Chitchat Drunk Moslem Bashes Cougar Girlfriend After Local Hotel Prevents Them From Committing Khalwat Adultery! Guess Race!

End of the day, they wanna drink, let them drink. Maybe go Friday prayers after that to ask for forgiveness . They are answerable to their own God.

Correct. Nobody stopping anyone from drinking. The Quran teaches u such but u go against the teaching. U just have to face the consequence in this world and hereafter.
 
Correct. Nobody stopping anyone from drinking. The Quran teaches u such but u go against the teaching. U just have to face the consequence in this world and hereafter.
What if in the hereafter, there are no consequences but just a reassessment of the life just lived? And a chance to better our souls through lives?

Ok ok, you've said before, you don't believe. :biggrin:
 
I think he damn tulan because he couldn't end the night out with a happy ending after spending all that money. :biggrin:
grab is now applying for company preferential room rates for their staff, last i heard :whistling:
End of the day, they wanna drink, let them drink. Maybe go Friday prayers after that to ask for forgiveness . They are answerable to their own God.
that explains the hoard of m&ds seeking porgibness for their drinking habit every friday, although i suspect that some are there to simply exchange slippers :rolleyes:
 
Correct. Nobody stopping anyone from drinking. The Quran teaches u such but u go against the teaching. U just have to face the consequence in this world and hereafter.
Than why this mudslime kpkb about alcohol?

Malaysian Muslim man who berated beer promoter at hypermart apologises after backlash against his family
Mr Mohamad Edi Mohamad Riyars apologising in a video posted on Kepong MP Lim Lip Eng's Facebook page on Nov 21, 2018.
Mr Mohamad Edi Mohamad Riyars apologising in a video posted on Kepong MP Lim Lip Eng's Facebook page on Nov 21, 2018.PHOTO: SCREENGRAB FROM FACEBOOK/LIMLIPENGOFFICIALPAGE
Published
Nov 21, 2018, 6:02 pm SGT
Email
PETALING JAYA (THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK) - A man who berated a Chinese female beer promoter for handing out beer samples in the alcohol section of a hypermart and filmed the incident has come forward to say that he is not a racist.
"I am not racist because my child studies in a Chinese school. I also have friends who are Chinese," said Mr Mohamad Edi Mohamad Riyars, who is also known as Edi Rejang.
"At that time I was too tired from work and was angry, and I became too emotional since it had to do with alcohol. I sincerely apologise to the woman," he said in a video posted on Kepong MP Lim Lip Eng's Facebook page on Wednesday (Nov 21).
Mr Mohamad Edi said he initially wanted to buy groceries at that hypermarket, adding that he noticed a woman who was offering beer samples to shoppers as he was walking by a crowd of people.
"As it was a narrow section, I saw many people congregating there but that place was a non-halal section and I did not check first. As I was very angry at that time, I took out my phone and decided to take a video of that woman, to question her, show that obscene gesture and walk away," he said.
He added that he did not know why he decided to act in that manner, saying that it happened spontaneously.
"I did not have any intention to be racist. We are 1Malaysia; the Chinese, Indians and the Malays all have their rights. It was my fault as I had walked through that area which was non-halal but I went in and hurled abusive words in that place," he said.
Mr Mohamad Edi also said that he hoped he would be able to meet the woman in person to apologise.
LET IT GO
In a statement by Carlsberg Malaysia, the beer promoter has also decided not to pursue the matter further.
On Monday (Nov 19), a video clip of a shopper berating a beer promoter for giving out beer samples in the alcohol section of a hypermarket went viral on social media.
In the video, the girl had remained calm even though the shopper scolded her and demanded to know if she was promoting the beer to "anyone", including Muslims.
As the promoter was about to defend herself in English, he criticised her and insisted that she speak in Malay because this is "Bumi Melayu".
The man then made an obscene hand gesture and spewed vulgarities at her before walking away.
The promoter could be heard in the video saying: "You are hilarious."
LEAVE FAMILY ALONE
Earlier, Deputy Education Minister Teo Nie Ching urged the public not to victimise Mr Mohamad Edi's child after Malaysians dug out his identity when his video of the scolding went viral.
Ms Teo said the public should also not share pictures or details of the child, such as his or her school.
"School is for all children. We should not allow any student to be discriminated against or bullied," she posted on Facebook on Tuesday. "Let's end hatred and not bring it (into) the school."
Separately, Wanita MCA lodged a police report against the man on Tuesday.
Its chief Heng Seai Kie said Wanita MCA was disappointed racial issues and violence against women were still happening in the New Malaysia era.
"Wanita MCA wants to stress that we will not tolerate any acts of bullying towards women.
"We urge the authorities to act against the man and to carry out an investigation under Section 298A in the Penal Code and Subsection 4(1)(c) of the Sedition Act 1948," said Datuk Heng in a statement on Tuesday.
After the man's video went viral, many have since condemned the shopper's actions and praised the promoter for standing up to him.
His identity and personal details were later shared on social media via WhatsApp, including information on his wife and child.
MALAY PARENTS CONCERNED
Social activist Syed Azmi Alhabshi said while nobody condoned the shopper's behaviour, it was not right for people to leak his personal information or hurl profanities at him and his family.
"And now, it has gone to matters which could harm his child's privacy and protection," he said.
Several Malay parents who send their children to Chinese vernacular schools also expressed concern over how this incident might affect their children, said Mr Syed Azmi.
"They are concerned about the kind of impact it would have on their children," he said.
Mr Syed Azmi said the public should help the shopper be a better person instead of bashing him online.
 
