• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Czar Putin legislated new laws to fix Dotard & Ang Mohs all! Open Beer!

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.rt.com/news/428643-putin-counter-sanctions-us/

Putin signs law on countermeasures against US & its allies
Published time: 4 Jun, 2018 11:50 Edited time: 4 Jun, 2018 12:48
Get short URL
5b152bfcdda4c8761d8b464f.jpg

© Mikhael Klimentyev / Sputnik
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law stipulating implementation of counter-sanctions against the US and its allies.
The legislation is to be applied to any state or person for “hostile actions” against Russia. It allows Russian authorities to cut international cooperation with foreign states, and to impose import and export restrictions among other countermeasures. Trade embargos will not extended to certain goods, however, that are imported by Russian citizens for personal use.

Contrary to public fears, the countersanctions do not apply to imported essential items, for which no replacements are produced in Russia or other countries.

READ MORE: Russian economy resilient in face of latest US sanctions – Moody’s

The bill aimed at defending “economic interests and security” was drafted by State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin and the heads of all four parliamentary caucuses in mid-April. It was approved by Russian lawmakers by the end of May. The move came in retaliation to Washington’s economic penalties against Moscow.

In early April, the US Treasury included 24 Russians, including high-profile politicians, and 14 corporations on a sanctions list relating to alleged “malign activity around the globe.” The move has been repeatedly condemned by Russian authorities, with Moscow immediately promising to retaliate.
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
It will mean that anything that is outlawed or banned by Dotard is completely Lawful under Russian Laws. Russia will ship anything to Iran & NK Kim Jong Nuke etc, all of nuclear bio-chemical, strategic arms, missiles rockets, fuel, food, medicine etc. And Russian Military will Escort the Shipments, and open fire if Dotard or any moron try to intercept.
 

俺操汝地酿

Alfrescian
Loyal
Russia & USA replaying the history of 战国春秋, where "合纵"vs"连横" allies countermeasures against one another.









https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/合縱

合縱
维基百科,自由的百科全书
Jump to navigation Jump to search

建議此條目或章節與連橫 (外交策略)合縱連橫合并。(討論
合縱,或合從,合眾弱以攻一強[1]中國春秋時期戰國時期外交軍事策略,是南北縱向諸個國家合作,抵擋西邊秦國的東向發展。戰略上即使倡議諸國組成被動的聯合防禦陣線,依然不是長遠有效的方式。同時各國間存在著歷史的矛盾,攜手聯手防禦簡直是空談。合縱最主要的戰略創新則是從聯合抗秦,提升到合作攻秦滅秦。

根據《史記·蘇秦列傳》,蘇秦在遊說秦惠王連橫不成後,轉而遊說六國聯合起來對抗秦國。合縱之勢形成,蘇秦掌六國宰相印,然而各國之間也存在大小矛盾,蘇秦在齊國刺殺,合縱聯盟隨之瓦解。最後被连横所破解。在合縱抗秦基礎建立後,亦有合縱滅齊之舉。

目录
合縱攻秦
當時戰國七雄中秦國實力最强,嚴重威脅山東六國生存。一共有四次合縱攻秦戰爭

  1. 公孙衍倡导、楚怀王主盟的楚魏韩赵燕五国攻秦之战(前318年),秦軍勝;
  2. 孟尝君倡导、齐湣王主盟的齐魏韩三国攻秦之战(前296年),聯軍勝;
  3. 信陵君倡导的魏赵楚韩燕五国攻秦之战(前247年),聯軍勝;
  4. 赵国将军庞煖倡导的赵楚燕魏四国攻秦之战(前241年),秦軍勝。
合縱攻齊
合纵并不一定针对秦国:前288年,齐秦并称东西帝,苏秦劝齐湣王放弃帝号。前287年,赵国李兑、齐国苏秦倡导齐赵韩魏楚五国合纵抗秦,结果齐湣王出兵灭了宋国,引起列国的不满,将矛头转向齐国。前286年,燕韩赵魏秦五国合纵攻打齐国於濟西,齐国几乎灭亡。

評價
宋朝司馬光認為合縱有利六國,但六國並不睦愛,致使合縱失敗:

