Dr. Mahathir Mohamad ask Singapore to verify the returns of RM2.03 billion !!!

[extinguisher]

http://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/singa...zaks-clearance-of-graft/ar-BBoO7yD?li=AAaGkVj

Dr. Mahathir Mohamad drags Singapore into his beef with Najib Razak's clearance of graft

Now that Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak has been cleared of graft accusations following the completion of a review by the country's Attorney-General, his most prolific critic Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad has fired new salvos in a blogpost.


Najib has for months fended off accusations that the huge payment made into his personal bank accounts in 2013 was siphoned off from a now-struggling state-owned company that he had launched.

Attorney-General Mohamed Apandi Ali said a review of evidence compiled by the country's anti-graft agency showed that the money was a "personal donation from the Saudi royal family", but gave no further details. Najib was also noted to have returned the RM2.03 billion back to the Saudi Royal family.

Of course, Dr. Mahathir — the former Malaysian Prime Minister — is not too happy. It was he who lead the call out for Najib to resign, accusing him of corruption way before the 1MDB scandal came to light.

Now that the Malaysian prime minister is officially cleared of any wrongdoing, Dr. Mahathir said that he had always expected the outcome. His blogpost alos drags Singapore into his personal campaign against Najib, questioning if Singapore could explain how the money was given back to the Saudis.

"Then (the Attorney-General) goes on to say that the balance of US$620 million or RM2.03 billion has been returned to the Saudis. How and when was this done?" he wrote.

"We are told the balance is frozen by Singapore. Can Singapore explain the unfreezing and the delivery back to the Saudis? Or does Singapore also believe in the free gift story, the letter and the Saudi admission."

Last year, the Singapore police confirmed that they had frozen two bank accounts as part of an investigation into possible money-laundering offences related to troubled Malaysian state investment firm 1MDB.

"Singapore is a financial centre. Can it be so gullible?" Dr. Mahathir challenged.

 

[Narong Wongwan]

Shit is gonna hit the fan

 

[extinguisher]

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/ca...mno-leaders-arent-angry-najib-returned-funds/

PAS asks if Umno leaders aren’t angry Najib returned funds

PETALING JAYA:
PAS deputy president Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man is asking Umno leaders if they are angry that funds meant for the party were returned by their party president Prime Minister Najib Razak.

Commenting on the Attorney-General’s (AG) revelation that most of the RM2.6 billion “donation” made to Najib had been returned, Tuan Ibrahim questioned how many Umno leaders even knew that the money had come and gone.

“Imagine if the balance RM2 billion was discussed with Umno (leaders), do you believe anyone in Umno would have agreed for the money to be returned?” he asked in a statement.

“To all Umno leaders, aren’t you angry that funds meant for the party were returned?”

Tuan Ibrahim said the AG’s clearing of Najib of any wrongdoing by stating the prime minister had actually returned the “donation” and the closing of the case, had earned the condemnation of the people.

“The country today is led by leaders who only think of their own interests and not of the country’s future,” he said, adding these leaders who were Muslims have caused Muslims to feel embarrassed.

“Not one sane Malaysian feels proud of their Prime Minister’s prowess in receiving a RM2.6 billion donation.”

Tuan Ibrahim said the only people who believed the AG, were Barisan Nasional parliamentarians who supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), who in his opinion were undeserving of the people’s votes in the next general election.

On the issue of Lembaga Tabung Haji (LTH), he called for the Auditor-General to make public his report and that the fund be headed by someone who was not a politician.

 

[Leckmichamarsch]

what is this mad dog up to now?
who the fuck he thinks he is???
just go quietly waiting for your 72 old virgins old fool

 

[Rosehisapnaj]

Mahatir can go give Anwar fuck.

 

[virus]

How come they returned but is not reflected in my bank book ?
I want answers also

 

[extinguisher]

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/ca...-does-not-have-absolute-power-says-ramkarpal/

DAP lawmaker says courts have a role to uphold the law if Attorney-General Apandi Ali does not prosecute despite evidence of a crime.

PETALING JAYA:
The courts can compel an Attorney-General (AG) to institute criminal proceedings against any individual, if a judicial review finds there is clear evidence that a crime has been committed.

Speaking to FMT on the issue of whether the decision by AG Apandi Ali to clear Prime Minister Najib Razak of all wrongdoing in the RM2.6 billion “donation” case could be challenged, Ramkarpal Singh,

DAP MP for Bukit Gelugor said the real question was whether Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution conferred unfettered discretion on the Attorney-General to institute criminal proceedings.
“While there has been no precedent of anyone challenging an AG’s decision not to prosecute, this does not mean it cannot be done.
“Article 145(3) does not employ the word ‘absolute’, as such, it cannot be said that the AG has absolute power to not institute criminal proceedings.”

He explained the decision to prosecute would depend on the facts and circumstances of a given case and that if there was clear evidence of an offence being committed and if the AG did not prosecute, then the courts had a supervisory role to ensure that the rule of law was upheld.

This, Ramkarpal said, could be done by a judicial review of the AG’s decision not to prosecute and in his view, the courts may compel the AG to prosecute.

Ramkarpal said that if the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) was of the opinion, from its investigations, that there was sufficient evidence contrary to the AG’s view, then it was the MACC who was obliviously aggrieved by the AG’s decision not to prosecute.
“As such it would be best for the MACC to institute judicial review proceedings against the AG for an order to compel him to prosecute.”

He said Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Azalina Othman’s view that the AG’s decision could not be challenged was too simplistic and that the courts should decide if the AG acted unreasonably in making his decision if it was challenged.

Similarly, Professor Gurdial Singh Nijar, who is Law Faculty Professor at University of Malaya said the AG’s decision was not beyond scrutiny as the power to institute any proceedings for an offence at his discretion, was not absolute.

Gurdial told FMT that court decisions make clear that the discretion to prosecute cannot be exercised for an improper purpose and unreasonably or on the basis of an irrelevant or wrong consideration.
“If it is so exercised then it could be subject to challenge through the courts.”

On Wednesday, Azalina said Apandi’s decision could not be challenged, citing Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution which provided the AG with the power to initiate, conduct and stop any proceeding for any offence except those under the Syariah, Native and Military Courts.

 

[Semaj2357]

How come they returned but is not reflected in my bank book ?
I want answers also

you just keep the change for rainy day or for ah han or roy....if they don't ask, don't tell.
if can eat, don't waste

 

[Papsmearer]

Now that the Malaysian prime minister is officially cleared of any wrongdoing, Dr. Mahathir said that he had always expected the outcome. His blogpost alos drags Singapore into his personal campaign against Najib, questioning if Singapore could explain how the money was given back to the Saudis.

"Then (the Attorney-General) goes on to say that the balance of US$620 million or RM2.03 billion has been returned to the Saudis. How and when was this done?" he wrote.

"We are told the balance is frozen by Singapore. Can Singapore explain the unfreezing and the delivery back to the Saudis? Or does Singapore also believe in the free gift story, the letter and the Saudi admission."

Last year, the Singapore police confirmed that they had frozen two bank accounts as part of an investigation into possible money-laundering offences related to troubled Malaysian state investment firm 1MDB.

"Singapore is a financial centre. Can it be so gullible?" Dr. Mahathir challenged.

Aiyah, mahathir should know how it works lah. najib calls Gay Loong and says, hey, can you release the money frozen by your Police/MAS or not? I give you some nice ang pow for CNY. Gay Loong calls Ravi and says, heh, release the money. Ravi just yes sir, and its done. No one asks how, where or what the money is.

 

[mojito]

Times have changed. Now you have a former premier asking our PM: "where is the money!"

 

[extinguisher]