded with weapons and fuel can “manoeuvre with abandon”, as Hattendorf puts it. This is because its flight controls are so advanced, computers take care of the jet's weight and balance as the pilot pushes it to its limits.

This means that a pilot being pursued from the rear can slam the throttle forward and pull the jet up sharply, pointing its nose 50 degrees against the sky. Blood rushes to his head and gravity crushes his insides. But it’s all worth it as the enemy will struggle to follow.

For example the F-16, hampered by its structural limits, can only climb at a much shallower angle when fully laden with weapons and fuel, Hattendorf said. Anything more might make the jet lose control and risk crashing into the ground.

And if the F-35 pilot can turn and get somewhere behind the enemy, he could finish it off. At this point, he doesn’t even need to point his nose at the jet, Hattendorf added. All he needs to do is to look.

The helmet’s cueing system locks on the jet. The pilot flips another switch.

One AIM-9X missile, equipped with high off-boresight capabilities that mean it can hit a target that’s not directly in front, hisses out of the F-35 and charges towards the enemy.

The rest is history.

When that's done, landing the F-35 is also a piece of cake, Hattendorf said. He’s had no problems controlling the jet’s speed and descent rate, even in strong winds. In contrast, landing the F-16 “required a lot more” pilot skill.

“I’d say half of my landings on the F-35, I don’t even know I’ve touched down, because it’s that smooth,” he added. “The pilot can pretty much let go of his hands.”

Performing a vertical landing on the B variant, which uses a lift fan and swivelling nozzle, is just as simple. “We have a lot of automation that makes life really easy in STOVL (short take-off/vertical landing),” Hattendorf said.

Comparing it to the STOVL-capable Harrier jet, which uses bleed air to land vertically, Hattendorf added: “Harrier pilots must use a lot of effort and bandwidth from their brains.”

The veteran pilot, who’s flown more than 50 types of aircraft in his life, makes the F-35 sound like an aviator’s dream. “This is the easiest aircraft I’ve ever flown in my life.”

f-35-vertical-landing.jpg

Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/f35-fighter-jet-pilot-experience-combat-10821506
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
Only Chiak Sai idiot will spend a single dollar on expensive and useless junk like F-35!


Ah Tiong Planes most advanced, and effective and cheap. Ang Mohs are unable to catch up Ah Tiong Technologies.

 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singkieland would Be better off working with the Israelis to upgrade the F16...cheaperer betterer n longer range...the f35 is not maneuverable, short range n light payload. It is useless as a bomber

 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Now we know why jiu hu avoid buying american weapons. They bought russian ones that cannot fly. Its like a scarecrow to frighten the enemy. But at least its cheap.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
v2

Skip to:Main ContentSite NavigationSite footerSite Map


v2

Australia’s biggest defence mistake that will cost us billions

OCTOBER 23, 20181:28pm



Play Video
Play
0:00
/
1:16
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
Fullscreen
Australia welcomes the new F-35 fighter jet
b54682581905c23ea7a9cce1ab4056e8

cf3843835ebc1882dc09c785257e7f3b

Rhian Deutrom
news.com.au
AUSTRALIA has been locked into a “dud deal” by the US, which experts predict will put taxpayers billions of dollars out of pocket and leave the nation’s security dangerously exposed.
The F-35 stealth fighter jet program is the most expensive defence project in global history.
The US project involves the manufacture and rollout of the super jets, which have been described as the “iPhone of fighter jets”.

The fifth-generation aircraft were originally sold to major partner nations, including the UK, Italy, Canada and Denmark, on the strength of their “invisibility” or stealth.
The aircraft features concealed missiles and bombs and can fly at a top speed of 1900km/h.
Engineers claim the jets are able to avoid enemy detection, allowing allied pilots to get much closer to their targets before striking.
adca6b29cfa5c0dfb1c83d62dde105e0

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter can fly at a top speed of 1900km/h.Source:Supplied
The Australian Federal Government has committed to spending $17 billion on 72 jetsdue to be built in the US and delivered by 2035.
Ten of the jets have been built so far and are they sitting at the Luke Air Force Base in Arizona.
The first two will be delivered to Australia in December.
But as the nation awaits its cargo, our own jets are near the end of their service life and the F-35 program faces criticism over major delays and faults.
These delays have, in turn, blown the project’s global budget out more than $163 billion, leaving Australia in a precarious financial situation.
So why has this defence project been described as a “dud deal” for Australia?
3e9d560c76225625124660e719725e62

