European Council Resolution 2361: No Coerced Vaccination

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
65,819
Points
113

European Council Resolution 2361: No Coerced Vaccination​


March 21, 2021 Publius 6 Comments


The Council of Europe was founded in 1949 after World War II and runs the European Court of Human Rights, which enforces the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source: Free West Media

Council of Europe: No compulsory vaccinations and no discrimination against the unvaccinated​

February 9, 2021
By Free West Media Staff
council-1.jpg

On 27 January, the Council of Europe signed Resolution 2361, which states that vaccinations in EU Member States should not be mandatory. Furthermore, persons who have not been vaccinated may not be discriminated against in any way. This effectively stops the notion of “vaccine passports”.

The resolution goes so far as to order member states such as Sweden to actively inform citizens of these rights. The resolution has been ignored by mainstream politicians and the media.
Many citizens have been worried about whether the untested vaccines will be mandatory, since it has already been proposed in several countries. In Sweden, however, it has not been, because of a law which prohibits involuntary medical interventions. But despite this law, governments could exert such strong pressure on their populations, that it could become almost impossible to live without being exposed to this experimental jab.
In Denmark, a vaccine passport could soon be required to gain access to malls, sports events and other public places, public transport or travel abroad. Happily, the Council of Europe is now putting a firm stop to these plans, since involuntary medical experiments are prohibited by the Nuremberg Convention.
The Council of Europe is an intergovernmental European cooperation organization with 47 Member States, which, despite its name and the same flag, is separate from the EU. Its resolutions are not legally binding, but recommendations to Member States are almost always complied with. For example, as recently as November last year, the government proposed that Sweden’s laws be amended as a result of the Council of Europe’s convention on cybercrime.
The resolution on forced vaccination briefly describes the problems caused by the Covid-19 pandemic with the resulting unemployment, economic downturn and poverty. It also points out that there is a certain distrust among the European population regarding a forced vaccination programme. The resolution contains various recommendations for how to achieve a large vaccine intake, but also something unexpected – namely clear provisions for it.
Point 7.3 of the resolution obliges all Member States to ensure that citizens are informed that Covid vaccinations are NOT (the only word written in capital letters throughout the resolution) mandatory and that no one is politically, socially or otherwise pressured to be vaccinated.
Secondly – at least as important – Member States must ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated because of possible health risks or because the person simply does not want to be vaccinated.
The latter is particularly interesting given the current propaganda of vaccination passports by the system media and several European governments, which they claim is necessary. The Swedish government announced on February 4 that it has decided to introduce a digital vaccine certificate that will be ready by the summer. But what is it then to be used for, if it becomes illegal to discriminate against someone who does not have it?
When the Swedish government summarized the most important things from the Council of Europe’s winter session on its website on 29 January, this was not mentioned – by far the most important in the entire resolution – in a single word. It is not difficult to understand why, given the unprecedented propaganda for mass vaccinations from the Swedish government and not least the system media, which is inflated to levels not previously seen even during wartime.
In Germany, Bavaria’s Prime Minister Söder (CSU) is similarly pushing for compulsory vaccinations for certain professional groups, for example in nursing. And he has even called on the German Ethics Council to help him in this effort. There have in fact been rumours that Söder has been receiving kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies.
According to the Nuremberg Convention, experimental vaccines can be seen as an experiment on the population. In the case of ModeRNA’s and Pfizer’s mRNA jabs, they have never been previously tested.
The Convention consists of ten points and the first stipulates: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely necessary. But the question remains: Is it really voluntary if you are not allowed to work, send the children to school, travel or even visit the mall if you do not submit to the experimental vaccines?
The fifth point states: No experiment should be performed where there is reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur. Countless health and control authorities in several countries stated how they expected this to happen on a fairly large scale. Deaths serious vaccine injuries have already been listed as a result of the vaccinations, including at the US Public Health Agency CDC.
Readers should download the information on their smartphone to have on hand whenever it becomes necessary to remind government officials of the Council of Europe’s guidelines.