“臣光曰:從衡之說雖反覆百端,然大要合從者,六國之利也。昔先王建萬國,親諸侯,使之朝聘以相交,饗宴以相樂,會盟以相結者,無他,欲其同心戮力以保國家也。向使六國能以信義相親,則秦雖強暴,安得而亡之哉!夫三晉者,齊、楚之籓蔽;齊、楚者,三晉之根柢;形勢相資,表里相依。故以三晉而攻齊、楚,自絕其根柢也;以齊、楚而攻三晉,自撤其籓蔽也。安有撤其籓蔽以媚盜,曰「盜將愛我而不攻」,豈不悖哉!”[2]

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/連橫_(外交策略)

中文维基百科条目协作计划专页已建立,欢迎报名参与
[关闭]

連橫 (外交策略)
维基百科,自由的百科全书
Jump to navigation Jump to search
26px-Confusion_grey.svg.png

提示:本条目的主题不是連橫 (歷史學家)

建議此條目或章節與合縱合縱連橫合并。(討論
連橫,或連衡,為東周戰國時代以張儀為首的縱橫家秦國所提出的一種外交策略,指秦國聯合一些弱國進攻其他弱國,以破解當時公孫衍六國齐国楚国燕国韩国赵国魏国)所提出的合縱

名字源起


戰國時代,秦國位於西方,六國位於其東
连横一计,出自诸子百家中的纵横家。《s:韓非子/五蠹》:「從者,合眾弱以攻一強也;而衡者,事一強以攻眾弱也。」

“纵”与“横”的来历,据说是因“南北向”称为“纵”,“东西向”称为“横”。秦國位於西方,六國位於其東。六国结盟抗秦为南北向联合,故称“合纵”;六国分别与秦国结盟为东西向联合,故称“连横”。

目的與成效
秦國於戰國後期成為最大國,於是公孫衍提倡合縱,即六國聯合抵抗秦國。為此,張儀等縱橫家提倡連橫,指六國中的某幾個國家聯合秦國進攻其他國家,其目的有二:

  • 使六國不能團結一致
  • 造成六國彼此的內訌
秦憑着雄厚武力,利用此計收到實際的效益:瓦解六國的聯合。


https://www.zhihu.com/question/20466330

古代人所指的「合纵」和「连横」分别是什么意思?

关注者
97
被浏览
50,274
6 个回答


沈晓波

资深知乎助攻师 | 射技湿 | 巴萨球迷 | 金属党
字面意思上,合纵是南北纵向结盟,连横是东西横向结盟,战国中期时强国是齐秦东西两帝,这两个国家刚好是在横向的两头,其他国家是纵向分布,先有在公孙衍推动下,以楚国为纵约长的五国联军伐秦,结果联军溃败于函谷关,未能撼动秦国,后有以乐毅为统帅的五国伐齐,齐国则大伤元气进入秦国独强的时代。长平之战后六国齐黯,幸得之后以信陵君为统帅的五国联军大破秦军于河外,延缓了六国二十几年的气数。

策略上讲,合纵的核心是防止一家独大,保持均衡之势,连横的核心是避免全面树敌,各个击破,所以后期发展出范睢的“远交近攻”更精确的核心策略。
发布于 2012-09-07

陈甫鸼


编程 话题的优秀回答者
@沈晓波 君的回答很完善地解释了历史。我再补充一些细节。

合纵,合众弱以攻一强;连横,事一强以攻众弱。合纵之所以为纵,因为地图上看,合纵的经常成员国包括从北到南的赵、魏、韩、楚。而连横所以为横,则因为它的成员国通常为东西两端的秦和齐。但这格局并不是绝对的,下面会提到。

合纵和连横都是地缘政治构造联盟关系的一种体现。请看图(资料来自 Wikipedia: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ZH-战国七雄地图.jpg):

0a1b06ce13fd750854ab939c1050aac0_hd.jpg

战国七雄中,赵魏韩三国是三家分晋事件的产物。虽则三国行政上各自独立,但相互之间的联系依然紧密。另一方面,三国都和秦国接壤,也时时遭到秦国的蚕食,这是他们能够结成联盟的事实基础。楚国也是类似的。楚国的旧都,即郢都,离秦国距离较近,常常处在秦国的攻击范围之内,对秦国的侵略也有切肤之痛。这四国很容易走到一起。

