- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 38,563
- Points
- 113
Don't go the populist way
THIS has been a watershed election and many leaders, including Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, have stressed the need to listen to the people.
One outcome of this may be policy changes on housing and immigration.
Will the Government shy away from tough and unpopular policies to please the electorate even when they can benefit Singapore in the long term?
One reason for the nation making it to where it is today was the hard but pragmatic policies of our founding fathers which required the support and sacrifices of the people.
Our founding fathers were able to carry through the tough policies thanks to their strong leadership and persuasiveness.
The political landscape has changed and the ruling People's Action Party Government needs to engage the people and listen to their needs. Even then, I hope our leaders will not resort to populist measures which are myopic and do not serve the interests of Singapore in the long term.
Charles Tan
WP's decision underlines value of NCMP scheme
THE decision by the Workers' Party to accept Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) seats for Mr Yee Jenn Jong and Mr Gerald Giam - after its leaders' burning opposition to the NCMP scheme before the General Election - underscores the benefits of the system to Singapore's evolving parliamentary process.
The NCMP scheme was never intended to allow its members to vote in Parliament. It was designed to welcome more alternative voices into the legislature as part of the Government's decision-making process.
Now that the elections are over, and the Workers' Party (WP) has opted to accept its two NCMP seats, I sincerely hope it will extinguish its rage against the scheme for good.
Towards a First World Parliament in deed, not just in words.
Toh Cheng Seong
A precious legacy
MR LEE Kuan Yew is a politician extraordinaire. His accomplishments for Singapore when he was the Prime Minister and his total dedication and commitment to the nation's welfare are well documented.
One of his most outstanding feats, which we tend to take for granted, is his success in moulding multiracial, multireligious and multicultural Singapore into one cohesive society. This is a difficult, and in many other countries, an impossible task. In these other countries, there are frequent racial and religious clashes. It is not natural for human beings of different ethnic backgrounds to live together in peace and harmony.
Mr Lee gave a beautiful analogy of the old Singapore when he spoke to a foreign journalist in October 1989.
He said: 'This is not a homogeneous society. Disparate groups of people came to make a living under British rule. They remained themselves in separate distinct compartments. It's like an aquarium, with different glass partitions and different salinity of water. We're trying to form one nation out of them, by removing the glass partitions and gradually equalising the salinity.'
Along with this was the pursuit to make Singaporeans committed to the country and prepared to defend it to the hilt, as well as turn them into confident, courteous, gracious, helpful and generous citizens.
As the late Senior Minister S. Rajaratnam, a member of the Old Guard, put it during Mr Lee's 60th birthday celebration in September 1983: 'Mr Lee Kuan Yew's greatest achievement is not the physical transformation of Singapore but the transformation of the mind and character of the average Singaporean. The docile, self-centred, money-grubbing and rootless colonial slave of a few years ago has, under his leadership and in a few short years, been transformed into an uncringing Singaporean who is today reaching out confidently for a place in the 21st century.'
This is, indeed, a precious legacy for Singaporeans to treasure and safeguard.
What if there had been no Lee Kuan Yew?
I have no party affiliations. I am just a grateful Chinese Singaporean, born in Indonesia and a Christian, living in peace and harmony with my fellow citizens of other races, religions and cultures in this dynamic, progressive, stable and tolerant South-east Asian nation.
Anthony Oei
THIS has been a watershed election and many leaders, including Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, have stressed the need to listen to the people.
One outcome of this may be policy changes on housing and immigration.
Will the Government shy away from tough and unpopular policies to please the electorate even when they can benefit Singapore in the long term?
One reason for the nation making it to where it is today was the hard but pragmatic policies of our founding fathers which required the support and sacrifices of the people.
Our founding fathers were able to carry through the tough policies thanks to their strong leadership and persuasiveness.
The political landscape has changed and the ruling People's Action Party Government needs to engage the people and listen to their needs. Even then, I hope our leaders will not resort to populist measures which are myopic and do not serve the interests of Singapore in the long term.
Charles Tan
WP's decision underlines value of NCMP scheme
THE decision by the Workers' Party to accept Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) seats for Mr Yee Jenn Jong and Mr Gerald Giam - after its leaders' burning opposition to the NCMP scheme before the General Election - underscores the benefits of the system to Singapore's evolving parliamentary process.
The NCMP scheme was never intended to allow its members to vote in Parliament. It was designed to welcome more alternative voices into the legislature as part of the Government's decision-making process.
Now that the elections are over, and the Workers' Party (WP) has opted to accept its two NCMP seats, I sincerely hope it will extinguish its rage against the scheme for good.
Towards a First World Parliament in deed, not just in words.
Toh Cheng Seong
A precious legacy
MR LEE Kuan Yew is a politician extraordinaire. His accomplishments for Singapore when he was the Prime Minister and his total dedication and commitment to the nation's welfare are well documented.
One of his most outstanding feats, which we tend to take for granted, is his success in moulding multiracial, multireligious and multicultural Singapore into one cohesive society. This is a difficult, and in many other countries, an impossible task. In these other countries, there are frequent racial and religious clashes. It is not natural for human beings of different ethnic backgrounds to live together in peace and harmony.
Mr Lee gave a beautiful analogy of the old Singapore when he spoke to a foreign journalist in October 1989.
He said: 'This is not a homogeneous society. Disparate groups of people came to make a living under British rule. They remained themselves in separate distinct compartments. It's like an aquarium, with different glass partitions and different salinity of water. We're trying to form one nation out of them, by removing the glass partitions and gradually equalising the salinity.'
Along with this was the pursuit to make Singaporeans committed to the country and prepared to defend it to the hilt, as well as turn them into confident, courteous, gracious, helpful and generous citizens.
As the late Senior Minister S. Rajaratnam, a member of the Old Guard, put it during Mr Lee's 60th birthday celebration in September 1983: 'Mr Lee Kuan Yew's greatest achievement is not the physical transformation of Singapore but the transformation of the mind and character of the average Singaporean. The docile, self-centred, money-grubbing and rootless colonial slave of a few years ago has, under his leadership and in a few short years, been transformed into an uncringing Singaporean who is today reaching out confidently for a place in the 21st century.'
This is, indeed, a precious legacy for Singaporeans to treasure and safeguard.
What if there had been no Lee Kuan Yew?
I have no party affiliations. I am just a grateful Chinese Singaporean, born in Indonesia and a Christian, living in peace and harmony with my fellow citizens of other races, religions and cultures in this dynamic, progressive, stable and tolerant South-east Asian nation.
Anthony Oei