Depends on who you believe. A 1999 biography by Liza Sahid lists Adnan's military career in some detail, from soldier to sergeant, and commissioning as second lieutenant sometime in the late 30s.
However if you search Singapore's WW2 history in Chinese, several sources like Chinese language Wiki and Baike, China's own internet encyclopedia, Adnan's brave sacrifice at Opium Hill is duly documented. Only problem? They all list him as 阿南上士 (Sergeant Adnan). Where are they getting this from, then? The source may lay closer to home.
In a Singapore book '和中学生谈历史 By 王振春' (Talking history with secondary school students) published by the Singapore Chinese Teachers Association, the author claims that Adnan was a sergeant when he fell in combat )page 21), but was promoted posthumously to second lieutenant by the British authorities. This is the only positive claim about Adnan's sergeant rank I could find online.
Who to trust? Liza Sahid's biography has a bibliography. 王振春's book on the other hand exists online only as a Google Book preview, and we can't see what his sources are or fairly evaluate his claim. What is without doubt is that there is now a widespread impression, reinforced by online Chinese sources of some standing, that Adnan was a sergeant at the time of his death. I think we owe it to the memory of Adnan Bin Saidi, as well as to ourselves, to set that record straight.
However if you search Singapore's WW2 history in Chinese, several sources like Chinese language Wiki and Baike, China's own internet encyclopedia, Adnan's brave sacrifice at Opium Hill is duly documented. Only problem? They all list him as 阿南上士 (Sergeant Adnan). Where are they getting this from, then? The source may lay closer to home.
In a Singapore book '和中学生谈历史 By 王振春' (Talking history with secondary school students) published by the Singapore Chinese Teachers Association, the author claims that Adnan was a sergeant when he fell in combat )page 21), but was promoted posthumously to second lieutenant by the British authorities. This is the only positive claim about Adnan's sergeant rank I could find online.
Who to trust? Liza Sahid's biography has a bibliography. 王振春's book on the other hand exists online only as a Google Book preview, and we can't see what his sources are or fairly evaluate his claim. What is without doubt is that there is now a widespread impression, reinforced by online Chinese sources of some standing, that Adnan was a sergeant at the time of his death. I think we owe it to the memory of Adnan Bin Saidi, as well as to ourselves, to set that record straight.