反过来,秦国和齐国没有直接接壤,相应地也没有什么战争威胁。所以容易结为同盟。至于燕国,它常常是一个墙头草。它和秦国同样不曾接壤,但燕国和齐国争夺渤海湾的冲突导致燕齐无法齐心。燕国较弱,为了对抗齐国的压力,也由于苏秦起合纵于燕,合纵名单里经常有燕国,但它也和秦国保持过和亲关系,是秦国在连横政策中争取的对象。

上面这张图是公元前260年,即周赧王五十五年,秦昭襄王在位期间。秦已经成功向北吞并义渠并威胁赵国北方边境,而且灭了巴蜀两国,掌握了后方粮仓,甚至已经顺长江而下打下了郢都,逼迫楚国迁都寿春。这一年爆发了可能是战国时期规模最大的一场战役,即长平之战。这是范雎的远交近攻政策和苏秦的合纵政策相争的年代。

至于张仪的连横和公孙衍的合纵这一对对手,则需要上溯到更远一点,在秦国相对更加弱小的时期。那个时候秦国的争取对象甚至包括楚国。楚国相对封闭,且由于楚国有自立为王的历史,被中原各国讥笑为无文,所以楚国最初对合纵是并不那么热心的。如此才有《史记》里张仪骗楚怀王的那个经典段子和后来楚国的反复。这个局面一直持续到周慎靓王五年,即公元前316年,司马错、张仪灭巴蜀之后。从此秦楚两国进入直接对峙阶段。随之进行的秦楚丹阳、蓝田之战中,秦国和韩魏组成连横盟约,击败了楚国。从此楚国国力大减,完全倒向后来的合纵。
编辑于 2012-09-08


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/合縱

Vertical
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Merge-arrows.svg
It is suggested that this entry or section be merged with Lianheng (diplomatic strategy) and vertical integration. (discuss)
Incorporating vertical and horizontal, or communicative, and uniting the weak to attack one, [1], the diplomatic and military tactics of the Chinese Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period are the cooperation of the vertical and horizontal nations of the South and the North and the resistance to the eastward development of the Qin State in the west. Strategically, it is still not a long-term and effective way to advocate the formation of a passive joint defense frontier by all countries. At the same time, there are historical contradictions among countries, and joining hands in defense is simply empty talk. The main strategic innovation of the vertical integration is from the joint resistance to the Qin to the cooperation to attack the Qin and eliminate the Qin.

According to "Historical Records of Su Qin", after Su Qin had lobbied Qin Hui and Wang Lian failed, he instead lobbied the six nations to unite against Qin. With the formation of the vertical and horizontal situation, the six countries in the Soviet Union and the Soviet Union seized India and India. However, there are also contradictions between countries. Su Qin was assassinated in Qi State, and the Alliance Union collapsed. It was finally cracked by Lian Heng. After the establishment of the combined vertical and horizontal anti-imperial Qin basis, there was also a move to combine vertical and horizontal destruction.

table of Contents

1 combined vertical attack Qin
2 合纵攻 Qi
3 reviews
4 Related Item
5 See also

Combined vertical attack Qin
At that time, the strength of the Qin State in the Warring States Period was the strongest, seriously threatening the survival of the six countries in Shandong. A total of four combined vertical and horizontal attacks on the Qin War:

Gong Sunyan advocates Chu Wei and Han Zhao Yan, the main alliance of the Chu Huai Kingdom, attacked the Qin Dynasty (318 years ago), Qin Junsheng;
Meng Changjun advocated the victory of the Allied Forces in the Battle of Qin, Wei, and Qi in the Three Kingdoms of the Qiwang-King Alliance (the 296th year);
Jun Zhaojun advocated Wei Zhaochu Han Yan Five Kingdoms attacked the Qin War (the first 247 years), the coalition wins;
General Zhao Guozhao Pang warm advocate Zhao Chuyan Wei Siguo Qin warfare (former 241 years), Qin Junsheng.

