• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Don't post, don't read, don't open FB, cancel a/c, never touch it again! uninstall FB app!

TemaseX

Alfrescian
Loyal
My phone came with FB, I used apps manager to disable it. kill it for once and for all.

They are the worse exploitation spy betraying EVERYONE's data & info worse than CIA FBI KGB,

https://www.rt.com/usa/421678-snowden-facebook-private-intelligence/

Snowden: Facebook a ‘surveillance company’ that collects and sells user data
Published time: 19 Mar, 2018 10:39 Edited time: 19 Mar, 2018 10:44
Get short URL
5aaf9475fc7e9390608b459f.jpg

© Dado Ruvic / Reuters
  • 1147
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden tweeted Saturday that Facebook is a “surveillance company” that sells its users’ personal details, weighing in on a scandal involving a private firm that harvested data from the social media giant.
“Businesses that make money by collecting and selling detailed records of private lives were once plainly described as ‘surveillance companies,’” wrote the former National Security Agency contractor. “Their rebranding as ‘social media’ is the most successful deception since the Department of War became the Department of Defense.”

Snowden’s sobering observation, which was retweeted more than 30,000 times, comes amid public outcry over the revelation that Cambridge Analytica, a private data analytics firm that worked with President Donald Trump’s election team, had harvested personal information of more than 50 million Facebook users without their knowledge.

Facebook suspended Cambridge Analytica’s access to the platform last week, claiming that the company and two individuals who had helped collect the massive data set had misled the social media giant.

READ MORE: Facebook hit with €1.2mn fine in Spain for privacy violations

"In light of new reports that the data was not destroyed, we are suspending these three parties from Facebook, pending further information," the company said. "We will take whatever steps are required to see that the data in question is deleted once and for all — and take action against all offending parties."

Commenting on a New York Times report about the unprecedented data breach, Snowden said it was Facebook, not Cambridge Analytica, that should be held responsible.

“Facebook makes their money by exploiting and selling intimate details about the private lives of millions, far beyond the scant details you voluntarily post. They are not victims. They are accomplices,” he wrote on Twitter.

Facebook insists that Cambridge Analytica’s harvesting methods did not constitute a formal data breach, because users technically consented – via the website’s labyrinthine privacy settings – to having their data mined.

Cambridge Analytica is owned by hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer, and was formerly run by ex- Trump adviser Steve Bannon. The Trump campaign reportedly paid the company $5 million to help target voters.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
 

TemaseX

Alfrescian
Loyal
See any photo video sent or posted anywhere saying FB. Never touch. Not curious at all.

You touched, they begin gathering data from you to sell.
 

kryonlight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Chink social media are even better. They help the chink emperor keep track of his subjects' social credits for free!
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wow good that Facebook is finally getting some karma for their bad deeds of lax controls allowing spreading of malicious online falsehoods of people like me.
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
I remember writing to Mark Zuckerberg to help find out what was happening and he no hew me. Deserved to be bankrupt from fines for allowing poisonous snakes to roam!

Wow good that Facebook is finally getting some karma for their bad deeds of lax controls allowing spreading of malicious online falsehoods of people like me.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The giant monster is FB's giant database inside their data center, got much more info and intelligence than CIA.
data centers belonging to google (alphabet) which also happens to own youtube, android, google play store, google search, google earth, streetview, etc. are way bigger and more numerous than those of fb. they are dealing with exabytes of info in every cuntry they host. fb is just confined to users who use their apps such as fb and instagram. all android users (vast majority of smartphone users today) are data mined by google. and recently all iphone users are also data mined by goog as google has signed a multi-billion $ deal with apple to use google as primary search engine for all ios platforms and devices.
 

whorejinx

Alfrescian
Loyal
data centers belonging to google (alphabet) which also happens to own youtube, android, google play store, google search, google earth, streetview, etc. are way bigger and more numerous than those of fb. they are dealing with exabytes of info in every cuntry they host. fb is just confined to users who use their apps such as fb and instagram. all android users (vast majority of smartphone users today) are data mined by google. and recently all iphone users are also data mined by goog as google has signed a multi-billion $ deal with apple to use google as primary search engine for all ios platforms and devices.


FB database is most dangerous type. Unlike all else.

It tracks SOCIAL NETWORK.

YouTube Android Google search are not as dangerous.