"I am not racist because my child studies in a Chinese school. I also have friends who are Chinese," said Mr Mohamad Edi Mohamad Riyars

Go fuck yourself you Muslim cumstain. :FU:
 
What if in the hereafter, there are no consequences but just a reassessment of the life just lived? And a chance to better our souls through lives?

If you believe in Jesus, then your consequences are paid for by His sacrifice on the Cross.

If you don't believe in Jesus, you will always be doing good deeds out of fear that you will be punished in heaven or hell for your mistakes. Or you would be so puffed with with pride over your self righteousness that you believe you have bought your way into Heaven through your own ability.
 
If you believe in Jesus, then your consequences are paid for by His sacrifice on the Cross.

If you don't believe in Jesus, you will always be doing good deeds out of fear that you will be punished in heaven or hell for your mistakes. Or you would be so puffed with with pride over your self righteousness that you believe you have bought your way into Heaven through your own ability.

I appreciate what you are saying. And I am always grateful for the morals taught to us by religion. In fact, common law today derived from these morals. Without morals, we would be animals devoid of the sense of right and wrong. I like some of the Thou Shalt Nots, the teachings of Jesus on Love, the teachings of Buddha on respect for all life.

But consider this. We've always had great thinkers throughout human history. They could be philosophers, writers, scientists, doctors, financial gurus and so on. And they leave behind profound teachings and insights that have benefited human kind. What if an ancient great thinker or a group of them thought the ancient society needed a code of morals to ensure orderly co-existence? When a society flourishes, there needs to be order. With a code of morals, laws can be created and subsequent punishment meted out to offenders. And what if it wasn't God who zapped these laws onto stone tablets?

And this thing with heaven and hell. Reward and punishment, stick and carrot. Don't they seem suspiciously like a human construct to you? To make people toe the line? Just saying.:biggrin:
 
I appreciate what you are saying. And I am always grateful for the morals taught to us by religion. In fact, common law today derived from these morals. Without morals, we would be animals devoid of the sense of right and wrong. I like some of the Thou Shalt Nots, the teachings of Jesus on Love, the teachings of Buddha on respect for all life.