Longitudinal
The vertical alignment does not necessarily aim at the Qin State: In the previous 288 years, Qi Qin also called the Emperor of the West and Su Qin encouraged the king of Qi to give up the emperor. In the previous 287 years, Zhao Guo Li Duan and Qi Guosu Qin advocated Qi Zhao Han and Wei Chu together and resisted the Qin Dynasty. As a result, Qi Yu Wang sent troops out of the Song Dynasty, causing dissatisfaction among the nations and turning his spearhead toward Qi. In the first 286 years, Yan Han, Zhao Wei, Qin and Five Kingdoms jointly attacked Qi State in Jixi, and Qi State almost died.

Evaluation
In the Song Dynasty, Sima Guang believed that it was in favor of the six countries, but the six countries did not love each other, resulting in the failure of vertical integration:

“Henguang Chen: Although the theory of counterpoints is repeated, even though it is important to be a follower, the interests of the six countries are also good. Former Wang built the nations, pro-states, made them meet each other, feasted with each other, the association In the absence of him, those who want to unite in their efforts to protect the country will also make the six countries able to be in a blind faithful relationship. Qi and Chu are the roots of the Three Jins, and the situation is matched by funds, and they are dependent on each other. Therefore, they attacked Qi and Chu with their own merits, and they had their roots. They also attacked the Three Jins with Qi and Chu. There is an apprehension that he has taken from him, and he will say, "The thief will love me without attacking him!" "[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/連橫_(外交策略)

The Chinese Wikipedia Project Collaboration Program page has been created. Welcome to register!
[shut down]

Lian Heng (Foreign Policy)
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Confusion grey.svg
Tip: The subject of this entry is not Lian Heng (historian).
Merge-arrows.svg
It is recommended that this entry or section be merged with vertical and horizontal links. (discuss)
Lian Heng, or Lian Heng, was a diplomatic strategy proposed by Zhang Zeng, headed by Zhang Yi during the Warring States Period in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty, to Qin Guoqin, referring to Qin Guojun’s alliance with weaker countries to attack other weak countries in order to solve the situation of Gong Sunyan’s turn to the six countries (Qi, Chu, Yan Guo, South Korea, Zhao Guo, and Wei Guo.

Origin of the name

In the Warring States Period, the Qin State was located in the West and the Six Kingdoms were located in the East.
Lian Hengyi, from among hundreds of family members. "s: Han Feizi / Wuyi": "From the followers, the weak will attack the strong one, but the scale will be stronger if the attack is weaker."

The origins of "longitudinal" and "horizontal" are said to be called "longitudinal" because of "south-north direction" and "horizontal" in "east-west direction". Qin State is located in the West, and the Six Kingdoms are located in the East. The alliance of the six countries against the Qin is a combination of North and South, so it is called "combination." The six countries and the Qin State formed an alliance between the East and the West, so they are called "Lian Heng."

Purpose and effectiveness
Qin Guo became the largest country in the late period of the Warring States period. Therefore, Gong Sunyan advocated integration, that is, the six countries jointly resisted the Qin State. To this end, Zhang Yi and other vertical and horizontal advocates advocate Lian Heng, referring to several countries in the six countries that have combined Qin to attack other countries. Their purposes are twofold:

To make the six nations unable to unite
Caused the guilt of each other in the six countries

With strong military force, Qin used this meter to receive real benefits: the collapse of the six-nation alliance.


Https://www.zhihu.com/question/20466330

What do the ancients mean by "combining verticality" and "lianheng"?
Followers
97
Browsed
50,274
6 answers
Shen Xiaobo
Shen Xiaobo
Senior Amateur Associate | Shooting Technique Wet | Barcelona Fans | Metal Party
Literally, the vertical and horizontal alliances are vertically and horizontally connected. The vertical and horizontal alliances are aligned horizontally between east and west. During the middle period of the Warring States, the strong countries were the two emperors of the Qin and Western dynasties. These two countries happened to be in two horizontal directions. Other countries were vertically distributed. Under the impetus of Yan, the five countries that used the State of Chu as the lengthy long-term coalition forces ploughed the Qin. As a result, the coalition defeated Hangu Pass and failed to incite Qin Guo. Afterwards, Leyi was the commander of the five countries and Qi was injured. The vitality entered the era of Qin's independence. After the battle of Changping, the six countries joined forces, and afterwards, the five-nation coalition forces with the command of the Mausoleum of the Five Kingdoms defeated the Qin Army out of the river, delaying the number of people in the six countries for 20 years.

