• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ex-ISB Director on Tony Tan

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Dr Tony Tan won the presidential election by a razor-edge 35.20 per cent of the votes narrowly beating Dr Tan Cheng Bok. Morally, though not stated in the Constitution, there should have been a run-off between these two candidate as neither managed to obtain an absolute majority in the first round. It would have frightened the shit out of the PAP leaders as it was obvious that their pet candidate Dr Tony Tan would not have stood an earthly chance against the more popular Dr Tan Cheng Bok in a run-off. So Dr Tony Tan managed to emerge the winner by the slimmest of margin in the first past the post system of the Westminister model. An obsequious supporter had described his victory as an overwhelming mandate which is the acme of ludricrousness.

At best Dr Tony Tan can claim to represent only 35.20 per cent of the electorate as a minority president and could hardly claim to have a mandate in the strict sense of the word.He can be said to be a lame-duck president as if a referendum is taken an overwhelming majority would have repudiated him. The PAP has happily inherited him as he is their pet candidate and so we are stuck with the comical spectacle of a minority president performing the presidential functions of the State. Of course the precarious President Tony Tan could not afford to show any queasiness in performing his official functions as this would have given the game away. Outwardly, he receives the proper respect from foreign dignitaries but whether they harbour any belittling feeling would be an interesting point as they may find it a unique experience interacting with a minority president.

Dr Tony Tan has so far not shown that he has the making of a people's president in the manner of the late President Wee Kim Wee. In fact he seems to be living under the shadow of former President SR Nathan, who was himself not an illustrious president. When asked by reporters what was his achievement in his first year as president, the joker President Tony Tan showed incredible naivety to say comically that watching the Olympic in London was his best achievement so far. Can one imagine paying a president millions of dollars a year from the taxpayers' money to watch Olympic in London and to top it all he claims this to be his best achievement in his first year in office. This is a typical example of the wanton wastage of the taxpayers' money and by a minority president. Former President SR Nathan, who was not a minority president, would have shown more prudence and commen sense than the minority President Tony Tan in matters of propriety..

With all his political experience, it would not be a surprise if President Tony Tan would make further gaffes like his political master Lee Kuan Yew. Even without his gaffes,his chances of re-election as president, if he stands again after his present term expires, would be as dark as a photographer's dark room. He would not stand an earthly chance next time when he faces a more popular candidate like Dr Tan Cheng Bok. He may see the writing on the wall and may quietly fall into oblivion.

- http://singaporerecalcitrant.blogspot.sg/2012/10/a-consummate-joker.html
 
There is fundamental flaws with this article.
First of all, Dr.Tony Tan won by how the electoral rules as stated by the constitution. There is no provision for a run off at all.
Secondly, who is to say that Wee has the making of a president and Tony don't. I'm sure Wee wasn't perfect and neither was Tan Cheng Bock himself. In other words, the same point can be made by the writer on any of the presidential candidates.
For these alone, we can say that the writer is a dummy.
 
Tony Tan is the unpopularly elected President of Singapore. 65 % of Singaporeans voted against Tony Tan
 
had any of the other candidates been president, the percentage would be higher. In other words, Tony is the best candidate
 
GE 2011 - PAP: 60% of the votes
PE 2011 - PAP: 35% of the votes
BE 2012 - PAP: 37% of the votes

The PAP needs to do some true soul searching.
 
LOL. 'People's President'? This guy is an elite and an elitist! The spawn of Tan Chin Tuan! Close relatives with the Lees and the Kwas!

Singapore is nothing more than a little family-run corporate fiefdom. Please get the memo already.

weetheamseng1.jpg
 
And who was this ex-ISD director serving last time? Same group of people right?
 
LOL. 'People's President'? This guy is an elite and an elitist! The spawn of Tan Chin Tuan! Close relatives with the Lees and the Kwas!

Singapore is nothing more than a little family-run corporate fiefdom. Please get the memo already.

weetheamseng1.jpg

Tony Tan was LKY's preferred choice to be 2nd PM.

As Minister of Defence, TT gave his son a 12-yr NS deferment as 3SG and post him to do civilian research during his NS stint after his graduation
 
There is fundamental flaws with this article.
First of all, Dr.Tony Tan won by how the electoral rules as stated by the constitution. There is no provision for a run off at all.
Secondly, who is to say that Wee has the making of a president and Tony don't. I'm sure Wee wasn't perfect and neither was Tan Cheng Bock himself. In other words, the same point can be made by the writer on any of the presidential candidates.
For these alone, we can say that the writer is a dummy.

You are indeed a discerning chap, Kinana! Points for you!
 
<First of all, Dr.Tony Tan won by how the electoral rules as stated by the constitution. There is no provision for a run off at all.>

Who is the bas88rd who started the elected president ? Common sense world standard ,all have run-off 2nd round election to elect a majority president (50.1 %).
Laws are made by MIW.They can suka suka change the laws to create GRCs ? They can suka suka defer CPF withdrawal age to 65 and forced us to set aside required minimum sum ?
To the MIW,they have enacted laws for their corrupt objectives of greed for power and money.
Do we recognise Tancho Tan as the 35% president ? Rather we recognise him as a lame-duck president.
 
batman1;1254555 Rather we recognise him as a lame-duck president.[/QUOTE said:
agree! but TT costs us a lot of money for being a lame duck...
 
Errrrrr, so when will the ground breaking research results be available?
 
Well said. I have added to your points.


Nonsense! In any election, a vote for a particular means a vote against the other. S'poreans by voting for the other PE candidates that gave a combined percentage of 65%, means 65% of S'poreans voted against TT. That's a fact u can't deny.
 
60.1% of fucktards in our midst could not find the balls to vote against pap.
Talking about this lame duck's 35% is a waste of time and makes my blood boil.
Go out and hammer a few of those 60.1%
 
Back
Top