Even well-to-do SGs may not have enough retirement savings

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=2]Even well-to-do SGs may not have enough retirement savings[/h]
dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
PostDateIcon.png
August 15th, 2014 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Editorial

Singapore-crowds-300x200.jpg
According to a DBS survey last month, even the well-to-do Singaporeans may also not have enough savings to see them through retirement.

The survey had revealed that the amount of money an emerging affluent (EA) Singaporean intends to set aside for retirement will in fact, only last him for about 13 years.

This is based on their expected expenditure after they leave the workforce.

The survey showed that 73% of the EAs plan to retire between 55 and 65 years old. Also, on average, they will have a savings of $571,715.

More than 85% said they expect to live on a retirement income of $3,500 per month for the next 15 to 20 years or more.

However, that means their retirement fund will only last them about 13 years, on average. This falls short of the average life expectancy in Singapore. For those born in the 1980s, the average life expectancy is 70 to 75 years, while those born in the 2000s will have a life expectancy of 80 to 84 years.

DBS defines EAs in two categories:

  • Adults aged 18 to 29 with a personal monthly income of more than $2,500
  • Adults aged 30 to 59 with a personal monthly income of more than $5,000
The survey also revealed that while 76% of respondents said providing for retirement is a priority, only 49% have a financial plan in place.

The survey also found that “established” EAs – defined by the bank as those aged 35 to 49, single and working – allocate most of their incomes towards investment and savings. This segment set aside 51 per cent of their income, compared to the “family focused” – aged 25 to 62, married and working or not working – who placed the least at 43 per cent. A significant portion of the latter group’s income goes to loans, DBS said.
Some have chosen to retire outside of Singapore where the cost of living is lower, for example, JB.

Singapore most expensive place to live
expensive_cities.jpg

Last month, according to the Worldwide Cost of Living 2014 report compiled by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), Singapore is ranked the most expensive place to live on the planet.

The report collected data from 131 cities around the world, factoring in the price of food and drink, domestic and personal items, clothing, housing and rent, and bills, among other costs.

leehsienloongpointingfingers_zpsefb36004.jpg


Who did you Stinkees vote for? *hee*hee*
 
<cite class="fn">Robert Teh:</cite>

August
15, 2014 at 8:21 pm
Robert
Teh(Quote)


The pappies overtaxed the citizens with the world’s highest tax to run a
non-welfare state.

They do not care about citizens’ welfare like unemployment or retirement for
they keep saying that there is no free lunch except for their own taking
millions of our taxes as their own free lunches,

Now the pappies are trying to push the whole responsibility of providing
healthcare back to us the people by converting our own retirement CPF to do the
jobs for them when our taxes are lost by billions in overseas projects like
Suzhou, Chongjing, or US subprime crisis.

So when they are telling us how good their medishield life (using our CPF to
pay and withholding our cpf return at 55) is good for us. Have you learned your
lesson? Do you still believe them?
 
9f95.png


The next talking head or 'expert' who claims that inflation is merely caused by consumers of high end luxury goods should be shot in the head.
 
Back
Top