In FB tracks you by your connection with others. Your opinions. U LIKE of FRIEND. Your circle of related people tracks you and identify you. You are tracked for lifetime. Change password ID change phone, change school change job moved house. Migrated. Even had plastic surgery also still tracked you down.

FB knows who are you families. Schoolmates. Friends. Neighbors. Co Workers. Boss. Subordinates. Your career path. Political party. Who you like at which state if your life. Linked to who at where. You FRIEND or UNFRIEND who.

What you are. Who you slept with. How many sex partner you had or switched.

Who you had VOTED for.

All these and globally. And life long.

CIA can not beat this.
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
FB database is most dangerous type. Unlike all else.

It tracks SOCIAL NETWORK.

YouTube Android Google search are not as dangerous.

In FB tracks you by your connection with others. Your opinions. U LIKE of FRIEND. Your circle of related people tracks you and identify you. You are tracked for lifetime. Change password ID change phone, change school change job moved house. Migrated. Even had plastic surgery also still tracked you down.

FB knows who are you families. Schoolmates. Friends. Neighbors. Co Workers. Boss. Subordinates. Your career path. Political party. Who you like at which state if your life. Linked to who at where. You FRIEND or UNFRIEND who.

What you are. Who you slept with. How many sex partner you had or switched.

Who you had VOTED for.

All these and globally. And life long.

CIA can not beat this.

It’s not the data tracked but the malicious users that spread lies that you are slut mistress whore that are dangerous and Facebook should track down these bastard criminals! They can track who are spreading lies if they want to since they can show the filthy Malaysians and Indians that come and see your account and appeared under people you may know. Mark Zuckerberg is not being socially responsible to allow poisonous snakes to spread lies using Facebook.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
FB database is most dangerous type. Unlike all else.

It tracks SOCIAL NETWORK.

YouTube Android Google search are not as dangerous.

In FB tracks you by your connection with others. Your opinions. U LIKE of FRIEND. Your circle of related people tracks you and identify you. You are tracked for lifetime. Change password ID change phone, change school change job moved house. Migrated. Even had plastic surgery also still tracked you down.

FB knows who are you families. Schoolmates. Friends. Neighbors. Co Workers. Boss. Subordinates. Your career path. Political party. Who you like at which state if your life. Linked to who at where. You FRIEND or UNFRIEND who.

What you are. Who you slept with. How many sex partner you had or switched.

Who you had VOTED for.

All these and globally. And life long.

CIA can not beat this.
aiyah. you don't need a social network app to track your social network activities lah. the moment you search for used undies on google or yahoo, they will flag you as interested in buying them, pinpoint your location, ensure you're human and not a bot, check your browsing history, anticipate your next move, and store your keyboard entries to predict your behavior. all these likes and viral forwarding of your content on fb and instagram do not properly profile you based on your social behavior. what's more true is your spend. follow the money as one says. money determines your spending ability, social economic status, personal preferences, political affiliation, religious bend, hobbies, things you need, household requirements, likes, interests, credit, type of work, location, travel patterns, eateries you hang out at, people you meet, and mates you fuck.
 

TemaseX

Alfrescian
Loyal
See all users are FUCKED!

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/facebook-rocked-by-new-data-breach-scandal-10057224

Facebook rocked by new data breach scandal

image: 

upload_2018-3-20_2-40-57.gif

A 3D-printed Facebook logo is seen in front of a displayed stock graph in this illustration taken November 3, 2016. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
19 Mar 2018 08:10PM (Updated: 20 Mar 2018 01:13AM)
Share this content
Bookmark

WASHINGTON: Facebook shares tumbled on Monday (Mar 19) following revelations that a firm working for Donald Trump's presidential campaign harvested data on 50 million users, as analysts warned the social media giant's business model could be at risk.

Calls for investigations came on both sides of the Atlantic after Facebook responded to the explosive reports of misuse of its data by suspending the account of Cambridge Analytica, a British communications firm hired by Trump's 2016 campaign.

"This is a major breach that must be investigated. It's clear these platforms can't police themselves," Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar said on Twitter.

Expressing "serious concern regarding recent reports that data from millions of Americans was misused in order to influence voters," Klobuchar and Republican Senator John Kennedy called for Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg and other top executives to appear before Congress, along with the CEOs of Google and Twitter.