Council of Europe Resolution 2361 on vaccines:​

7.3 with respect to ensuring high vaccine uptake:
7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
 

Israelis File Crimes Against Humanity Lawsuit Over Coerced COVID Shots, Citing Nuremberg Code​


March 18, 2021 Publius 16 Comments


[Breaking Urgent Interview with Former Chief Science Officer and VP at Pfizer, on mRNA Injections: “Governments “Lying” Because “They’re going to kill you and your family.”“]
Citing international law won at horrific cost to the world during World War II, Israeli citizens have brought their government to the International Criminal Court at The Hague for Crimes Against Humanity, saying they are being coerced, against the principles of the Nuremberg Code, into taking an inadequately tested, experimental COVID injection by Pfizer.
The plaintiffs say threats of job loss, banishment from public venues, and other punishments are being employed to force the injections upon people against their freely given consent.
LAWSUIT: (Israeli ICC Lawsuit Original Hebrew) (Press Release, Google Translation to English) (ICC Lawsuit Google Translation to English) (OFFICIAL “PEOPLE OF TRUTH” FACEBOOK PAGE, HEBREW AND ENGLISH)
According to the Nuremberg Code “consent” is defined as:
“free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.”

In an interview with the Jerusalem Post – “Could mRNA COVID-19 vaccines be dangerous in the long-term?” – Dr. Tal Brosh, head of the Infectious Disease Unit at Samson Assuta Ashdod Hospital:
“acknowledged there are unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that could lead to autoimmune conditions”
In the same month, NPR reports that Moderna has begun to give its experimental injections to children aged 6 months to 12 years to study “safety” concerns, and Johnson and Johnson has announced safety studies on infants replacing normal years of animal safety trials.
NPR reports in the article “Moderna Gives 1st Vaccine Shots To Young Kids As Part Of COVID-19 Study”:
“Children have now received their first doses of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine, as the company studies the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine for kids ages 6 months to less than 12 years old…. researchers will be watching for any signs that they have difficulty tolerating the vaccine, as well as its effectiveness in protecting them against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.”
Moderna plans to “enroll” over 6,000 children.
In the US, according to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, over 1,600 deaths possibly related to the vaccinations have been recorded, and nearly 20,000 “adverse events,” thousands of them severe enough to require emergency room visits, or to render victims “unable to perform normal daily activities” or “unable to work.”
Although the CDC denies any link between the deaths and the injections, in February it was reported that one third of the deaths reported were within 48 hours of the injection, in many healthy adults reporting no pre-existing conditions.
Anecdotally, footage of reactions is posted online with victims or family members testifying, but are never followed up on by major media reporters (video below.)
(View at Bitchute)

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, a fierce critic of the COVID injections, asks “in how many industries do you know where these products would still be on the market?”
The average time for bringing any new drug or vaccine to general use is 10 years.
Israeli citizens who cannot prove they have received a COVID vaccination, which is now about half the population, are barred from shopping malls, movie theaters, and other public venues, which protesters say makes life “hell on Earth.”
A protester who posted on Youtube said: “When you don’t take the vaccine your life is basically over.” People returning from travel are being fitted out with electronic ankle bracelets, over the 99.8% survival rate disease. Protesters describe a new “medical apartheid” and warn the world to be vigilant of approaching tyranny. (VIDEO BELOW)
(View at Bitchute)

The Ghosts of Nuremberg
The Nuremberg Code was created after Nazi doctors such as Josef Mengele shocked the world, when forced medical experiments on Jewish concentration camp victims were revealed.
The petition states:
“petitioners contacted the respondents on [2/18/21] and warned them that the medical treatment, which is currently being conducted for the entire population of Israel, was done in violation of the rules established for conducting medical experiments on humans, known as the Nuremberg Code.”
The plaintiffs say the regime is forcing injections which have not been subject to normal years-long animal safety trials, are novel technologies, and are still deemed experimental even by the government and Pfizer. The plaintiffs point out that:
“The Israeli Prime Minister has repeatedly stated that Israeli citizens are participating in this innovative medical experiment for the benefit of all the citizens of the world…”
Israel is now issuing a “green card” to prove that a person has received the Pfizer injections.
The complaint states that the system:
“degrades and harms the dignity of the workers…Dedicated workers who until now were an asset to employers in the economy are expelled from workplaces in disgrace for refusing to participate in the medical trial.”
How Severe is COVID?