US President Donald Trump inspects an F-35 fighter plane at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona, where Australia’s 10 jets await delivery. Picture: Nicholas KammSource:AFP

DELAYS
The F-35 program was officially launched in 2001 but it dates back to the 1990s.
It has, so far, failed to meet many of its development targets and continues to rack up additional costs with each problem it encounters.
The fighter jets cost a staggering $140 million each and have been plagued by computer system failures, software delays and breakdowns.
University of NSW defence technology expert Jai Galliott said the jets were fast becoming outdated due to the delays.
“By the time we have fully operational fleets of these aircraft, their skills will be significantly less than what might have been the case back when we signed the deal,” Dr Galliott said.
While he acknowledged the F-35’s stealth was “excellent”, Dr Galliott said technological sacrifices were made to achieve that unnecessary feature in the process.
“The project is over-budget so there are concerns that corners have been cut in production to ensure it doesn’t go too far over budget,” he said.
3649715aaa2f33895ad63e9114e02675

Experts warn the F-35 jet is fast becoming obsolete due to major delays in the program’s rollout. Picture: ADFSource:Supplied
Over the years, problems were identified in the lack of oxygen pilots received, tyres were ripped apart on impact and computer systems failed repeatedly.
The most recent failure involved a US F-35 stealth fighter crashing during a training exercise outside Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort in South Carolina last month.
The pilot was safely ejected from the aircraft but all F-35 jets, including Australia’s small fleet, were grounded while an investigation was carried out, pushing out the deadline and cost even further.
The investigation concluded the crash was due to a faulty fuel tube, sparking further inspections.
An Australian Defence Department spokeswoman told news.com.au that “all of Australia’s F-35A aircraft have now been inspected”.
“Two were found to be fitted with suspect hydraulic fuel tubes which will be replaced,” the spokeswoman said.
“All non-affected Australian aircraft have been cleared to fly.”
The spokeswoman confirmed the safety inspections had no impact on the delivery of the first two jets to Australia on December 10.
Dr Galliott said that, while the US had been quick to cover up technical problems and tout the F-35’s capabilities in combat, the weapons industry was rapidly moving away from pilot-operated battle planes.
“It will take such a long time to sort out all the problems and train people up that we could have built or purchased an unmanned combat aerial vehicle instead,” Dr Galliott said.
13593b332b80c94956919d2d8354cefb

One F-35A strike fighter will set you back around AUD $140 million Picture: Tracey NearmySource:AAP
THE COST
To put the sheer size of the F-35 fighter project into perspective, the program’s budget blowout alone is the equivalent of three National Broadband Networks.
It is 77 times more expensive than the new Royal Adelaide Hospital, which opened last month.
58324ad123f176fa791c18e571a79139

The F-35 budget blowout is 77 times more expensive than the massive new Royal Adelaide Hospital.Source:Supplied
It is the same as about 30 Cross River Rail projects.
A new runway, currently being constructed at the Brisbane Airport, would have to be built more than 125 times to even get close to the cost of the F-35 fighter program.
And remember, that is just the additional spend on top of the project’s budget.
Considering each F-35 jet costs more than $140 million, this is one of the most expensive global weapons collaborations Australia has ever committed to.
So, why did we sign on that dotted line, when major infrastructure projects such as hospitals, trains and aeroplanes cost so little to build in comparison?
Dr Galliott said we did it to keep our mates in the US happy.
“This deal was a dud from the start,” he said.
“I mean, how much should you have to pay to have your best buddy come and protect you?”
The Australian Defence Force declined to answer questions from news.com.au about the cost of the project and the impact it would have on the Australian taxpayer.
bb4c7145b075b56de92acd9de01a2923

