Did "Sam Leong"change hands?

Just post lah......analyse so much also no point. This forum does not mirror the sentiments of the real world.

If it does, I'll be worried.
 
Did you realise? He changed from one who is very pro-PAP to one who is anti-PAP how.

Either he has Multiple Personality Disorder (Dissociative Identity Disorder) or the forum owner sold this forum to another fellow, who is anti-PAP now?

Or maybe simply he has seen "Light"??


:confused::confused:

You are not very bright at detecting satire online, are you? ;)
 
Just post lah......analyse so much also no point. This forum does not mirror the sentiments of the real world.

If it does, I'll be worried.

Actually it does. This forum survives because it's a place where people can say things they dare not post on their facebook pages.

Facebook, blogs and wordpress have killed many on line forums. Only those that serve niche markets that facebook cannot serve are surviving.
 

Sure Mr PAP IB. Someone call you that in another thread.

Yeah I know, but I ain't a PAP IB. In fact, I hate the PAP with a passion... so does my family and quite a number of my relatives.

He lost me at 'Teochew supervisor'... no idea what that meant.

My stance on religion is simple: religion is the greatest impediment to spirituality. It is the same for any religion.
 
Actually it does. This forum survives because it's a place where people can say things they dare not post on their facebook pages.

If it really is the case, then you'll not be having thousands of guests and only a handful of 10 to 20 active posters here.

What really is the case is what you've been saying all along. This forum is just a showcase for loonies, me included.

Our postings should never be considered representative of real society.

Also, you'll know by now that out of the handful of active posters, majority of them are from MediaCOCK and SPH. You know who they're.

I do not need to paint the picture for you to see. It's written all over the forum. :D
 
Yeah I know, but I ain't a PAP IB. In fact, I hate the PAP with a passion... so does my family and quite a number of my relatives.

He lost me at 'Teochew supervisor'... no idea what that meant.

My stance on religion is simple: religion is the greatest impediment to spirituality. It is the same for any religion.

Then you should go for Theravada Buddhism, which is actually a Atheistic (no god) Religion
 
Our postings should never be considered representative of real society.

They represent the built in biases, prejudices and evil thoughts of real society. What you see in the real world is the facade. What you read here is what people can't say openly.
 
hi there


1. don't need to worry about Sammy too much.
2. Sammy does at times swing bi-ways.
3. oops! all ways too:D:D:D

hi there

1. streetsmart I wish you well.
2. did I detect the word
3. "bi" there for boss?
 
Yeah I know, but I ain't a PAP IB. In fact, I hate the PAP with a passion... so does my family and quite a number of my relatives.

He lost me at 'Teochew supervisor'... no idea what that meant.

My stance on religion is simple: religion is the greatest impediment to spirituality. It is the same for any religion.

Ya and I also like your stance in marriage. Cheers.
 
I'm neutral as a forum host should be. All I'm doing assuming the role of defender of government policies as there is currently a dearth of pro PAP members here.

There is no point having a forum full of anti PAP members all dancing to the same beat. It would be deadly boring.

If the forum swings to a predominantly pro PAP stance, I'll take the side of the opposition to balance things out.


So during the time of the swing will you be writing to one of my posting that
"Well said. I will add to your points"
 
Then you should go for Theravada Buddhism, which is actually a Atheistic (no god) Religion

Even Buddhism locks you into certain rituals and habits. I want substance, not form.

Also, I am not really atheistic.
 
Even Buddhism locks you into certain rituals and habits. I want substance, not form.

Also, I am not really atheistic.

That is why I say Theravada Buddhism and not Mahayana Buddhism.
 
That is why I say Theravada Buddhism and not Mahayana Buddhism.

You'll still be labeled a Buddhist. I don't want to be labeled as a Buddhist.

If there's a form which requires me to specify which religion I adhere to, the best answer for me is 'Not Sure'.
 
You'll still be labeled a Buddhist. I don't want to be labeled as a Buddhist.

If there's a form which requires me to specify which religion I adhere to, the best answer for me is 'Not Sure'.

You can call yourself free thinker, non believer, infidel whatsoever.. It does not matter in Buddhism. Just believe in the Law of Karma (a natural Law) and do good. That itself is the basic and the most important thing in Buddhism.

It is about action and deed, and not how we call ourselves.
 
Last edited:
They represent the built in biases, prejudices and evil thoughts of real society. What you see in the real world is the facade. What you read here is what people can't say openly.

Which is what I've been saying all along. This forum does not mirror real society.

Give you a simple example which you will easily follow. You see a pretty girl. You imagine fucking her and she moaning in ecstasy.
You can write all your fantasies here. But in real society, this never will happen.

Even in this forum, right now, right this moment, I feel like fucking you, but since you're the forum host, I keep this thought to myself for you will can retaliate, even if I buy immunity, it is still controlled by you. I learnt this lesson when my defensive army was built upon your encouragement but the next moment, you changed your tune and moved the goal-posts.

I will never be taken in by your sweet talk again. Fuck you Leongsam.
 
Back
Top