Israel’s COVID death toll is one of the lowest in the Western world, ranking 55th behind most of the EU countries. The United States is number 12. The survival rate for COVID has turned out to be much the same as the flu, 99.4% to 99.8%.
Although the death toll in the US has frequently been compared to the Spanish Flu, in per capita terms, when differences in population over time are taken into account, the 2020 COVID death toll is much closer to what was seen in the 1957 Asian Flu and 1968 Hong Kong Flu pandemics, which never made the news, much less even remotely stirred discussion of lockdowns or masking. About 8,000 people die in the US every day.
(click for larger image)


In terms of global deaths per capita in the most recent pandemics, COVID has been slightly less deadly than both the 1957 Asian Flu and the 1968 Hong Kong Flu, and even farther behind the Spanish Flu in per capita death toll. Yet in neither 1957 or 1968 was there a whisper anywhere in the world about lockdowns or masks (chart below.)
(click for larger image)

(click for larger image)

Many scientists question the need for any vaccine whatsoever for the present coronavirus. Former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, Dr. Mike Yeadon, says:
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines.”
“You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects,”Nevertheless, the FDA under Joe Biden has announced that trials specifically to determine “safety” for another injection, Moderna’s will begin to be performed on children ages 6 months to 12 years.
Are the Experimental Injections “Safe?”

Historically, animal trials have been conducted for years on various other mammals before injection into a human being.
The College of Physicians of Philadelphia said in 2018:
“Vaccine development is a long, complex process, often lasting 10-15 years and involving a combination of public and private involvement.”


Dr. Paul Offit, who helped invent the rotavirus vaccine, told CNN that timeline [12 to18 months for a COVID vaccine] was “ridiculously optimistic.”
Peter Hotez, the dean of Baylor University’s National School of Tropical Medicine, told National Geographic even an 18-month timeline “would be absolutely unprecedented.”
The experimental vaccines began to be injected into humans in December, just 9 months after the start of the pandemic. FDA “emergency use authorization,” for which the drugs are now approved, was intended for Ebola-like diseases, where victims had an almost certain chance of dying anyway, there were no alternative remedies, and there was little to lose.
Although the FDA has claimed that the present experimental COVID vaccines have been “rigorously tested,” scientists point out that the worst side effects may not become apparent for years, which is why normal animal trials take so long.
Recently a former Gates Foundation vaccine scientist called for halt to the mass COVID injections, a warned of mass deaths caused by the injections in the coming years. Similarly other scientists have warned that in the coming years millions would die from the effects of the injections, which would be blamed on new strains of COVID as used to justify more injections. (See: “The Coming Genocide of Adverse COVID Vax Reactions, and Who to Blame for It“)
Almost like clockwork, Forbes reports in March that COVID cases, not deaths, not overwhelming hospitals despite a year to build out greater capacity, are “spiking” in states with the highest vaccination rates, and Fauci is blaming it on “new variants” which will become a permanent part of life.
Clinical trials for drugs have a high failure rate, 86% failure overall, and 67% for vaccines. For this reason biotech start-up stocks are considered risky in the investment world.
Half of the FDA’s annual budget, or $2.7 billion, comes from the pharmaceuticals industry, in the form of “user fees.” The FDA is well-known for its “revolving door” to Big Pharma, in which FDA officials leave to take lucrative jobs in the industry. In 2019 FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb resigned to go to Pfizer. The Hill reports that “stock options doubled the former commissioner’s income to upwards of $330,000.”
The Hill wrote that during Gottlieb’s tenure he:
“sped up the approval process for experimental and generic drugs, leading many to question whether the “newer and cheaper” drugs hitting the market were actually safe. Those policies directly benefited Big Pharma bottom lines.”
The L.A. Times reported that Gottlieb cut the average approval process by nearly a year.
Coronavirus Vaccines Have Been Problematic
The parties in the Israeli lawsuit say that their government and other organizations are using force, duress, and coercion to force people into unwillingly taking the Pfizer BioNtech injection. Unlike children who can be home-schooled, should their parents decide against the risks of some or all school-mandated vaccines, people in Israel are being fired from their jobs and prevented, or greatly hampered, from life-sustaining activities like conveniently shopping for food.
Despite media and medical establishment proclamations that the mRNA treatments such as Pfizer’s and Moderna’s are safe, thousands of doctors and scientists disagree.
Coronavirus vaccine development has always presented its own set of problems, which have revealed themselves in the long run, after months or years of observing test animals for long-term effects, and after many generations of virus mutation.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder of Children’s Health Defense, writes:
“Scientists first attempted to develop coronavirus vaccinesafter China’s 2002 SARS-CoV outbreak. Teams of US & foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs. Researchers had seen this same “enhanced immune response” during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine testsin the 1960s. Two children died.”
The UK Independent reports:
“A successful vaccine has never been developed for any of the many strains of coronaviruses, due to the nature of the virus itself; and vaccinated people can have a higher chance of serious illness and death when later exposed to another strain of the virus, a phenomenon known as ‘virus interference.’ An earlier SARS vaccine never made it to market because the laboratory animals it was tested on contracted more serious symptoms on re-infection, and most of them died.”