Defence Industry Minister Christopher Pyne, former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and Defence Minister Marise Payne smile and nod in front of an F-35 jet. Picture: Tracey NearmySource:AAP
THE DEAL
Dr Galliott said Australia’s commitment to the F-35 jet program was a strategic one, designed to appease our US allies.
“The Defence Force and the government were always in a tricky position with this deal, our hands were always tied,” he said.
As a small developed nation, Australia can’t afford to defend itself against an attack and, as such, needs to rely on its allies.
The largest and oldest ally we have is the US.
“In that sense, perhaps this was a wise decision, but every other part of me says this was a dud deal from the start,” Dr Galliott said.
Recently, the US has been critical of Australia’s economic ties with China, and this deal was a way for the government to strengthen relations.
“There was too much to lose between Australia and the US; it wouldn’t have looked good for us to say no,” he said.
And so, rather than put our American allies off-side, Australia sacrificed better, stronger, newer jets in favour of a geopolitical handshake.
“It was all strategic. This deal ensured we would get a strategic relationship and a half decent aeroplane,” he said.
“But when you think about it, it’s not the best bang for your buck.”
- Continue the conversation with Rhian Deutrom on Twitter@Rhi_lani
v2


read next





First-of-its-kind apartment design
FORGET everything you thought you knew about apartment design – this Melbourne property developer is doing things differently.
SPONSORED CONTENT



JUMP BACK TO TOP

Newsletters
Follow us
A NOTE ABOUT RELEVANT ADVERTISING: We collect information about the content (including ads) you use across this site and use it to make both advertising and content more relevant to you on our network and other sites.Find out more about our policy and your choices, including how to opt-out.

News Limited Copyright © 2018. All times AEDT (GMT +11).




v2
campaigns.json
89641090fc2a72b7f3cee8f91f652ea6
newscorp.gif
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wow....pap actually going all out to sell the F35 to the pubics.....

Skip Navigation
Main navigation and Meta Navigation
To Home
Meta Main Navigation
  • OpenAll SectionsAll SectionsClose






Singapore Edition International Edition








F-35: How the fifth-generation fighter jet might take RSAF to the next level




SingaporeF-35: How the fifth-generation fighter jet might take RSAF to the next level
In the first of a three-part series on the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, Channel NewsAsia’s Aqil Haziq Mahmud visited Lockheed Martin’s production facility for an in-depth look at the fighter jet and how it could be a battlefield game changer.
image: 
An F-35A taking off on a validation flight. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)
By Aqil Haziq Mahmud
20 Oct 2018 06:23AM(Updated: 25 Oct 2018 08:11PM)
Share this content



Bookmark
FORT WORTH, Texas: At the end of a highly sensitive assembly line, in the nave of an enormous aviation paint shop, lay a hulking lump of metal grey aluminium and titanium.
It was a war machine that showed some qualities of an expensive sports car, with sleek lines, perfect symmetry and a matte finish. But looks didn't mask the fact that this fighter jet is designed to be ultra deadly.

The F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter is so advanced, it can “talk” to other aircraft, see the enemy earlier and avoid being seen better than ever before. It can hunt discreetly in packs or be the all-seeing eye in the sky.
This fifth-generation fighter, according to defence experts, is also one of Singapore’s top choices to replace its ageing F-16s.

image:

While Singapore's interest in the F-35 is well-documented, it is still evaluating various options to update its fighter capabilities. In June, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said a decision would be made in the coming months.

Advertisement


image: 
A row of unfinished F-35s sit along the assembly line, where photos are strictly not allowed. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

To find out why Singapore might be willing to spend more than S$160 million on each short take-off/vertical landing variant of the jet, Channel NewsAsia visited manufacturer Lockheed Martin’s sprawling facility in Fort Worth, Texas.
READ: A commentary on the Republic of Singapore Air Force's likely new fighter jet

Along the 1.6km assembly line, in a cold and cavernous space, hundreds of workers cut, drill and screw on chunks of earthy green metal, ramping up production for programme partners and customers like Australia, Italy and South Korea.
It is only in the aviation paint shop that the benign green turns to menacing grey, with workers giving the jet a primer layer before robots spray on the top coat. Every seal and seam needs to be meticulously filled and taped so radars don't pick up on the bumps.
“It's a little bit like painting your house,” said Lockheed Martin's F-35 international business development director Steve Over, peering through a small window and into a vast hangar where the jets were getting some final touches.
“This is where these airplanes receive their stealth coating system.”
STEALTH
Clearly, the F-35’s builders went to great lengths to ensure the jet is close to invisible when in the air. Unlike the fourth-generation F-16, the F-35 conceals all its weapons and fuel tanks inside its sleek skin.
However, F-35s flying in missions that don't require a high level of stealth can still carry external fuel tanks and weapons for more range and firepower.

image:

“The vast majority of radar return that I get from an airplane comes from all the things that are hanging on the outside,” Mr Over said.
The F-35’s antennas are also embedded in its wings, while its engine inlet duct is built like a snake so enemy radar beams have to bounce around multiple times before hitting the engine fan blades.

