Driving instructor molested poly girl during lesson

[jw5]

Isn't it obvious that the evidence is "Be my scandal?" Which 18 year old can come up with that?

In fact, I don't think anyone below 70 years old can talk like that!

The girl is 18, the guy is 53.
So who said it?

 

[middaydog]

In fact, I don't think anyone below 70 years old can talk like that!

lola, I am already above 70 and still can't talk like that !

will you whisper that to me , please !

 

[middaydog]

The girl is 18, the guy is 53.
So who said it?

When the car was stationary, she said he took her hand off the steering wheel and placed it on his thigh. He then placed his right hand on top of hers, and told her to “be my scandal”. She refused.

 

[Kid278]

I don't understand this case at all. Why is it even gone to trial? this is a case of his word against her word. I don't see anything in the report pointing to any evidence or any witnesses. In other words, there is no prove whatsoever. He has already deny doing it. And yet, the judge can find him guilty and jail him 9 months. Based on what facts? If she asked him for free lessons and he said no, and she complained like this, who would know? Using this example, any female can get into a taxi, accuse the cab driver of saying words that outrage her modesty, and threaten to file complain or get free ride.

I am not saying this guy is innocent, for all I know he might be guilty. I am asking where is the evidence to prove one way or another. We already know singapore courts are kangaroo when in comes to oppo leaders, but in this case, they are stupid too.

Its really sad when all the posters on this thread seem to accept the judgement and don't see what's wrong with this picture.

Have to agree with you, words against words it's a stupid case if evidence is anything to go by. If this case stands it'll not only render guys defenceless but set precedence for girls to cry wolf anytime, anywhere.

 

[silverfox@]

This guy needs a good defence lawyer if he wants to get off the hook. So far his reason for appeal is one of denial.

In cases like this, the judge will normally sympathise with the victim which is the girl. So unless the defence lawyer can find evidence or witnesses or even her neighbours to testify that this girl is promiscous, only then would this guy have a chance of appealing against the sentence.