In Europe, officials voiced similar outrage.

Vera Jourova, European Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, called the revelations "horrifying, if confirmed," and vowed to address her concerns while travelling to the United States this week.


Advertisement
In Britain, parliamentary committee chair Damian Collins said both Cambridge Analytica and Facebook had questions to answer following what appears to be a giant data breach, carried out in an attempt to influence voters' choices at the ballot box.

"We have repeatedly asked Facebook about how companies acquire and hold on to user data from their site, and in particular whether data had been taken from people without their consent," Collins said in a statement.

"Their answers have consistently understated this risk, and have also been misleading to the committee."

'SYSTEMATIC PROBLEMS'

On Wall Street, Facebook shares skidded 7.7 per cent in midday trade amid concerns about pressure for new regulations that could hurt its business model.

Brian Wieser at Pivotal Research said the revelations highlight "systemic problems at Facebook," but that they won't immediately impact Facebook revenues.

Still he said "risks are now enhanced" because of the potential for regulations on how Facebook uses data for advertising and monitoring users.

According to a joint investigation by The New York Times and Britain's Observer, Cambridge Analytica was able to create psychological profiles on 50 million Facebook users through the use of a personality prediction app that was downloaded by 270,000 people, but also scooped up data from friends.

Cambridge Analytica said it was in touch with Facebook while denying any misuse of data.

Facebook on Friday suspended the firm, but pushed back against the claim of a major breach, suggesting misused data was limited to a far smaller group of users.

'HUGE IMPACT'

Jennifer Grygiel, a Syracuse University professor who studies social media, said the disclosures will increase pressure to regulate Facebook and other social media firms.

"Self-regulation is not working," Grygiel said.

"I'm wondering how bad this needs to get before our regulators step in and hold these companies accountable."

Grygiel said the breach stems from "thin" regulations that allowed Facebook and its partners to exploit data without oversight.

"They grew because of this," she said. "This was not a mistake."

Daniel Kreiss, a professor of media and communications at the University of North Carolina, said Facebook failed to live up to its responsibilities in handling targeted political ads as it expanded.

"The fact that Facebook seems to make no distinction between selling sneakers and selling a presidential platform is a deep problem," Kreiss said.

Some analysts suggested the breach posed an existential crisis for Facebook because of how it gathers and uses data on its two billion members.

David Carroll, a media professor at the New School's Parsons School of Design, said Facebook and others will soon be forced to live with new privacy rules such as those set to take effect in the European Union.

"Facebook and Google will have to ask users a lot more permission to track them," Carroll said. "Most people are going to say no, so I think it's going to have a huge impact on these companies."

Carroll has filed a legal action in Britain calling on Cambridge Analytica to disclose what data was gathered and used on him.

"If I can get them to disclose my data or my personality score, it indicates every other American has the right to the same thing," he said.


Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/facebook-rocked-by-new-data-breach-scandal-10057224
 

Wi_dows

Alfrescian
Loyal
aiyah. you don't need a social network app to track your social network activities lah. the moment you search for used undies on google or yahoo, they will flag you as interested in buying them, pinpoint your location, ensure you're human and not a bot, check your browsing history, anticipate your next move, and store your keyboard entries to predict your behavior. all these likes and viral forwarding of your content on fb and instagram do not properly profile you based on your social behavior. what's more true is your spend. follow the money as one says. money determines your spending ability, social economic status, personal preferences, political affiliation, religious bend, hobbies, things you need, household requirements, likes, interests, credit, type of work, location, travel patterns, eateries you hang out at, people you meet, and mates you fuck.


The big diff is Google can not use others to identify and keep tracking you. You changed ID they lost track. You don't login or you flush all your browser cookies every use, they are unable to link the present you to your past. You can search 1 million times from different IP & devices, there is no link between these fragments of data. Social Network is ALWAYS BONDED. Their database see a well CONNECTED sea of information.

FB sells data to anyone from CIA to terrorist.

Human Resource Dept don't need to read a job candidate's CV and know CV are false, if they had FB database.
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/business/dealbook/facebook-cambridge-analytica.html

The Latest Test to Zuckerberg’s Leadership: DealBook Briefing


MARCH 19, 2018

Continue reading the main story Share This Page
  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • More
  • Save
Photo
merlin_131869010_a67bab2f-5fce-4ecc-b528-3a7e84c4cf68-master768.jpg


Credit Stephen Lam/Reuters
Good Monday. Here’s what we’re watching:

• Facebook’s stock slides as lawmakers want answers on the latest controversy.

• The trial for the Justice Department’s lawsuit over AT&T’s deal for Time Warner starts this morning.

• Mark Zuckerberg is on the hot seat following the Cambridge Analytica revelations.

• Congress is racing to complete its spending bill.

• U.S. companies warn President Trump about sweeping tariffs.

Get this in your inbox every morning. Sign up here.

The latest test to Zuckerberg’s leadership.
Is Mark Zuckerberg’s unusually powerful position at Facebook in part to blame for the latest backlash against the company?

The giant social media company is under the spotlight because a political data firm apparently misused information about more than 50 million Facebook users. Facebook is still facing questions about Russia-linked accounts that had significant reach within the United States through the social network. In both cases, Facebook has struggled to show the public that it can get in front of its problems. Information about the Russia-linked accounts came out piecemeal, and Facebook knew as early as 2015 that the political data firm had violated its data policies.

Continue reading the main story

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story
Mr. Zuckerberg at first downplayed concerns about Facebook’s role in the 2016 presidential election (something he later said he regretted). His recent communications contain more high-minded deliberation than hard discussion of the company’s problems and how to deal with them.

These look like the reactions of a leader who thinks he is not going anywhere. Indeed, through his holding of special voting shares, Mr. Zuckerberg has an especially powerful position at Facebook that might shield him from the normal forces of accountability. C.E.O.s without that protection might do more to tackle a big problem because it more directly threatens their job security.

Facebook, of course, has taken steps to address the abuse of its network. It has added hundreds of new employees to help police posts, and it has implemented artificial intelligence technology to spot material that falls afoul of the company’s guidelines. Such initiatives cost money. Mr. Zuckerberg earlier this year said that such initiatives would have a significant impact on Facebook’s profitability. Indeed, there’s a strong argument to make that Mr. Zuckerberg’s protected position will allow the company to press ahead with expensive investments in the face of any shareholder grumbling that may arise.

In the near term, though, it’s hard to envision shareholders applying significant pressure on Facebook to be more responsive to the political and legal risks. They may believe Facebook’s extraordinary profitability – its operating profits are roughly equivalent to 40 percent of its profits – will help the stock ride what they see as a passing storm.

If governments propose restrictions on using members’ data, Facebook’s business model would be tested. The company’s board, in theory, should press Mr. Zuckerberg for details on how he will deal with such shackles. But prominent board members like Marc L. Andreessen and Peter A. Thiel are skeptical of regulation. Facebook might be tempted to fight back.

Lawmakers may hold the line, however, sensing that the public has real concerns about the company. And if Facebook’s responses look tardy and inadequate, the consequences could be harsh, as the fate of Wells Fargo shows. Mr. Zuckerberg, in his uniquely dominant position, is the one person who can make sure this doesn’t happen.

— Peter Eavis

api.asp


Facebook’s woes are dragging down tech stocks.
Facebook’s drubbing has gotten worse as the American trading session has progressed.

After opening the day down more than 4 percent, the selloff steepened driving shares of the social media giant down roughly 8 percent before noon.

The slide wiped about $30 billion off of Facebook’s market value. The stock is now down more than 12 percent from its all-time high hit at the start of February.

“We think this episode is another indication of systemic problems at Facebook,” said Brian Wieser, an analyst at New York-based brokerage Pivotal Research Group.

Facebook’s woes showed signs of spreading, too.

The S.&P. 500 tech sector is the worst performing of the index’s 11 sectors.

Shares of Google-parent Alphabet are down about 4 percent at midday. Amazon.com’s losses are hovering around 2.8 percent and Apple is down nearly 2 percent not long before 12 p.m.

Given the outsized role the tech sector has played in the aging bull market, its declines Monday are dragging down the broader stock indexes.

The Dow Jones industrial average is down more than 400 points, or 1.7 percent, while the S.&P. 500, is off nearly 50 points, or 1.8 percent.

— Matt Phillips

api.asp


Lawmakers want answers on Facebook’s latest controversy
Lawmakers in the U.S. and Britain want Mark Zuckerberg to explain how Cambridge Analytica, the political data firm founded by Steve Bannon and Robert Mercer, harvested private information from over 50 million user profiles.

“It’s clear these platforms can’t police themselves,” tweeted Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democratic member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

What happened: The NYT and The Observer of London reported how Cambridge had collected data from an outside researcher to better target Facebook users. Christopher Wylie, who oversaw Cambridge’s data collection until 2014, told the NYT of his former company, “For them, this is a war, and it’s all fair.”

Facebook argued that the incident wasn’t a data breach and that Cambridge had committed a violation. But former Federal Trade Commission officials told the WaPo that Facebook may have violated a privacy pact reached with the regulator. (The tech giant is reviewing whether one of its employees had been aware of the data leak.)

More on Cambridge Analytica: Alexander Nix, the company’s chief, is facing scrutiny over business dealings with Russian interests. Mr. Wylie said that one Russian company, the oil giant Lukoil, appeared more interested in political message targeting than commercial uses. And Cambridge is reportedly trying to block the airing of a report by Channel 4, a British television channel, in which reporters went undercover at the firm.

Critic’s corner

Jeffrey Goldfarb of Breakingviews writes:

“Facebook has abjectly failed to grasp the magnitude of its problems. It took Zuckerberg almost a year to apologize for his blithe 2016 comment that fake news posted across his website didn’t influence the U.S. election. In the meantime, there are mounting concerns over its online advertising power, handling of privacy matters and how much tax it pays in Europe. Ten years ago, Zuckerberg hired Sheryl Sandberg to help turn his startup into a serious corporation. It may be time for more adult supervision.”

Photo
merlin_135724899_f57627d9-f4a9-4f6c-8350-16fab6ebaf66-master675.jpg


Michael W. Ferro Jr. stepped down as chairman of the newspaper publisher Tronc after a period of intense scrutiny that included newsroom unrest at The Los Angeles Times. Credit David Paul Morris/Bloomberg
Michael Ferro has stepped down as chairman of Tronc.
The newspaper publisher announced Monday that Michael W. Ferro Jr., a Chicago entrepreneur and its biggest shareholder, has stepped down as the company’s chairman. The move came just weeks after Mr. Ferro helped negotiate the sale of Tronc’s crown jewel, The Los Angeles Times.

Justin Dearborn, the company’s chief executive, will replace Mr. Ferro as chairman.

“I am confident that under the leadership of Justin and the rest of the board and management team Tronc will continue to deliver value for investors while executing the plan for digital transformation,” Mr. Ferro said in a statement.

Mr. Ferro will remain an investor in Tronc. But his decision to step down as chairman follows a period of intense public scrutiny.

— Sydney Ember

The LTSE takes a step to make companies think about the long term.
The Long-Term Stock Exchange hoping to popularize long-term thinking as a corporate governance strategy has taken another step toward making its goal a reality.

The start-up disclosed today that it has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to let it apply its listing rules to the IEX, the stock exchange famous for wanting to tamp down on high-frequency trading.

The filing — which will commence the public part of the S.E.C.’s rule-making process on the matter — advances the LTSE’s aim of enshrining what it believes are best practices in running companies into corporate charters.

If the S.E.C approves the rule, it means that companies can go public using the LTSE principles, but also have their stocks trade on traditional exchanges like the N.Y.S.E. and the Nasdaq like any other listing. That means these companies can get the liquidity they need along with the corporate governance structure that they want, according to the LTSE’s founder, Eric Ries.

It also formalizes a tie-up between LTSE and IEX, the exchange best known as the subject of Michael Lewis’s “Flash Boys.”

What the principles include

• Letting so-called “citizens,” or investors who plan on sticking with companies for the long term, eventually accumulate more voting power over the years than “tourists” who plan on sticking around for a shorter time.

• Blocking the use of certain kinds of compensation, including short-term bonuses paid to executives based on metrics like reaching a certain milestone for end-of-year earnings

• Banning short-term guidance

• Having long-term investors register their holdings with the company. “The company will know effectively in real time who their long-term investors are,” Mr. Ries said.

• Reporting requirements that include disclosing earnings per share net of buybacks, to provide a more accurate way of measuring how a company is doing without factoring in financial engineering.

The context

• Mr. Ries has spoken of the need to reward long-term investors. “Most of the listing standards are designed to align managers and long-term shareholders,” he told me. “That frees up management to do what’s right.”

• It comes as companies continue to bemoan short-term thinking in the stock markets that has C.E.O.s focused more on meeting a quarter’s targets than longer-term goals.

• LTSE’s goal is to eventually become a stock exchange on which companies list their shares. But for now, it wants to be allowed to create a special kind of listing for IEX that lets companies go public under its principles.

• LTSE also plans to promote itself as serving companies first and foremost and to make money more from listing fees and tools and services for its companies, rather than from trading offerings and data aimed at investors.

Newsletter Sign Up
Continue reading the main story
The All-New DealBook Newsletter
Our columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin and his Times colleagues help you make sense of major business and policy headlines — and the power-brokers who shape them.


You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services.

The caveat

It’s a long road ahead. Not just for the S.E.C. rule-making process, but also in convincing start-ups to adopt these rules when they go public.

“What we have promised our venture investors is not that this is going to instantly transform the market overnight,” Mr. Ries said.

— Michael de la Merced

Photo
merlin_132819689_68899cec-b8a8-4167-98f5-edb2372a5997-master675.jpg


Credit Win Mcnamee/Getty Images
It’s budget time, and Congress is preparing to spend
Friday is the deadline for lawmakers to pass a budget, and they are considering a plan that would cost more than $1 trillion. Expect the deficit to widen to more than $800 billion, as well as a lot of pet projects.

The proposal will probably garner Democratic support, but opposition could come from: a) fiscal conservatives, and b) President Trump (if it includes funding for a New York tunnel project).

In related news: How the tax bill could make your credit card payments more expensive.

Photo
29TAXREACT2-master675.jpg


Thomas Donohue, chief executive of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Credit Alexandre Meneghini/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
U.S. companies warn the White House on China tariffs
Forty-five trade groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, urged President Trump not to move forward with sweeping tariffs on Chinese goods.

Here’s what Thomas Donohue, the C.E.O. of the chamber, said:

“The livelihood of America’s consumers, businesses, farmers, and ranchers are at risk if the administration proceeds with this plan.”

Elsewhere in trade: Mr. Trump is requesting authority to unilaterally raise tariffs, power that could undermine the World Trade Organization. And Latin American countries are forging closer commercial ties with each other, and with China.

The political flyaround
• President Trump attacked Robert Mueller’s investigation, using the special counsel’s name in his tweets for the first time and drawing rebukes from some Republican lawmakers. Despite one Trump lawyer’s call for an end to the special counsel’s investigation, another says that there is no plan to fire Mr. Mueller.

• The special counsel is looking into the Trump Organization’s finances. What’s the connection to Russia? (NYT)

• Mr. Mueller’s case against Paul Manafort includes evidence from hard-to-crack jurisdictions like Cyprus and St. Vincent and the Grenadines. (WSJ)

• Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired Andrew McCabe, the F.B.I.’s deputy director. Several Democratic lawmakers offered to hire Mr. McCabe to help him qualify for his government pension. Mr. McCabe says he kept memos on Mr. Trump.

• Senior Trump administration officials were asked to sign nondisclosure agreements about their time in the White House that would extend past Mr. Trump’s tenure.

• Kushner Companies filed false paperwork with New York City to improperly remove tenants in Queens. (A.P.)

• Keep track of who has left the Trump administration. (NYT)

Photo
19dc-military2-master675.jpg


President Trump with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia last year. Credit Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
What does the Saudi crown prince want from his U.S. tour?
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will meet with the Trump administration and tour several cities this week. Here are a few things most likely on his agenda:

Shoring up military and political support for its bombing in Yemen, despite American lawmakers’ concerns about the U.S. role.

• Persuading American businesses to invest in Saudi Arabia as part of his Vision 2030 plan. The crown prince will meet with Apple and Google, among other companies. Also of interest: In an interview on “60 Minutes,” he said that women were “absolutely” equal to men.

Elsewhere in the Middle East: How Saudi Arabia is building a homegrown entertainment industry. The head of the broadcast conglomerate MBC touted his company’s expanding ties to the kingdom — after he was freed from detention. And here’s the fascinating tale of Qatari royalty who were kidnapped while on a falconry hunt.

Photo
20db-newsletter-gurley-jumbo.png


Your Spotify must-read
Bill Gurley of Benchmark asked in a tweet storm whether the streaming giant was better off pursuing profitability instead of growth. Mr. Gurley argues no — and points out that the company is now more valuable takeover bait.

Photo
merlin_135565320_6fe20519-c0c3-4b2c-9f12-6a9a13bc3d8c-master675.jpg


Paul Jacobs, Qualcomm’s former chairman Credit Ruben Sprich/Reuters
How realistic is Paul Jacobs’s quest to buy Qualcomm?
The son of the company’s founder wants to take the chip maker private, à la Michael Dell and his eponymous computer empire. But it would be a herculean task. Consider:

• Mr. Jacobs would probably have to pay more than the $117 billion that Broadcom offered.

• He only owns about 1 percent of the company. Mr. Dell owned 14 percent of his.

• He would have to bring in significant equity partners, since there is no way he could finance a takeover with debt alone. But it’s not clear where they might come from (SoftBank has shown little interest so far) and whether any foreign backers could pass a national security review.

Critics’ corner: Shira Ovide of Gadfly writes, “It’s unwise for the company’s former C.E.O. to chase after a dream that can’t possibly come true.” And John Foley of Breakingviews asserts that Qualcomm’s biggest issue is mending fences with Apple.

Elsewhere in deals: Newell Brands revamped its board to settle a fight with Carl Icahn. HNA plans to sell $2.2 billion worth of property across China. CACI has bid $7.2 billion for the tech services contractor CSRA to try to spoil CSRA’s impending sale to General Dynamics.

Photo
15DB-SOFTBANK-master675.jpg


Masayoshi Son, the founder of Softbank. Credit Toru Hanai/Reuters
The tech flyaround
• SoftBank is considering taking ARM Holdings public again, though it’s not clear when. (FT)

• Dropbox has reached a new low for corporate governance, John Plender of the FT writes. (FT)

• Bitcoin is at $8,353 after another wild weekend. And Mastercard says it would be “very happy to look at” digital money issued by central banks. And Twitter will ban many virtual currency ads.

• Ola, the Indian ride-hailing company, is expanding in Australia and challenging Uber there. (NYT)

• Foreign smugglers are trying to ship advanced American military technologies to China, Russia and other adversaries at rates that outpace the Cold War. (NYT)

• FedEx has found that while robots may take your role, they might not take your job. (NYT)

• Apple is designing and producing its own device displays for the first time, unnamed sources said. (Bloomberg)

• Google wants a cut of the purchases made through user searches. (Reuters)

• Pricing ever-more-popular cybersecurity insurance is difficult. (FT)

Photo
18haynes-master675.jpg


The billionaire investor Steven A. Cohen in 2016. Credit Coley Brown for The New York Times
Point72’s president quits amid gender bias accusations
Douglas D. Haynes, who was named as a defendant in a suit that accuses Point72 Asset Management of underpaying women and fostering a hostile work environment, resigned on Friday, the NYT reported. Two sources said the move wasn’t related to the litigation, but it still creates another headache for Steven Cohen’s investment firm as it prepares to become a full-fledged hedge fund.

The misconduct flyaround

• A lawyer for Steve Wynn reported a woman to the F.B.I. after she threatened to go public with allegations of the casino mogul’s misconduct toward her. (WSJ)

• An Alaska Airlines pilot sued the company, alleging she was drugged and raped by another pilot during a layover last year. (NYT)

• James Levine, former music director at the Metropolitan Opera, is suing the company after he was fired following an internal inquiry that said it had found evidence of sexual misconduct. (NYT)

• Few law firms are choosing to include partners in their gender pay gap reporting in Britain, a move that would likely widen the pay gap significantly. (FT)

Revolving door
• Alex Wilmot-Sitwell, the head of Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s European operations, has left amid frustration with Brexit. (FT)

• Ann Gronowski, a professor of pathology at the Washington University School of Medicine, has resigned from Theranos’s board. (FT)

The speed read
• The activist investor Edward Bramson has acquired just over 5 percent of Barclays, increasing pressure on the British bank to turn around its performance. (FT)

• Hillhouse Capital Management is raising a fund that could be the largest ever devoted to the China region, surpassing the $9.3 billion raised by K.K.R. last year. (FT)

• BBL Commodities, one of the biggest energy-focused hedge funds, is looking to raise $1 billion for a new fund that will wager on macroeconomic trends. (WSJ)

• China plans to name Yi Gang, an American-educated economist, to lead its central bank in a move signaling that Beijing will continue an ambitious — and, some say, much needed — financial shake-up to get the country’s debt under control and keep its economy growing. China’s president also handed the reins of the country’s financial system to a close ally, Liu He.

• Blackstone guaranteed Stephen Schwarzman new rewards for his contribution to the firm as a founder when he chooses to retire — and even after his death. (WSJ)

• Christian Bittar, once a star banker for Deutsche Bank, pleaded guilty to conspiring to rig the interest-rate benchmark known as Euribor. (Bloomberg)

• An influential committee of lawmakers in Britain says the country should seek to postpone its exit from the European Union if talks drag on. (NYT)
 

TemaseX

Alfrescian
Loyal
I auto filter all email and mark SPAM to anything that say FB. Whatsapp etc, any msg content related to FB I delete instantly. Anyone kept sending me FB contents or any Social Network invites I BLACKLIST.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The big diff is Google can not use others to identify and keep tracking you. You changed ID they lost track. You don't login or you flush all your browser cookies every use, they are unable to link the present you to your past. You can search 1 million times from different IP & devices, there is no link between these fragments of data. Social Network is ALWAYS BONDED. Their database see a well CONNECTED sea of information.

FB sells data to anyone from CIA to terrorist.

Human Resource Dept don't need to read a job candidate's CV and know CV are false, if they had FB database.
you forgot and ignore android which google owns and operates on mobile platforms. what they cannot glean from desktops that run winshit os they can from chrome os and other google apps that run over winshit. with android, they have your imei, wi-fi address, bluetooth address, iccid, seid, even your device serial number. they even know when you wake up and go to toilet to shit. by carrying your android device where ever you go, they know who you are and which hooker (who carries an android phone) in geylang you're fucking.
 

whorejinx

Alfrescian
Loyal
you forgot and ignore android which google owns and operates on mobile platforms. what they cannot glean from desktops that run winshit os they can from chrome os and other google apps that run over winshit. with android, they have your imei, wi-fi address, bluetooth address, iccid, seid, even your device serial number. they even know when you wake up and go to toilet to shit. by carrying your android device where ever you go, they know who you are and which hooker (who carries an android phone) in geylang you're fucking.


Android if stolen your data will be fragmented and unlinked via yr families; friends; lovers; schoolmates; co-workers; army/military buddies; business partners; etc etc. Fragmented data are not powerful. You changed user a/c ID stop using old ones, the link got fragmented, you dump your handphone or factory reset it, you fragmented it again. If you smart, use browsers instead of youtube app to upload video and flush cookies, you can go to settings & app manager to flush data for each apps. If you were Android developer, your developer suit debugger can browse & wipe each app's data.

FB is extremely dangerous. You get new ID, new phone, you never changed the PHYSICAL SOCIAL NETWORK AROUND YOU, you are still being tracked, because your FRIENDS etc still link back to you. Unless you completely disappear from ALL OF THEM. or else FB database still LINK and TRACKED YOU - no escape!
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Android if stolen your data will be fragmented and unlinked via yr families; friends; lovers; schoolmates; co-workers; army/military buddies; business partners; etc etc. Fragmented data are not powerful. You changed user a/c ID stop using old ones, the link got fragmented, you dump your handphone or factory reset it, you fragmented it again. If you smart, use browsers instead of youtube app to upload video and flush cookies, you can go to settings & app manager to flush data for each apps. If you were Android developer, your developer suit debugger can browse & wipe each app's data.

FB is extremely dangerous. You get new ID, new phone, you never changed the PHYSICAL SOCIAL NETWORK AROUND YOU, you are still being tracked, because your FRIENDS etc still link back to you. Unless you completely disappear from ALL OF THEM. or else FB database still LINK and TRACKED YOU - no escape!
can always register as fake persona in fb and instagram with deceived crowd of followers. best is to avoid fb, google and android. stick to iphone and ios. apple is da best!
 

TemaseX

Alfrescian
Loyal
can always register as fake persona in fb and instagram with deceived crowd of followers. best is to avoid fb, google and android. stick to iphone and ios. apple is da best!


Same lah. Gay phones still track you by Apple ID & many other identifiers. Still got FB app inside.
 
Top