In terms of strategy, the core of integration is to prevent the dominance of a single company and maintain a balanced trend. The core of Lianheng is to avoid full enemies and break through each, so later developed a more precise core strategy of Fan Li’s “outreach and near offensive”.
Posted on 2012-09-07
Chen Hao
Chen Hao
Excellent rep for programming topics
@Shen Xiaobo Jun's answer explains the history well. I will add some details.

Together vertical and horizontal, the weak is to attack one strong; even horizontal, one strong to attack the weak. The vertical alignment is vertical, because on the map, the vertical and horizontal member states include Zhao, Wei, Han and Chu from north to south. However, Lian Heng is horizontal, because its member states are usually Qin and Qi. But this pattern is not absolute, as mentioned below.

The combination of vertical and horizontal links is a manifestation of geopolitical alliances. Look at the map (data from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ZH - Warring States Qixiong map.jpg):

In the Seven Warring States period, Zhao Wei and Han Sanguo were the products of the three sub-jin events. Although the three countries are administratively independent, the links between them are still tight. On the other hand, all three countries are bordered by the Qin State, and they are sometimes eroded by the Qin State. This is the factual basis on which they can form an alliance. The State of Chu is similar. The old capital of the Chu State, namely the Suidu, was closer to the Qin State and often lies within the scope of Qin's attack. It also has pains to face the invasion of the Qin State. The four countries can easily come together.

In turn, Qin and Qi have no direct borders, and there is no corresponding war threat. Therefore, it is easy to become an alliance. As for Yan, it is often a wall of grass. It has never bordered on the same country as Qin. However, the conflict between Yan Guo and Qi Guo in the Bohai Gulf has caused Yan Qi to be unable to unite. Yan's country is weaker. In order to counter the pressure of Qi, but also because the Soviet Union began to cooperate with verticals, Yan often has the Yan state, but it also maintained a close relationship with Qin. It is Qin’s struggle for Lianheng’s policy. Object.

The above picture was in 260 BC, that is, Zhou Yuwang's fifty-five years, during which King Zhao Zhaoyi was in office. Qin has successfully annexed the north and annexed the canal and threatened Zhao’s northern border. He also destroyed the Pakistani and Pakistani countries, mastered the rear grain store, and even laid down the capital under the Yangtze River, forcing Chu to relocate the capital to Shouchun. This year broke out the battle that may be the largest in the Warring States Period, the Battle of Changping. This is the era when Fan Qi’s out-of-reach and near-offense policies compete with Su Qin’s co-integration policy.

As for Zhang Yi’s Lian Heng and Gong Sunyan’s combined vertical and horizontal opponents, they need to be traced back further, in the relatively weaker and weaker period of Qin. At that time, the target of the Qin State even included the State of Chu. The State of Chu was relatively closed, and because the history of the state of Chu itself was king, the Central Plains countries were ridiculed as having no text. Therefore, the Chu State was not enthusiastic at first. In this way, there was a repetition of the classic piece of Zhang Yi who deceived Chu Huai Wang in the "Historical Records" and the later Chu State. This situation continued until Zhou Shenyu's five years, that is, after 316 BC, Sima Biao and Zhang Yi killed the Bab. Since then, Qin and Chu have entered a phase of direct confrontation. In the battle between Qin and Danyang and Lantian, Qin Guo and Han Wei formed a covenant and even defeated Chu. Since then, Chu's national power has greatly diminished, and it has been completely lost to the later vertical integration.
Edited on 2012-09-08
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Russia 万岁...

https://www.rt.com/news/428643-putin-counter-sanctions-us/

Putin signs law on countermeasures against US & its allies
Published time: 4 Jun, 2018 11:50 Edited time: 4 Jun, 2018 12:48
Get short URL
5b152bfcdda4c8761d8b464f.jpg

© Mikhael Klimentyev / Sputnik
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law stipulating implementation of counter-sanctions against the US and its allies.
The legislation is to be applied to any state or person for “hostile actions” against Russia. It allows Russian authorities to cut international cooperation with foreign states, and to impose import and export restrictions among other countermeasures. Trade embargos will not extended to certain goods, however, that are imported by Russian citizens for personal use.