But consider this. We've always had great thinkers throughout human history. They could be philosophers, writers, scientists, doctors, financial gurus and so on. And they leave behind profound teachings and insights that have benefited human kind. What if an ancient great thinker or a group of them thought the ancient society needed a code of morals to ensure orderly co-existence? When a society flourishes, there needs to be order. With a code of morals, laws can be created and subsequent punishment meted out to offenders. And what if it wasn't God who zapped these laws onto stone tablets?

And this thing with heaven and hell. Reward and punishment, stick and carrot. Don't they seem suspiciously like a human construct to you? To make people toe the line? Just saying.:biggrin:
hanor, and being a god-fearing person and to toe the line, indulging in merit-making everytime i'm in thighland - helps my conscience after i've made merit in protein donations to the puyings there. that's human construct in it's best form, hence it's purgatory for me at least :whistling:
 
hanor, and being a god-fearing person and to toe the line, indulging in merit-making everytime i'm in thighland - helps my conscience after i've made merit in protein donations to the puyings there. that's human construct in it's best form, hence it's purgatory for me at least :whistling:
I like your interpretation and subsequent action!:thumbsup::biggrin: Ha Purgatory! That's a Catholic construct. Earth is Purgatory lah.:sneaky:
 
I like your interpretation and subsequent action!:thumbsup::biggrin: Ha Purgatory! That's a Catholic construct. Earth is Purgatory lah.:sneaky:
agree absolutely ; perhaps purgatory is where we're at, to make merit and prepare for the afterlife.
below earth, only hell - and above us, the heavenly sky :rolleyes:
 
abuse-01-crime-punch---file-photo-data.jpg


Always wondered what the SPH+Medicacorp presstitutes are trying to prove when they use such silly file photos for their articles. :rolleyes:

Low class 'journalism'.
 
伊斯兰教 people are the very hypocrite de , simi pray 5 times , haram this haram that , cannot gamble :FU:
 
I appreciate what you are saying. And I am always grateful for the morals taught to us by religion. In fact, common law today derived from these morals. Without morals, we would be animals devoid of the sense of right and wrong. I like some of the Thou Shalt Nots, the teachings of Jesus on Love, the teachings of Buddha on respect for all life.

But consider this. We've always had great thinkers throughout human history. They could be philosophers, writers, scientists, doctors, financial gurus and so on. And they leave behind profound teachings and insights that have benefited human kind. What if an ancient great thinker or a group of them thought the ancient society needed a code of morals to ensure orderly co-existence? When a society flourishes, there needs to be order. With a code of morals, laws can be created and subsequent punishment meted out to offenders. And what if it wasn't God who zapped these laws onto stone tablets?

And this thing with heaven and hell. Reward and punishment, stick and carrot. Don't they seem suspiciously like a human construct to you? To make people toe the line? Just saying.:biggrin:

Every society, Christian or pagan, need laws. We need laws to teach people not to steal, not to murder, not to vote for oppies, not to start fights.

Reward and punishment for the afterlife based on merit, is just a logical extension of what is taught in this world. Tell people that God is displeased with you because you don't wear hijab or drank a can of beer is adding a spiritual extension of earthly laws.

Telling people that God is displeased with you because you don't wear hijab or ate pork or didn't go to church eventually leads to a system where the believer realizes that God is perpetually displeased with you. Everything you do is not good enough. All the good you do can be erased by your most recent bad deed.

Perhaps the belief that God died for your sins and made you clean once and for all came from a good thinker. But it is a radical thinker because once saved, always saved. You don't have to live in fear under constant emotional or spiritual blackmail, forced to do religious rituals because you fear God's displeasure. Some people say believing in Jesus' idea of salvation gives you a passport to sin and fornicate. But hey, the ones fornicating, gambling, drinking and taking drugs the most are usually those who believe in a system where you need to earn your way into heaven through following rules and religious rituals.