image: 
The F-35 hides all its fuel and weapons inside its skin of stealth. (Photo: Angel DelCueto/Lockheed Martin)

These multiple stealth features, Mr Over said, are part of what distinguishes fifth-generation fighters from their predecessors.
Back in a meeting room, Mr Over tried to illustrate just how much stealthier the F-35 is. He pulled up an animation showing the size of an enemy’s radar range relative to a jet’s observability.
Compared to the F-35, a fourth-generation fighter lugging around external weapons and fuel tanks has to contend with a radar range at least two times longer.
The F-35's stealthiness is especially useful against the newest air defence systems that can shoot deadly missiles as far as 400km, which Mr Over described as “probably the most serious threats to fighter airplanes”.

image: 
An F-35B is cleared for short take-off at night. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

For the F-35, this wouldn't really be a problem, Mr Over said. Pilots can fly really close and destroy the threat without a single beep on the enemy's radar, rendering them oblivious.
“Pilots that are flying the F-35 have the ability to go any place they want to in the battle space with impunity,” he added. “The first time an adversary knows you’re in his battle space is when something important to him is destroyed.”
SENSORS
On top of the stealth, the F-35 is jam-packed with sensors that enable it to see and identify enemy planes from greater distances than fourth-generation fighters.
This includes the latest Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, which sees farther and uses a receiver beam to passively search for enemies. This helps the jets stay aware yet stealthy.

image: 
Under the F-35's nose is its targeting sensor, which can search and track enemies based on their heat signature. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

Another advanced sensor is the Distributed Aperture System (DAS), comprising six cameras placed around the jet that project a 360-degree view on the inside of pilots’ helmet visors.
During air-to-air combat, pilots can turn their heads and see through the plane, avoiding a sneak attack from the rear. Target on the ground? Pilots only need to look down and engage.
But perhaps the main game changer is the F-35’s ability to combine information from each of its sensors and create a single picture of the battlefield, a challenging job that pilots used to have to do in their heads.
During a complex mission, contested by fleets of enemy planes and battalions of ground targets, pilots must compare information from individual sensors and verify if a target is really there, all while flying and fighting.

image:
F-35 pilots use an advanced helmet that comes with night vision and projects information on the inside of its visor. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

Pilots in the F-35 are not bogged down by this. In one glance, they can see which sensors are identifying the target and how confident the computer is in interpreting it as a friend or foe.
“It’s presenting a very logical, God’s eye perspective of the battle space to the pilot,” Mr Over said, suggesting an awareness that could extend hundreds of kilometres around the jet.
FIGHTING TOGETHER
That’s not all.
If an F-35 is geographically unable to get some information about a target, it can automatically “ask” another better-positioned F-35 to do it. This data is fed back and shared across a network of F-35s, all without the pilot lifting a finger.
This information is also shared across a multi-function advanced datalink (MADL) that is more secure than the system on fourth-generation fighters. MADL can also transmit more information and is harder to jam.
According to Mr Over, it’s so secure that an older fighter flying close to three F-35s talking to each other will not be able to detect any transmitting signals, unless the jets are perfectly aligned.

image: 
A formation of F-35Bs above USS America. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

Moreover, the F-35 can share this data with other air assets via the older datalink system, increasing the situational awareness of an entire force on the battlefront.
This means that a pack of F-35s can arrive unannounced in highlycontested territory and clear the way for other planes to finish the job. “I can see war fighters using the F-35 in ways that I can’t imagine,” Mr Over said.


DOGFIGHTS
As for the more traditional way of using fighter jets, namely to destroy other aircraft during close combat, the F-35 has come in for a fair bit of criticism.
In a 2015 report, a test pilot described how the F-35 had lost to F-16s and F-15s in dogfights, indicating that it was too slow on the turn. Critics of the F-35 programme jumped on it.

image: 
An F-35B testing out its weapons. (Photo: Andy Wolfe/Lockheed Martin)

But two years later, the F-35 showed it can ace the competition, achieving impressive results at the US Air Force’s Exercise Red Flag. Held a few times every year, Red Flag is a realistic and challenging aerial combat training exercise involving multiple assets from different countries.
At the January 2017 edition, which included lethal heavyweights like the F-22, Eurofighter Typhoon and B-2 Stealth Bomber, the F-35 came away with a kill ratio of 20:1, which means that it killed 20 aggressors for each F-35 downed.
“Pilots will tell you the F-35s, in an air-to-air dogfight mode, fly differently than F-16s,” Mr Over said. “If you fly this airplane to its strengths, it will do very well in that close turning visual fight.”

