Serious Different social distancing laws for different folks in SG

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
http://theindependent.sg/nas-daily-...distancing-frauds-do-we-have-one-set-of-laws/

What do NAS Daily, the “Sovereign” woman, and people pretending to be social distancing ambassadors have in common? Well, Mr Raj Singh, who regularly uploads videos on issues of the day, used the three circuit-breaker breakers to question whether or not Singapore has a double standard when it comes to the law.

Despite the video being only a little over a minute long, the clip packed some punch, as Mr Singh zeroed in on a controversial matter. He began by talking about how Singapore stresses the importance of each person’s part in the battle against Covid-19.

“We are told that we need to follow (the) rules of the circuit breaker,” he said. “All the MPs and all the ministers have come out and said (that) we need to work together –that we Singaporeans and everyone else must play our part(s).”
Mr Singh then cited three key examples of people who have violated circuit breaker measures, using them to build the foundation for a thought-provoking question. “At the same time, you’ve got people like NAS Daily, who goes outdoors to do video shoots and takes off his mask while doing that video shoot,” he said, referring to the well-known video blogger Nuseir Yassin, a Palestinian-Israeli who is now living in Singapore.

“Then you’ve got people pretending to be social distance ambassadors,” said Mr Singh, “when instead, they (would) be better off going to check the prices of NTUC –whether they are fair … no pun intended.”

He also referred to a more recent case of someone flouting the circuit breaker — the woman who referred to herself as a “Sovereign”, after being caught a second time out in public without a face mask. “And then of course, you’ve got the purple lady — the ‘Sovereign’ lady who has been caught not once, but twice now without a mask, and she doesn’t care — in fact, she said the last time around, she was not fined or even warned.”

Mr Singh then contrasted these three incidents with ones where violators have actually had to pay for their disregard of the rules. “So, what about all those people who were fined for not spacing themselves out, not wearing masks, or fined $300 for sitting down having their dinner or lunch? Should they also go and claim that they are sovereign citizens now?”

Using this contrast, Mr Singh ended his concise video with the question: “Do we have one set of laws?”
The question did not fail to spark a debate among those who commented on his post. Some sided with Mr Singh while others criticised him for making such blatant claims.
 
Okay first thing first I anti NAS okay. But be reasonable lah... that CB sovereign is repeat offender plus people ask her wear she guai lan. Has anyone warned NAS to put on mask and he guai lan? The other idiot who pretend to be social distancing ambassador I no comment. I only guess if opposition go out shake hands now they might be posted big big on new headlines saying they CB break CB law.
 
All animals are equal but some are more equal than others.

Do kids read George Orwell's books in primary school these days?
 
Another sovereign case. :rolleyes:

a group of people standing in a room: Woman confronts man in shopping mall. Image: All Singapore Stuff/Facebook
 
The distancing ambassadors don't have the stature to instil fear and allow themselves to be spoken down to
by non-sovereigns too.
 
Indian sluts must have their cheebyes cut off.
 
This ah new sovereign is a local - from the Chinese vulgarities
 
http://theindependent.sg/nas-daily-...distancing-frauds-do-we-have-one-set-of-laws/

What do NAS Daily, the “Sovereign” woman, and people pretending to be social distancing ambassadors have in common? Well, Mr Raj Singh, who regularly uploads videos on issues of the day, used the three circuit-breaker breakers to question whether or not Singapore has a double standard when it comes to the law.

Despite the video being only a little over a minute long, the clip packed some punch, as Mr Singh zeroed in on a controversial matter. He began by talking about how Singapore stresses the importance of each person’s part in the battle against Covid-19.

“We are told that we need to follow (the) rules of the circuit breaker,” he said. “All the MPs and all the ministers have come out and said (that) we need to work together –that we Singaporeans and everyone else must play our part(s).”
Mr Singh then cited three key examples of people who have violated circuit breaker measures, using them to build the foundation for a thought-provoking question. “At the same time, you’ve got people like NAS Daily, who goes outdoors to do video shoots and takes off his mask while doing that video shoot,” he said, referring to the well-known video blogger Nuseir Yassin, a Palestinian-Israeli who is now living in Singapore.

“Then you’ve got people pretending to be social distance ambassadors,” said Mr Singh, “when instead, they (would) be better off going to check the prices of NTUC –whether they are fair … no pun intended.”

He also referred to a more recent case of someone flouting the circuit breaker — the woman who referred to herself as a “Sovereign”, after being caught a second time out in public without a face mask. “And then of course, you’ve got the purple lady — the ‘Sovereign’ lady who has been caught not once, but twice now without a mask, and she doesn’t care — in fact, she said the last time around, she was not fined or even warned.”

Mr Singh then contrasted these three incidents with ones where violators have actually had to pay for their disregard of the rules. “So, what about all those people who were fined for not spacing themselves out, not wearing masks, or fined $300 for sitting down having their dinner or lunch? Should they also go and claim that they are sovereign citizens now?”

Using this contrast, Mr Singh ended his concise video with the question: “Do we have one set of laws?”
The question did not fail to spark a debate among those who commented on his post. Some sided with Mr Singh while others criticised him for making such blatant claims.
Such a slowpoke. That question has been answered here, years ago, by me. :cool:
 
Btw, how is that Sovereign woman now?
waiting for the heat to die down? No one bother after 2 weeks.
 
Last know address was IMH. Soon to be joined by another sovereign (coincidentally another
Indian) from Sun Plaza.
 
Back
Top