Ang Moh fools super EAT SHIT STUPID.
Proven here in their dumb idea of REVERSE DECENT ROCKET RECOVERY.
Why it is completely WRONG?
1. Waste HUGE amount of Rocket Fuel to control descending after rocket delivered satellite to space orbit. The return journey could need as much fuel as the trip sending satellite up. The return trip is a slow and painful trip taking many times longer duration than the 1st trip up. To prevent it crashed, it is returning at very slow speed. The launching up trip is much faster. All the way in return trip rocket fuel is needed to FIGHT AGAINST GRAVITY.
2. Reverse travel of Rocket is very INEFFICIENT. The rockets are naturally easy to go upwards. It fucks itself in reverse gear. The heat and exhaust gases rise UPWARD, heating up and burning up the rocket, their recovered rocket is ALWAYS burnt black and filthy like Nigger Color. Rockets to launch satellites easily burns e.g. 50 tons of fuel PER SECOND.
3. The hundred TONS OF FUEL NEEDED during return trip are BURDEN WEIGHT during take-off and up-lift. It REDUCED WHOLE PAYLOAD. It spends EXTRA FUEL to carry the Return Trip's fuel. In reality the foolish Ang Moh are spending extra fuel to carry extra fuel up to space, just to use for later trip in return. That is in HUNDREDS of Tons. The weight in all LOST the EFFICIENCY of Rocket Payload, which otherwise could be lighter, more fuel efficient and launch more payloads to space. CB STUPID ANG MOH!
4. The entire plan, in addition to all the required fuel, actually needs to carry extra safety margin amount of fuel, which in typical cases, ended up unused and had to be dumped after recovery, this is obvious, because they can not afford to design without this safety margin amount of fuel, calculated exactly for the launch plan, due to wind and weather and any other unexpected conditions, you can not afford not to have extra fuel unless you are prepared to abandon the recovery when the return trip suddenly ran out of fuel. The fucking rocket will crash on the way back when it run out of fuel. Lets say this safety margin amount of fuel is 15 tons, it is 15 tons of take-off weight, reducing 15 tons of satellite payload! it required BOTH WAYS fuel consumption for launch up and return trip, just to carry this safety margin fuel, which most of it (during ideal conditions) will be carried back to earth after going up to space. In extreme adversed conditions e.g. unexpected jet steams, strong winds etc, during return trip, this extra fuel might not be sufficient, and then rocket recovery will fail, and the CB Ang Moh juck rocket will fucking crash at empty fuel tank, can not fight gravity any longer, just crashed helplessly like a rock.
5. Besides the fuel, the rocket body is actually not very costly item to worthy recovery. most of it are just empty container for fuel. Recycled rocket engine is not reliable, especially after torturing long duration of (high heat) trip. Ang Moh are fucking broke and can not afford to use rocket engine for one time use. That's why they want to try recovery of it. The only expensive parts worth recovery are just the expensive pumps.
6. It is EXTREMELY STUPID for Ang Moh to purely use REVERSED ROCKET JET to recover itself, in many ways due to reasons related to fuel. There are much more REALISTIC ALTERNATIVES of recovery. E.g. Space Shuttle Program, used parachutes to recover the huge fuel tank and 2 rocket boosters. It is also possible to deploy helium balloon or blimp with propellers to recover rockets. helium is very light and propeller fuel amount is negligible, in fact it is possible to have battery driven propellers without fuel. Chinese technology also recovered and reuse some portions of their rockets recently, using parachutes, the inexpensive parts like emptied fuel tanks are not recovered.
7. Recovered rockets such like stupid Ang Moh's Space X, are unreliable. Because it had been through multiple stressful trips in extreme cold (space) and hot (rocket flame) and gravity (high G) launch and recovery, and vibration and mechanical stress. Metal structure fatigue damages and failure among other sensitive and complicated parts. What it means is en-risking all the sub-sequent trips in the recycled reused rockets, it has much higher chance to fail a launch and crash expensive satellites, delay crucial supplies to space-station, and even fucking kill astronauts.
8. The balancing act of REVERSE ROCKET LANDING is inefficient and dangerous. Most of the Space X failures now are due to this. They had been proven repeatedly that ANG MOH Technology LOST to Chinese and Russian in the aspect of PRECISION CONTROL of Rocket, this is also exactly the same in military missiles and anti-missile aspects. Ang Moh idiots wanna show off their weakness. Russians & Chinese had good laughs, they toasted more Vodka and Mao Tai for each failures of Dumb American Losers. Chiak Sai Ang Moh!
Stupid Hopeless CB Chow Ang Moh! Deserve to fail and die.
http://earthsky.org/space/spacex-deploys-satellite-crashes-rocket-jan-17-2016
SpaceX deploys satellite, crashes rocket
A foggy lift-off – successful deployment of Jason 3 satellite – and spectacular crash at attempted sea landing for SpaceX yesterday. Spectacular video of crash, here.
SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket approaches floating drone ship, seconds before tipping over in a spectacular crash. To see the crash, play the video below. Image via SpaceX.
SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket approaches floating drone ship, seconds before tipping over in a spectacular crash. To see the crash, play the Instagram video below. Image via SpaceX.
The private spaceflight company SpaceX did successfully launch an ocean studies satellite called Jason 3 into orbit yesterday (January 17, 2016). It did not succeed, however, in its long-sought goal of bringing the Falcon 9 launch vehicle back to Earth for an upright sea landing.
The rocket made it back to the floating ocean platform yesterday in the Pacific, and it did land upright. But as you can see from the Instagram video below – posted by SpaceX founder Elon Musk – the rocket then tipped and crashed.