image: 
An F-35C fires off its AIM-9X missile on a test flight. (Photo: Dane Wiedmann/Lockheed Martin)

Still, Mr Over pointed out that there is always a 50-50 chance of getting killed in a dogfight, regardless of the jet.
“So, it’s not because the airplane can’t fight at that range, it’s because it’s stupid to get embroiled in that within visual range fight,” he added.
Instead, the F-35 focuses on delivering beyond visual range weapons due to a lesser emphasis on manoeuvrability in air-to-air combat, Mr Over explained. This is because modern jets don’t need to point their noses at where they want to shoot at.
MAINTENANCE
After all the fighting is done and the F-35 lands with an empty weapons bay, Mr Larry Gatti rests easy.

image: 
Personnel loading weapons into the F-35's internal weapons bay. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

This is because Lockheed Martin's F-35 sustainment campaigns lead, who has decades of experience maintaining jets like the F-15 and F-16, knows that cleaning the weapons bay will be an absolute breeze.
Unlike the fourth-generation fighters, which create a big mess by using explosive cartridges to release their external missiles, the F-35 only uses a small charge of compressed air to push missiles out of its body.
This is “one of Steve's other favourites”, Mr Gatti said with a laugh. “It's clean, reduces maintenance and actually more reliable too.”

image: 
On the F-35, 86 per cent of routine maintenance panels allow technicians to reach them without destroying the jet's top coat. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

Something else that makes the F-35 so easy to maintain is its ready access to routine maintenance panels. Technicians can reach more than three-quarters of these panels without destroying the top coat, a key stealth component of the jet.
On older stealth jets, technicians went through a complicated process that involved carving into the top coat, re-applying it and letting it cure.
This was also labour-intensive and time-consuming, Mr Gatti said, not such a good idea when you want your jets up and flying instead of sitting in a workshop. But on the F-35, everything could be done in fewer than a couple of hours, he added.

image: 
ALIS tracks the health of each part of each F-35 around the world. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

And at the heart of it all is the Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS), the F-35's maintenance software that tells technicians how each jet is configured, its flight telemetry and what exactly needs to be fixed.
It also shares repair and supplies data with F-35 users around the globe and basic engineering data with Lockheed Martin engineers in Fort Worth, allowing the latter to monitor flight performance trends and make global fleet improvements.
“The F-35 was designed from the ground up to be more maintainable,” Mr Gatti said. “One of the things that struck me with all my experience is that it was the easiest airplane I’ve ever taken care of.”

image: 
This F-35 will become Norway's first Joint Strike Fighter. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)

It is no wonder then that more than 10 countries have fully committed to getting a few pieces of these jets. Back at the production facility, digital flags of nations like Israel, Japan and the Netherlands embellish the assembly line.
Each partly or fully assembled F-35 is headlined by a standard display panel, showing the flag of the country that’s buying the jet, the location where it will be delivered and a number that says whether it’s the fifth or 500th F-35 ever built.
It is like a scene from a science fiction movie, when countries band together to create a powerful weapon against an alien enemy.
Just that there are no aliens in this world. Only a formidable weapon in the shape of the F-35.
Click here to read the second part of this series on what it feels like to fly the jet and here for the final part on the programme's challenges and plans for the future.
Channel NewsAsia's visit to the F-35 assembly line was facilitated by Lockheed Martin.




Source: CNA/hz
Tagged Topics
Share this content



Bookmark
More stories for you


Get the Channel NewsAsia newsletter in your inbox
SUBSCRIBE
Advertisement




More information about Channel News Asia
jump to top of page
Sections
About Us
Advertise with us
Get the news that matters in your inbox every morning!
Please enter your email address
I consent to the use of my personal data by Mediacorp and the Mediacorp group of companies (collectively "Mediacorp") to send me marketing and advertising materials in relation to goods and services of Mediacorp and its business partners and for research and analysis
SUBSCRIBE

Follow our news
Experience news with our apps
Copyright© Mediacorp 2018. Mediacorp Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.





image: https://rp.gwallet.com/r1/cm/p46

p46

Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...pore-rsaf-f16-fighter-jet-comparison-10815958
 
Top