The Israeli lawsuit cites the phenomenon of ADE, “antibody-dependent enhancement,” in coronavirus vaccine development, in which a coronavirus vaccine causes a person’s natural coronavirus response to weaken, not strengthen as normally, over time. There are many coronaviruses in circulation, most often causing the common cold.
The lawsuit states:that it was just recently revealed, contrary to the principle of fully informed consent, that recipients of the Pfizer shot may have to take vaccines every six months, for life, or face more severe illness illness than normal upon exposure.
“The Prime Minister has announced in recent days in the media that due to the problem of lowering the level of antibodies after medical treatment, there is a real possibility that the recipients of the treatment will have to take the treatment every six months [until] the end of their days. This material fact was not revealed by the respondents to the recipients of the medical treatment before receiving it… “
All prior attempts at coronavirus vaccine development have been abandoned, due to responses to vaccines which were initially promising and efficacious, but deadly after the passage of time and many generations of mutated wild virus.
In “Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies” the journal Nature ran science which stated:
“ADE has been observed in SARS, MERS and other human respiratory virus infections including RSV and measles, which suggests a real risk of ADE for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and antibody-based interventions….it will be crucial to evaluate animal and clinical datasets for signs of ADE…”
The lawsuit quotes a senior Israeli virologist who has said:
“In light of all the things expressed here, it is strange that this vaccine has been approved. “
During the Nuremberg Trials after World War II, in which Nazi doctors performed hideous exeriments on unwilling subjects, 24 individuals were prosecuted, and seven organizations. Of the 24 individuals charged, twelve were sentenced to death by hanging. The executions took place in the gymnasium of the court building.
Crimes Against Humanity may be prosecuted “in times of war or peace.”
The Code has provided the basis for all other national laws on medical experimentation.
In US law, Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, relating to the Food and Drug Administration, Subpart B – “Informed Consent of Human Subjects,” stipulates:
“[A drug] investigator shall seek such consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence.”
In the US, pharmaceuticals companies have asked for and received full immunity from lawsuits for any adverse effects caused by the injections.
In December, British health officials of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, warned people with food allergies not to take the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 experimental vaccine injection.
In January the government of Norway issued a warning over the safety of the COVID vaccines for people over 75 who are frail or had other conditions,
In Italy in March, authorities opened a manslaughter investigation after a healthy teacher died hours after receiving the AstraZeneca experimental vaccine.
In Florida, activists have succeeded in having model legislation filed by state legislators prohibiting discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, SB364.
Questioning the Logic of Mass Vaccination
The International Criminal Court petitioners question even the logic of requiring everyone to take any vaccine, since those who choose it are ostensibly “protected” and those who do not accept the risk of the illness, which cannot be passed on to those who are “protected”:
“These drastic measures have nothing to do with public health… the population that is considered at risk of becoming seriously ill or dying from the virus is largely already vaccinated…then there is no danger of death or serious illness among this population…while those who have not been vaccinated are not afraid of getting Corona and / or will get sick easily. These citizens who did not receive the proposed treatment should be left to their own devices and not be restricted by any restriction to live a full and normal life in the State of Israel.”
