• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ex-UK minister admits mistake in allowing mass immigratioin

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Jack Straw has admitted that throwing open Britain’s borders to Eastern European migrants was a ‘spectacular mistake’.

The former Home Secretary said Labour’s 2004 decision to hand immediate working rights to Poles and migrants from other new EU states was a ‘well-intentioned policy we messed up’.

His comments emerged on the same day as his successor as Home Secretary, David Blunkett, warned that the influx of Roma migrants into Britain risked causing riots.

Mr Blunkett’s comments reinforced the significance of Mr Straw’s admission about Labour’s failure to anticipate the scale of migration when eight former Soviet bloc nations became EU members, and Britain – almost alone in Europe – allowed the free movement of workers between countries.

At the time, the Government predicted up to 13,000 migrants would come to Britain each year. The actual total over nearly a decade was more than a million.

Virtually every other EU state, apart from Ireland and Sweden, kept their jobs markets closed for the seven years permitted.


In an article for his local paper, the Lancashire Telegraph, Mr Straw – who is MP for Blackburn – admitted the forecasts were ‘worthless’.


And he accepted the ‘social dislocation’ which can be caused when ‘large numbers of people from abroad settle in a particular area’.

Mr Straw said: ‘One spectacular mistake in which I participated (not alone) was in lifting the transitional restrictions on the Eastern European states like Poland and Hungary which joined the EU in mid-2004.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ing-million-East-Europeans.html#ixzz2kUEu3vG3
 
SG should learn from others mistake, UK , France, Australia & US are good example of allowing
Foreign Trash into their cuntry, and what Foreign Trash are good for ?? Protested, riots, fake based
on religion to create havoc in their host country!!

These Trash should be swipe into the garbage and dumped!!
 
There is a big difference. The UK allowed the scum of Europe into their borders. On the other hand, Singapore is attracting the cream of the Indian subcontinent, the most enterprising from Mainland China and the most talented and hardworking from the Philippines.

The arrival of foreigners in Singapore has boosted the economy many fold.
 
....On the other hand, Singapore is attracting the cream of the Indian subcontinent, the most enterprising from Mainland China and the most talented and hardworking from the Philippines.

The arrival of foreigners in Singapore has boosted the economy many fold.

I support your view. Should we petition Pinky to allow 2 million more of such immigrants to become naturalized citizens over the next 3 years? The current population is 5.5 million.
 
its unfare for u to say this

u are not living here


There is a big difference. The UK allowed the scum of Europe into their borders. On the other hand, Singapore is attracting the cream of the Indian subcontinent, the most enterprising from Mainland China and the most talented and hardworking from the Philippines.

The arrival of foreigners in Singapore has boosted the economy many fold.
 
i was in sg last couple of weeks and i noticed that services in both the f&b and retail industries have improved tremendously. my dining and shopping experience in sg had been the best ever in decades. hotel staff were very friendly, courteous and professional. i'm extremely impressed. and i noticed that these wonderful services were staffed by a combination of sinkie and foreign managers and workers all working together in harmony. a job well done sg! :D
 
it's unfair for u to say this

u are not living here

I don't live there but I spend at least 4 months per year in Singapore and I've experienced first hand the advantages of allowing foreign talent into the country. Service levels and efficiency have increased tremendously.
 
Wow, irony from the master.

And if it is not irony, the Samsters can have a good laugh. We have worked with the so-called cream. I have even employed a few. Some of them are good. For the overwhelming majority even spoilt cream would be too good a word. They are sometimes cheaper. There is some benefit in that for the short term. You can improve GDP for a while , but you cannot improve per capita GDP. Any productivity improvements you make by training these people is gone when they leave.

If you are talking about the labourers in construction etc, then yes, these are hardworking people and we need them. They should be better treated.
 
There is a big difference. The UK allowed the scum of Europe into their borders. On the other hand, Singapore is attracting the cream of the Indian subcontinent, the most enterprising from Mainland China and the most talented and hardworking from the Philippines.

The arrival of foreigners in Singapore has boosted the economy many fold.

How many fold? Your words seemed to be backed by roti prata.
 
How many fold? Your words seemed to be backed by roti prata.

The data is available. Do your own search.

In 2000, HK's GDP was double that of Singapore's.

In 2012, after a concerted effort to import talent, Singapore has overtaken HK thanks to the foreigners.
 
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/gvcS-Op3dMg?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

UK OR PUNDEKNADU INDIA?
 
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/oSAdOB8lguE?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

UK OR PUNDEKNADU INDIA?
 
There is a big difference. The UK allowed the scum of Europe into their borders. On the other hand, Singapore is attracting the cream of the Indian subcontinent, the most enterprising from Mainland China and the most talented and hardworking from the Philippines.

The arrival of foreigners in Singapore has boosted the economy many fold.

European law allows citizens of all nations to migrate to any EU country.

SG PAP law says all citizens of the world can populate in Singapore
 
There is a big difference. The UK allowed the scum of Europe into their borders. On the other hand, Singapore is attracting the cream of the Indian subcontinent, the most enterprising from Mainland China and the most talented and hardworking from the Philippines.

The arrival of foreigners in Singapore has boosted the economy many fold.

If you right then it is also true that in return Singapore exported scum like you.
 
There is a big difference. The UK allowed the scum of Europe into their borders. On the other hand, Singapore is attracting the cream of the Indian subcontinent, the most enterprising from Mainland China and the most talented and hardworking from the Philippines.

The arrival of foreigners in Singapore has boosted the economy many fold.

Let me say this before someone says it..wish USA drop atomic bomb into smelly kelingland..aftermath will be even smellier until the ashes subsides and buried.
 
Back
Top