• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Experts exposed NEA fudging rainfall data

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_754657.html

Experts say annual rainfall rising, view differs from NEA study

National Environment Agency (NEA) officials, who briefed a panel of drainage experts probing recent floods, were of the view that Singapore's rainfall will show no discernible pattern in the future. But the experts did not quite believe the weatherman.

'It didn't seem physically plausible,' said panel member Lui Pao Chuen, 69, of the NEA's climate vulnerability study, which was first released in 2010 and is meant to project the climate in the future.

So the panel asked to see the rainfall data. And when they pored over the figures, looking at how much rain fell in different parts of Singapore, and which areas experienced the most intense rainfall in an hour, a different picture emerged.

Professor Lui found that there are significant differences in annual rainfall in different parts of Singapore - as much as 50cm between regions. For instance, Changi got 215cm of rainfall a year on average between 1980 and 2009, but the Central Catchment area received 265cm of rain.
 
Top