Unlike other arguably “nanny state” laws such as motorcycle and bicycle helmets for adults, the injections involve very real risks, as Moderna’s frank admission that its trials on children are designed to collect safety data implies.
The lawsuit also criticizes constant COVID testing, which is now known to result in large numbers of false positives. (See: “NBC News: Up to 70% of COVID Tests May be False Positives”)
COVID experimental injections are also being given to the immunocompromised.
Following are further passages from the landmark Israeli citizen lawsuit.
“It should be emphasized that no human vaccines have ever been given in the world with the medical technology of inserting synthetic M-RNA into human body cells, with the envelope made of nano-components called Peg 2000 (known as a carcinogen), with all previous vaccines acting completely differently by introducing killed or attenuated virus And the awakening of the immune system against it.”
“The Nuremberg Code, which is the criminal law in the world with regard to conducting medical experiments on humans, is essentially a code of medical ethics. This code was issued on the basis of laws under which the Nazi criminals, who were convicted of horrific medical experiments, conducted in World War II, were tried in the doctors’ trial known as the Nuremberg Trials. The Nuremberg Code later formed the basis for the enactment of the Helsinki Declaration”
“The first principle of the Nuremberg Code, a principle also set forth in section 13 of the Patient Rights Act and Procedure 14, is the voluntary and informed consent of the person to receive medical treatment and / or participation in the trial. The person is supposed to exercise freedom of choice, without the intervention of a factor that exercises force, deception, fraud, threat, solicitation or other type of restraint and coercion “
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the State of Israel and the Ministry of Health do not present to Israeli citizens the currently available alternatives to corona virus treatments, which have been shown to be effective and with few and not dangerous side effects, and they coax citizens and press them (blatantly violating the informed consent process).
“There are many alternative therapies, such as strengthening the natural immune system with vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, old and proven drugs against viral diseases, such as hydrochloricin, Ramsaur, rinsing the mouth and nasal cavities with salt water or lemon juice, to eliminate the virus before invading the lungs. . Some of these drugs and treatments have even been listed as alternative therapies on the FDA information site…Misleadingly and intentionally, the respondents [defendants] conceal all relevant information from the public about alternative treatments for the virus and push the citizens of Israel solely in the direction of receiving Pfizer’s innovative medical treatment.”
“[There] is a high mortality of 1.5% according to the above data. This requires immediate cessation of the medical trial. “
“The sanctions and exclusion suffered by many citizens, who exercised their legal and natural right not to participate in the medical experiment and were not forced to accept it, were intended to embitter the lives of those citizens, so that they would despair and forcibly take [the injections]”
“The State of Israel degrades and harms the dignity of the workers in the various workplaces in the economy, dedicated workers who do not want to take part in this experiment and refuse to undergo invasive tests every 48 hours.”
“Such a pressure cooker, systematically operated by the State of Israel on its citizens, in order for them to take part in a genetic medical experiment is clearly a crime against humanity.”
“to keep their place of work, in order to enter places of entertainment, culture and leisure. This is coercion that has no place in a reformed and democratic state…”
“Corona regulations even harm the dignity of citizens, who have chosen not to take medical care, as a result of which they are shamefully removed from fitness clubs, swimming pools, restaurants, places of entertainment and culture, hotels. Or they are forced to undergo invasive and painful tests whenever they want to enter the above places.”
“[present government policy] turns Israeli citizens into laboratory rabbits for Pfizer”
 
