PLA openly declared warning to US Navy near China, try to create trouble in my water? Your unaffordable price will hurt real badly. This warning is for whole world to register.
http://www.sohu.com/a/227851089_346466
兵器次元
151文章
0总阅读
查看TA的文章>
7
美国航母靠近中国，专家称：若敢挑事，代价惨烈
2018-04-10 20:49
美军 /中国 /航母
（美国海军华盛顿号航空母舰）
近日，据媒体报道，美军将在亚太聚集60%的军舰和三艘核动力航母，这一阵势着实吓人，但也仅是吓人而已。自冷战末期的海湾战争以来，美国海军的航母战斗群在多场具备战争中大出风头，极好地完成了对敌方航空兵的压制清扫任务，也对地方地面部队构成了致命的威胁。而在这些战列中，美军航母在疯狂“输出伤害”的同时完全没有受到敌军的实质性威胁。
这一“一边倒”的态势让当时的许多军事专家都深感震惊。而军事专家李杰在其近日发布的新书中，介绍了多种打击航母的方法。航空母舰本身并不无敌，此前的几次战例中的辉煌成绩也在很大程度上归功于对手的弱小，如果是针对中国，那么航母“硬上”的代价将会非常惨烈。
（东风26反舰弹道导弹）
首先，针对航空母舰本身，中国已经发展了相当完善而强悍的打击体系。从东风21D和东风26来看，中国已经掌握了完善的中程反舰弹道导弹技术，足够对海岸线外3000公里内的敌方航母编队发起致命打击。而此前“吉林一号”光学遥感卫星已经成功实现过对飞行客机的稳定跟踪，相信在红外、雷达等其它遥感侦查卫星的配合下，保持对亚太地区特定几个航母编队的跟踪应当不成问题。
因为航母编队目标更大，速度更慢，可选择的航线也更少，在战时完全可以为弹道导弹提供初期的目标数据，虽然这一组合不一定能保证在战时重创美军航母，但是已经足够逼迫其在更远的距离上放飞舰载机，极大降低其作战效率，提高其作战成本。
（“吉林1号”拍摄的美军航母基地）
除此之外，航空母舰本身在使用上也并非万能，根据美军的推算，当一座陆基机场拥有和一艘航空母舰一样的飞机配置时，机场航空兵的作战效率实际上明显高于航母。这其实不难理解：机场由于空间充足，可以更加从容方便地完成战机的整备维修工作，在起降时也完全不需要担心弹射器或者阻拦索损坏的问题，分散布置的机堡和停机坪使其更不需要像航母那样担心飞机被一发导弹“一锅端”。
目前中国仅在东部沿海就部署有不下500架第三代战斗机和30座空军基地，而一艘“尼米兹”级航空母舰本身也仅携带约40架F18战斗机和若干电子战机、预警机、直升机，这使得航空母舰在对抗时极难占到便宜。
（中国空军歼11B战斗机）
同时，美军航空母舰本身也需要靠战区的补给基地维持作战能力，除了必须补充的航空燃油、武器弹药和生活用品外，即使是核动力航母也需要每隔几个月清理一次蒸汽管路。而这些固定后勤保障基地也是战时打击的理想目标。一旦前沿的后勤保障基地被摧毁或破坏，航母编队就将难以维持长期攻势，势必向后方收缩或干脆放弃任务。
总而言之，美军的航母编队是大国压制小国的利器，但是在面对中国时，若美国还敢不自量力的“耍大刀”，那么中国必有方法让美国航母不断碰壁，甚至是马失前蹄。
返回搜狐，查看更多
Weapons
151 articles
0 total reading
">View TA's Articles>
7
share to
US aircraft carrier is close to China, experts say: If you dare to pick things, the price is tragic
2018-04-10 20:49
US military
/
China
/
Aircraft carrier
(US Navy aircraft carrier Washington)
Recently, according to media reports, the U.S. military will gather 60% of warships and three nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in Asia Pacific. This is a frightening situation, but it is only scary. Since the Gulf War at the end of the Cold War, the U.S. Navy’s aircraft carrier battle group has taken the limelight in many wars and has completed the task of suppressing and cleaning up enemy air forces. It also poses a deadly threat to local ground forces. In these battle columns, the US aircraft carrier was completely free from substantial threats from the enemy while it was crazy to “export damage”.
This "one-sided" attitude made many military experts at the time deeply shocked. Li Jie, a military expert, introduced a variety of ways to combat aircraft carriers in his new book recently released. The aircraft carrier itself is not invincible. The brilliant achievements in previous battles have also been attributed to the weakness of the opponent to a large extent. If it is for China, the cost of the aircraft carrier's “hard-hanging” will be very tragic.
(Dongfeng 26 anti-ship ballistic missile)
First of all, for the aircraft carrier itself, China has developed a fairly complete and powerful strike system. Judging from Dongfeng 21D and Dongfeng 26, China has already mastered the perfect medium-range anti-ship ballistic missile technology, which is enough to launch a fatal blow to the enemy aircraft carrier formation within 3,000 kilometers of the coastline. The previous "Jilin 1" optical remote sensing satellite has successfully achieved stable tracking of flying passenger aircraft. It is believed that with the cooperation of other remote sensing reconnaissance satellites such as infrared and radar, keeping track of specific aircraft carrier formations in the Asia Pacific region should not be a problem.
Because the aircraft carrier’s formation has a larger target, a slower speed, and fewer routes to choose from, it can provide early target data for ballistic missiles in the wartime, although this combination may not necessarily ensure that the US aircraft carrier is damaged during the war. It is enough to force it to fly carrier-based aircraft farther away, greatly reducing its operational efficiency and increasing its operational costs.
("Jilin 1" shooting of the US aircraft carrier base)
In addition, aircraft carriers are not universal in their use. According to US military projections, when a land-based airport has the same aircraft configuration as an aircraft carrier, the operational efficiency of airport aviation is actually significantly higher than that of aircraft carriers. This is actually not difficult to understand: due to the adequacy of space, the airport can more easily and comfortably complete the fighter's maintenance and repair work, and there is no need to worry about the catapult or the damage of the cable during the take-off and landing. The scattered arrangement of the fort and the apron makes It does not need to worry about the aircraft being "one pot" by a missile, like an aircraft carrier.
At present, China has deployed no fewer than 500 third-generation fighters and 30 air force bases on the eastern coast. A Nimitz-class aircraft carrier itself only carries about 40 F18 fighter jets and some electronic warplanes, early-warning aircraft, and helicopters. This makes it extremely difficult for an aircraft carrier to become cheap when confronted.
(Chinese Air Force 歼11B fighter)
At the same time, the US aircraft carrier itself also needs to rely on the supply base of the theater to maintain its combat capabilities. In addition to aviation fuel, weapons, ammunition and household supplies that must be supplemented, even nuclear-powered aircraft carriers need to clear the steam pipeline every few months. These fixed logistics support bases are also ideal targets for wartime strikes. Once the frontier logistics support base is destroyed or destroyed, the aircraft carrier formation will be unable to maintain a long-term offensive, and it will inevitably shrink back or simply abandon the mission.
All in all, the U.S. military's aircraft carrier formation is a powerful weapon for the suppression of small countries by large countries. However, if the United States dares not to “play big swords” when faced with China, then China must have ways to keep the U.S. aircraft carrier running into a wall, or even lose its footing. Back to Sohu, see more
‘Anti-American’ tag by Trump a new nightmare for US businesses 
