• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as MOT?

Is the Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme a good thing?

  • Excuse me, what is the difference between 'bus lane' and 'main road'?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Is Mr Lui Tuck Yew crazy to bend the law to suit his convenience as MOT?

Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme
Is Mr Lui Tuck Yew crazy to bend the law to suit his convenience as Minister of Transport?
mandatory_give_way.MainPar.65912.Image.gif
[Source: OneMotoring: 'Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme'']
20090617.173828_busbayfinal.jpg
[Source: She claims she's a "victim" of new give-way-to-bus rule]

Rear-Admiral+%28RADM%29+Lui+Tuck+Yew,+Chief+of+Navy.jpg


TDY-+Measures+to+improve+bus+travel+%28Mar2012+%29.JPG

Yes, public transport (buses) is Singapore are slow and sucks "Mrs Teo said bus speeds have gone down from 19.1kmh in 2007 to 17.8kmh, as ridership went up from 2.9 million per day to 3.45 million per day in the same time." ['Bus hubs currently the priority and good progress made: Josephine Teo': (TDY18Jan2012)], and in fact, transport by bicycle for journeys 30km and up might average 25.750kmh. [source: 'road-bike.co.uk']

Rather than the drawing up of more bus lanes, it seems that the MOT is getting lazy and thus enacting some confusing stop gap measures like the ridiculous mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme (GWTBS)- a scheme whose logic if not legality remains both contradictory if not perplexing. It is in fact perhaps oxymoronic that the good Minister now says that the slow speed of buses exiting bus is due to the fast and continuous movement of other vehicular traffic on Singapore roads, since in stationary traffic conditions yellow boxes to provide for 'reserved' space so that exiting buses ALWAYS have right of way. [Dunearn-Newton Rd- bus bay with typical yellow box pict].

Wouldn't the provision of better public transport services cause fewer Singaporeans to demand travel by private car or taxi?- a largely carbon and road use intense mode of private transportation.

Isn't the revolving door [wiki] effect of buses entering bus bays the occasion for buses to exit just the same since a bus awaiting entry to a bus bay effectively blocks off all oncoming traffic by virtue of its size? (that is if Minister Lui is adamant about saving bus-lanes painting costs).

Mr Lui as Rear Admiral used to be Chief of Navy; with a cannon in front and torpedoes beneath, everyone gave way to the Admiral's ship. But road vehicular traffic is not the same, emergency vehicles get stuck in traffic jams just the same- nobody moves. Everyone needs space on the little land designated for road use: bus lanes besides allowing cyclist free passage (cycling is good for exercise (save govt healthcare costs) and good for the environment (low impact on global warming)) also allow emergency public vehicles free passage to conduct to their rightful roles, even during the heaviest traffic periods on all days. Emergency public vehicles stuck in jams remain a stain upon the efficiency that the PAP boasts its credentials by.

The start stop driving by vehicles on the left lane caused by ambiguity as to whether a bus is indeed leaving the bus bay is also another cause for accidents occurring, if not a compromise in time and energy efficiency as drivers operate their brakes with unnecessary intensity. This adds to pollution if not frustration of driving on Singapore roads; foreign talents holding international driving licenses also cannot be expected to understand this paradoxical local law as it is international convention for vehicles along minor roads (bays etc) to give way to vehicles along major roads (e.g. trunk roads): wouldn't an accident due to this legal paradox result in more jams created by unnecessary traffic accidents?

One side issue would be that the Minister is being unnecessary cruel to cyclist and motorcyclist in the enaction of the GWTBS law is that the poor rider/ pillion is then expected to breath in the diesel fumes of the exiting bus: not a pleasant experience nor a safe one- considering that the car driver behind might not be able to break in time, having not considered about the need to stop to give way to the exiting bus and result in the poor rider being crushed in-between- another tragic road fatality.

Mr Lui's salary is one that mirrors the elite of the elite in Singapore [pict]. Surely being elite is not about just making more money? Don't the people of Singapore demand more than just hare brained stop gap measures in managing public transport and road use in hyper-efficient Singapore?

Not everybody can afford a maid [pict link], nor the privilege of private transportation in Singapore [Saw Phiak Hua empress pict].

More buses for public transport, safer journeys for cyclist and and motorcyclist. Good Minister, Thank you and have a nice day.

References:
Dunearn+Road+before+Newton+Circus+%28Singapore%29.JPG
Above: Dunearn-Newton Rd bus bay- yellow box pict.

ST23Mar2007-+Why+pay+must+go+up.JPG


STOMP+27+Mar+2011.jpg
[pict source: Singapore's defense burden - Something no maid can carry]

pc_600x450.jpg
[pict source]

- STOMP 29Aug09: “I gave way to bus -- and got rammed from behind”, [link]
- STOMP 19Aug09: “I am one of many 'victims' unfairly fined $130 under new 'give way to bus' rule”, [link]
[link]

transport_minister_leads_by_example_lui_tuck-thumbnail.jpg
[img source]
 
Last edited:

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as M

Lui Fuck You is not thinking clearly. One of the reasons for slower traveling speed has to do with more cars on roads. The huge influx of foreigners contributed to that. It's not about making way for bus lane.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Re: Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as M

What about allowing cycling on the pavement?
Has that caught on?
Or has it caused more danger to pedestrians since all cyclists think that cycling is allowed on pavements everywhere?
 

Unrepented

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as M

Just implemend "Give way to FT cyclist" scheme. Problem solved. Where is my bonus:confused:

What about allowing cycling on the pavement?
Has that caught on?
Or has it caused more danger to pedestrians since all cyclists think that cycling is allowed on pavements everywhere?
 

streetsmart73

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Re: Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as M

Lui Fuck You is not thinking clearly. One of the reasons for slower traveling speed has to do with more cars on roads. The huge influx of foreigners contributed to that. It's not about making way for bus lane.



hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. do you think such daft sheep ever think straight meh?
3. must wayang to prove that it is working & focusing mah.
4. simple: ask itself, what is the root cause to congestion & delay?
5. any no idiot can answer that fairly accurately!
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as M

Typical of these ex-SAF scholar trash in government.

They only know how to wayang, pull rank, and of course, come up with hare-brained suggestions.

eye-power.jpg
0134b02c.JPG
 
Top