Some say they don't follow priests but their holy book. But their holy book and holy rules record their "holy man" doing all sorts of bad stuff like a common bandit. If you follow his example, you'll either be a bandit like him or be a cheerleader and apologist for bandits just because you share their religion.
 
Every society, Christian or pagan, need laws. We need laws to teach people not to steal, not to murder, not to vote for oppies, not to start fights.

Reward and punishment for the afterlife based on merit, is just a logical extension of what is taught in this world. Tell people that God is displeased with you because you don't wear hijab or drank a can of beer is adding a spiritual extension of earthly laws.

Telling people that God is displeased with you because you don't wear hijab or ate pork or didn't go to church eventually leads to a system where the believer realizes that God is perpetually displeased with you. Everything you do is not good enough. All the good you do can be erased by your most recent bad deed.

Perhaps the belief that God died for your sins and made you clean once and for all came from a good thinker. But it is a radical thinker because once saved, always saved. You don't have to live in fear under constant emotional or spiritual blackmail, forced to do religious rituals because you fear God's displeasure. Some people say believing in Jesus' idea of salvation gives you a passport to sin and fornicate. But hey, the ones fornicating, gambling, drinking and taking drugs the most are usually those who believe in a system where you need to earn your way into heaven through following rules and religious rituals.

Some say they don't follow priests but their holy book. But their holy book and holy rules record their "holy man" doing all sorts of bad stuff like a common bandit. If you follow his example, you'll either be a bandit like him or be a cheerleader and apologist for bandits just because you share their religion.
"We need laws to teach people not to steal, not to murder, not to vote for oppies, not to start fights."
-You just had to slide this one in. You sneaky slime ball.:biggrin:

"Reward and punishment for the afterlife based on merit, is just a logical extension of what is taught in this world."
-That's precisely what I meant. This belief is a human construct.

"Perhaps the belief that God died for your sins and made you clean once and for all came from a good thinker."
-This one came from a not-so-good thinker. Why does a supposedly all powerful, all knowing God need to die for the sins of his creation? OK I know, it was love.:rolleyes:

"Some say they don't follow priests but their holy book. But their holy book and holy rules record their "holy man" doing all sorts of bad stuff like a common bandit."
-Priests, monks, nuns, mullahs, and all who profess to be religious teachers and custodians of faith are, at the end of the day, humans. With needs and urges. To thwart nature is to go against it. Hence, the hypocrisy, the lies, the crimes.
 
-Priests, monks, nuns, mullahs, and all who profess to be religious teachers and custodians of faith are, at the end of the day, humans. With needs and urges. To thwart nature is to go against it. Hence, the hypocrisy, the lies, the crimes.

I agree.

Hence, I judge a religion more by the conduct of its founder and core disciples. A religion is also judged by its fruits.

We need laws to teach people not to steal, not to murder, not to vote for oppies, not to start fights."
-You just had to slide this one in. You sneaky slime ball.:biggrin:

Rebellion is akin to witchcraft. So voting for oppies is a sin.

Look at all the oppie movements at the Arab Spring. None of them turned out well. Life was better off under the incumbent. At least they were secular and far less violent than the religious parties that gained power.
 
I agree.

Hence, I judge a religion more by the conduct of its founder and core disciples. A religion is also judged by its fruits.



Rebellion is akin to witchcraft. So voting for oppies is a sin.

Look at all the oppie movements at the Arab Spring. None of them turned out well. Life was better off under the incumbent. At least they were secular and far less violent than the religious parties that gained power.
Religions are all man-made, same as cults are. A cult becomes a religion when enough people buy into what it teaches, then it becomes mainstream. I reckon the better ones teach love, respect and the sanctity of life. But at the end of the day, they are still created by men to control men and instill morals. No one has a monopoly on the afterlife, hence each conjures up their version of it.

I have a mental picture of you saying voting for oppies is a sin with a serious face! And I find that disturbing!:biggrin:
 
Islam is the only religion that requires enforcement of its faith on its believers....
 
Back
Top