The battle already lost. Those reluctant to be vaccinated already vaccinated as coerced by those they live with.
 
The battle already lost. Those reluctant to be vaccinated already vaccinated as coerced by those they live with.

I don't think kiasu and kiasi Sinkies need any coercion. :wink:

Throwing in a free face mask and a bottle of hand sanitizer is also very helpful... by the way, I don't think Sinovac jabbers get those freebies, do they? Not part of the National Vaccination Exercise.

I think Malaysians get free gifts from Nestle.

1163397.jpg
 

European Council Resolution 2361: No Coerced Vaccination​


March 21, 2021 Publius 6 Comments


The Council of Europe was founded in 1949 after World War II and runs the European Court of Human Rights, which enforces the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source: Free West Media

Council of Europe: No compulsory vaccinations and no discrimination against the unvaccinated​

February 9, 2021
By Free West Media Staff
council-1.jpg

On 27 January, the Council of Europe signed Resolution 2361, which states that vaccinations in EU Member States should not be mandatory. Furthermore, persons who have not been vaccinated may not be discriminated against in any way. This effectively stops the notion of “vaccine passports”.

The resolution goes so far as to order member states such as Sweden to actively inform citizens of these rights. The resolution has been ignored by mainstream politicians and the media.
Many citizens have been worried about whether the untested vaccines will be mandatory, since it has already been proposed in several countries. In Sweden, however, it has not been, because of a law which prohibits involuntary medical interventions. But despite this law, governments could exert such strong pressure on their populations, that it could become almost impossible to live without being exposed to this experimental jab.
In Denmark, a vaccine passport could soon be required to gain access to malls, sports events and other public places, public transport or travel abroad. Happily, the Council of Europe is now putting a firm stop to these plans, since involuntary medical experiments are prohibited by the Nuremberg Convention.
The Council of Europe is an intergovernmental European cooperation organization with 47 Member States, which, despite its name and the same flag, is separate from the EU. Its resolutions are not legally binding, but recommendations to Member States are almost always complied with. For example, as recently as November last year, the government proposed that Sweden’s laws be amended as a result of the Council of Europe’s convention on cybercrime.
The resolution on forced vaccination briefly describes the problems caused by the Covid-19 pandemic with the resulting unemployment, economic downturn and poverty. It also points out that there is a certain distrust among the European population regarding a forced vaccination programme. The resolution contains various recommendations for how to achieve a large vaccine intake, but also something unexpected – namely clear provisions for it.
Point 7.3 of the resolution obliges all Member States to ensure that citizens are informed that Covid vaccinations are NOT (the only word written in capital letters throughout the resolution) mandatory and that no one is politically, socially or otherwise pressured to be vaccinated.
Secondly – at least as important – Member States must ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated because of possible health risks or because the person simply does not want to be vaccinated.
The latter is particularly interesting given the current propaganda of vaccination passports by the system media and several European governments, which they claim is necessary. The Swedish government announced on February 4 that it has decided to introduce a digital vaccine certificate that will be ready by the summer. But what is it then to be used for, if it becomes illegal to discriminate against someone who does not have it?
When the Swedish government summarized the most important things from the Council of Europe’s winter session on its website on 29 January, this was not mentioned – by far the most important in the entire resolution – in a single word. It is not difficult to understand why, given the unprecedented propaganda for mass vaccinations from the Swedish government and not least the system media, which is inflated to levels not previously seen even during wartime.
In Germany, Bavaria’s Prime Minister Söder (CSU) is similarly pushing for compulsory vaccinations for certain professional groups, for example in nursing. And he has even called on the German Ethics Council to help him in this effort. There have in fact been rumours that Söder has been receiving kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies.
According to the Nuremberg Convention, experimental vaccines can be seen as an experiment on the population. In the case of ModeRNA’s and Pfizer’s mRNA jabs, they have never been previously tested.
The Convention consists of ten points and the first stipulates: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely necessary. But the question remains: Is it really voluntary if you are not allowed to work, send the children to school, travel or even visit the mall if you do not submit to the experimental vaccines?
The fifth point states: No experiment should be performed where there is reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur. Countless health and control authorities in several countries stated how they expected this to happen on a fairly large scale. Deaths serious vaccine injuries have already been listed as a result of the vaccinations, including at the US Public Health Agency CDC.
Readers should download the information on their smartphone to have on hand whenever it becomes necessary to remind government officials of the Council of Europe’s guidelines.

Council of Europe Resolution 2361 on vaccines:​

7.3 with respect to ensuring high vaccine uptake:
7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
Angmoh the best no support coercion just like high class people like me and my family. My mother decided not to take the vaccine and no one coerced her to do so.
 
I don't think kiasu and kiasi Sinkies need any coercion. :wink:

Throwing in a free face mask and a bottle of hand sanitizer is also very helpful... by the way, I don't think Sinovac jabbers get those freebies, do they? Not part of the National Vaccination Exercise.

I think Malaysians get free gifts from Nestle.

1163397.jpg
Ya Gian Peng sinkies that talk loud loud against ceca whatever just give them a little goodies are so proud to gang up with ceca whatever to attack me. For example cantonese prostitute descendant @sweetiepie
 
I think something has developed in the background the governments and pharma industry are not telling us about.
 
Back
Top