• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

E-cigarettes as effective as patches to stop smoking

streetcry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
923
Points
0
[h=2]Tobacco-free electronic cigarettes are as effective as nicotine patches in weaning smokers off their habit, but both techniques are only modestly successful, a study said on Saturday.[/h]
health.jpg








PARIS: Tobacco-free electronic cigarettes are as effective as nicotine patches in weaning smokers off their habit, but both techniques are only modestly successful, a study said on Saturday.


It is the first trial to compare the increasingly popular "e-cigarette" -- a plastic tube which heats a liquid to an inhalable vapour -- against nicotine patches as an anti-smoking aid.


Researchers in Auckland, New Zealand, recruited 657 smokers who wanted to quit, and assigned them randomly to three groups.


Two groups of around 290 people were given a 13-week supply of either patches or e-cigarettes that delivered nicotine vapour.


Another 73 were given e-cigarettes without nicotine.


Six months later, the volunteers were then questioned, and their breath was analysed for carbon monoxide telltales of smoking, to rate their success in giving up tobacco.


The success rate among the nicotine e-cigarettes was 7.3 percent, compared with 5.8 percent in the patch group and 4.1 percent in the non-nicotine e-cigarette group.


None of the e-cigarette users fell ill from using the product, but the researchers stress that its long-term safety -- an issue that has emerged in the European Union which plans to class e-cigs as medicinal products -- remains unclear.


"E-cigarettes, with or without nicotine, were modestly effective at helping smokers to quit, with similar achievement of abstinence as with nicotine patches, and few adverse events," says the study, published by The Lancet.


But it adds: "Uncertainty exists about the place of e-cigarettes in tobacco control, and more research is urgently needed to clearly establish their overall benefits and harms."


The probe, led by Chris Bullen at the University of Auckland, was presented this weekend at a conference of the European Respiratory Society in Barcelona, Spain, The Lancet said.




- AFP/xq
 
the question is what is not ban in singapore.
if it is not ban, then they might loses the taxes cig bring in. will affect civil servant salary. they care about their salary not the health of smokers.
 
the question is what is not ban in singapore.
if it is not ban, then they might loses the taxes cig bring in. will affect civil servant salary. they care about their salary not the health of smokers.

Yeah that's correct. God forbid the PAP govt help smokers quit smoking by subsidizing nicotine patches. :rolleyes:

Always eager to extract resources, and never any show of generosity in reciprocation. That's the PAP way.
 
Though I agree on the monetary aspect for pappies' ban on this....
E cigs are more harmful than real cigarettes.
Tried it and dun work for me....though was intrigued by the smell-less exhaled 'smoke'.
 
Do you have any substantial research, studies, statistics to back the up? The problem is that ecigs are so new that no studies of any nature has been done on it. Which is what the article is arguing about. The other big problem is there is no standardisation of processes, standards in manufacturing, producing the liquids etc.


Though I agree on the monetary aspect for pappies' ban on this....
E cigs are more harmful than real cigarettes.
Tried it and dun work for me....though was intrigued by the smell-less exhaled 'smoke'.
 
Do you have any substantial research, studies, statistics to back the up? The problem is that ecigs are so new that no studies of any nature has been done on it. Which is what the article is arguing about. The other big problem is there is no standardisation of processes, standards in manufacturing, producing the liquids etc.

Yes I dun have proof.
But this e cig thingy still has nicotine.
To me its the same with people taking sugar free soft drinks or decaf coffee.
Machiam a gambling or drug addict going for softer options instead of quitting totally....half fuck solution at best.
 
I think it is a double standard and mindset of the authorities varies.

If it is a new product that they can make money from, they will say "no problem! No evidence to say it is bad."

If it is a new product that they may make less money, they will say "Cannot! Not proven to be safe."
 
I did not need any of this crap to stop smoking. If your are not ready mentally you are just cheating yourself and will be throwing money out the window.
 
Last edited:
And how much nicotine were you inhaling with your device? What is the absorption rate of it? Which grade of juice were you using? Nicotine has been in use since the bible times. Just because its new doesn't mean it doesn't work. The problem, as stated in the article, is that no long term studies has been done. But, if you compare inhaling 5000 chemicals to something like 20 at best, which do you think is the safer option?

Yes I dun have proof.
But this e cig thingy still has nicotine.
To me its the same with people taking sugar free soft drinks or decaf coffee.
Machiam a gambling or drug addict going for softer options instead of quitting totally....half fuck solution at best.
 
If e-cigs can be effective in helping quit smoking then I'm all for it.. Question is how harmful is it?
Until proper studies are done we won't ever know. Hopefully some governments can step in and do a proper study
 
Back
Top