Musk said the cause was a landing leg that did not deploy correctly and later said the root cause might have been:
Proven here in their dumb idea of REVERSE DECENT ROCKET RECOVERY.
Why it is completely WRONG?
1. Waste HUGE amount of Rocket Fuel to control descending after rocket delivered satellite to space orbit. The return journey could need as much fuel as the trip sending satellite up. The return trip is a slow and painful trip taking many times longer duration than the 1st trip up. To prevent it crashed, it is returning at very slow speed. The launching up trip is much faster. All the way in return trip rocket fuel is needed to FIGHT AGAINST GRAVITY.
2. Reverse travel of Rocket is very INEFFICIENT. The rockets are naturally easy to go upwards. It fucks itself in reverse gear. The heat and exhaust gases rise UPWARD, heating up and burning up the rocket, their recovered rocket is ALWAYS burnt black and filthy like Nigger Color. Rockets to launch satellites easily burns e.g. 50 tons of fuel PER SECOND.
3. The hundred TONS OF FUEL NEEDED during return trip are BURDEN WEIGHT during take-off and up-lift. It REDUCED WHOLE PAYLOAD. It spends EXTRA FUEL to carry the Return Trip's fuel. In reality the foolish Ang Moh are spending extra fuel to carry extra fuel up to space, just to use for later trip in return. That is in HUNDREDS of Tons. The weight in all LOST the EFFICIENCY of Rocket Payload, which otherwise could be lighter, more fuel efficient and launch more payloads to space. CB STUPID ANG MOH!
4. The entire plan, in addition to all the required fuel, actually needs to carry extra safety margin amount of fuel, which in typical cases, ended up unused and had to be dumped after recovery, this is obvious, because they can not afford to design without this safety margin amount of fuel, calculated exactly for the launch plan, due to wind and weather and any other unexpected conditions, you can not afford not to have extra fuel unless you are prepared to abandon the recovery when the return trip suddenly ran out of fuel. The fucking rocket will crash on the way back when it run out of fuel. Lets say this safety margin amount of fuel is 15 tons, it is 15 tons of take-off weight, reducing 15 tons of satellite payload! it required BOTH WAYS fuel consumption for launch up and return trip, just to carry this safety margin fuel, which most of it (during ideal conditions) will be carried back to earth after going up to space. In extreme adversed conditions e.g. unexpected jet steams, strong winds etc, during return trip, this extra fuel might not be sufficient, and then rocket recovery will fail, and the CB Ang Moh juck rocket will fucking crash at empty fuel tank, can not fight gravity any longer, just crashed helplessly like a rock.
5. Besides the fuel, the rocket body is actually not very costly item to worthy recovery. most of it are just empty container for fuel. Recycled rocket engine is not reliable, especially after torturing long duration of (high heat) trip. Ang Moh are fucking broke and can not afford to use rocket engine for one time use. That's why they want to try recovery of it. The only expensive parts worth recovery are just the expensive pumps.
6. It is EXTREMELY STUPID for Ang Moh to purely use REVERSED ROCKET JET to recover itself, in many ways due to reasons related to fuel. There are much more REALISTIC ALTERNATIVES of recovery. E.g. Space Shuttle Program, used parachutes to recover the huge fuel tank and 2 rocket boosters. It is also possible to deploy helium balloon or blimp with propellers to recover rockets. helium is very light and propeller fuel amount is negligible, in fact it is possible to have battery driven propellers without fuel. Chinese technology also recovered and reuse some portions of their rockets recently, using parachutes, the inexpensive parts like emptied fuel tanks are not recovered.
7. Recovered rockets such like stupid Ang Moh's Space X, are unreliable. Because it had been through multiple stressful trips in extreme cold (space) and hot (rocket flame) and gravity (high G) launch and recovery, and vibration and mechanical stress. Metal structure fatigue damages and failure among other sensitive and complicated parts. What it means is en-risking all the sub-sequent trips in the recycled reused rockets, it has much higher chance to fail a launch and crash expensive satellites, delay crucial supplies to space-station, and even fucking kill astronauts.
8. The balancing act of REVERSE ROCKET LANDING is inefficient and dangerous. Most of the Space X failures now are due to this. They had been proven repeatedly that ANG MOH Technology LOST to Chinese and Russian in the aspect of PRECISION CONTROL of Rocket, this is also exactly the same in military missiles and anti-missile aspects. Ang Moh idiots wanna show off their weakness. Russians & Chinese had good laughs, they toasted more Vodka and Mao Tai for each failures of Dumb American Losers. Chiak Sai Ang Moh!
Stupid Hopeless CB Chow Ang Moh! Deserve to fail and die.
http://earthsky.org/space/spacex-deploys-satellite-crashes-rocket-jan-17-2016
SpaceX deploys satellite, crashes rocket
A foggy lift-off – successful deployment of Jason 3 satellite – and spectacular crash at attempted sea landing for SpaceX yesterday. Spectacular video of crash, here.
SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket approaches floating drone ship, seconds before tipping over in a spectacular crash. To see the crash, play the video below. Image via SpaceX.
SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket approaches floating drone ship, seconds before tipping over in a spectacular crash. To see the crash, play the Instagram video below. Image via SpaceX.
The private spaceflight company SpaceX did successfully launch an ocean studies satellite called Jason 3 into orbit yesterday (January 17, 2016). It did not succeed, however, in its long-sought goal of bringing the Falcon 9 launch vehicle back to Earth for an upright sea landing.
The rocket made it back to the floating ocean platform yesterday in the Pacific, and it did land upright. But as you can see from the Instagram video below – posted by SpaceX founder Elon Musk – the rocket then tipped and crashed.
Musk said the cause was a landing leg that did not deploy correctly and later said the root cause might have been:
Last edited:
