never understood his statement or logic. read his statements"Five officers went. Three from the NPC (Neighbourhood police centres), and two from Division. - ". So 5 cops were sent to arrest the schoolboy suspect from school. he has not answer why need 5 cops. a cop is a cop whether from NPC or Division. If you see 5 big size adult males in school accompanying a student in the principal office, what is your immediate suspicion of it??? any idiot can tell you that 5 big size adults males in a principal office are either gangsters or cops. second is that he claimed the boy admitted he touched a part of the body. Noticed how it was worded. which part it does not says. what does it mean??? Accidentally touching the hair is also touching a part of the body.Accidentally touching the arm or shoulder is also touching a part of the body. tapping the hand is also touching a part of the body.Noticed the statement did NOT said the boy was caught touching a private part of the body. now that statement cast more doubts about what going on. who knows? maybe it just a case of an infatuated boy following the girl into the lift and tapping her on the shoulder or arm to try to get her attention or number and the girl cry wolf??? until the video tape recording is viewed by independent parties we cannot say a molest or crime was committed, hence this begets the question of the police playing subjudice here !!!
as i read the statement I am more befuddled. somehow the statement casts more aspersions on what happened. who knows it may just be a case of the girl being overtly sensitive or cry wolf or maybe the police over reacting. you know how sinkies like to complain about the smallest things and make a mountain of a molehill( the father of the girl or amybe the girl herself) and also the teachers (who excommunicated the poor boy from camp just because of an allegation) and the useless principal who is kiasi and spineless. Just my 2 cts worth. until I see the video, I am not convinced.