Contrary to public fears, the countersanctions do not apply to imported essential items, for which no replacements are produced in Russia or other countries.

READ MORE: Russian economy resilient in face of latest US sanctions – Moody’s

The bill aimed at defending “economic interests and security” was drafted by State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin and the heads of all four parliamentary caucuses in mid-April. It was approved by Russian lawmakers by the end of May. The move came in retaliation to Washington’s economic penalties against Moscow.

In early April, the US Treasury included 24 Russians, including high-profile politicians, and 14 corporations on a sanctions list relating to alleged “malign activity around the globe.” The move has been repeatedly condemned by Russian authorities, with Moscow immediately promising to retaliate.
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
Tsar Putin so power, axed and "U R Fired!" many Russian Generals.

Like no body's businesses.


http://www.pravdareport.com/news/russia/kremlin/06-04-2018/140633-putin_generals-0/

Source Pravda.Ru
06 Apr 2018 at 16:28
Putin sacks 11 generals
Russia » News from the Kremlin
On April 6, President Vladimir Putin dismissed eleven generals from the structures of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Penitentiary Service, the Ministry of Emergency Situations and the Investigative Committee. The relevant decree was published on the website of legal information.

27 comments 232 share
62286.jpeg


Putin's decree also contains new appointments. The reasons for personnel changes have not been named, RIA Novosti reports.

The following officials lost their positions:

Deputy Chief of the Main Directorate for ensuring traffic safety of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Major-General Pavel Bugaev;
Chief of the Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service, Major-General Andrei Bykov;
Chief of the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Major-General Alexander Guk;
Chief of the Academy of the State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, Colonel-General Shamsutdin Dagirov;
Head of the FSIN Department for the Udmurtia Republic, Colonel Vladimir Doronin;
Head of the Investigative Department of the Sverdlovsk Region, Lieutenant-General Valery Zadorin;
Head of the Investigative Department of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, Lieutenant-General Igor Napalkov;
Minister of Internal Affairs of the Udmurtia Republic, Major-General Alexander Pervukhin;
Head of the Investigative Department of the Criminal Investigation Department of the Penza region, Lieutenant-General Oleg Troshin;
Head of the Investigative Department in the Belgorod region, Major General Alexander Sergeyev;
Head of the Investigative Department of the Pskov region, Major-General Oleg Tushmalov;
Deputy Chief of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Volgograd Region, Major-General Vitaly Shevchenko.


https://polskanorge.com/2018/05/05/putin-sacks-five-interior-ministry-generals/

mai 5, 2018 / 0 comments
Putin sacks five Interior Ministry generals
03 May 2018 at 20:01
Putin sacks five Interior Ministry generals
Russia » News from the Kremlin

Vladimir Putin signed a decree to dismiss five generals of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Military District, as well as prosecutors of Udmurtia and the Tula region. Sixteen people received new jobs as part of personnel reshuffling.

62433.jpeg

President Putin signed the decree on personnel reshuffling at the Ministry for Internal Affairs, the Investigative Committee and prosecution authorities. The document dismissed five generals and two prosecutors.

In accordance with the decree, the heads of investigative departments of the Perm region and the Ryazan region, lieutenant general of justice Olga Zabbarova and Major General Vladimir Mahleidt, the head of the Central Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Perm region, Lieutenant-General Victor Koshelev, the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Murmansk region, Major Igor Batalov, and first deputy head of the forensic center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Major-General Ivan Lukin, were dismissed from their positions. Putin also fired deputy head of the Central Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the Krasnodar Territory, Colonel Yuri Kuznetsov.

Prosecutors of the Tula region and the Republic of Udmurtia, Alexander Kozlov and Sergey Panov, also lost their posts.

Previous mass personnel rotation at law enforcement agencies was carried out in early April, when eleven generals from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Ministry for Emergency Situations, the Investigative Committee and the Federal Penitentiary Service were fired, whereas 15 high-ranking officers received new posts.

A source at the central apparatus of the Ministry for Internal Affairs said that the personnel was reshuffled due to the fact that the generals reached the age of 60 and were «simply sent off to retirement.»


See more at http://www.pravdareport.com/news/ru...putin_generals-0/?utm_referrer=last_news_list



Share this:



http://www.sohu.com/a/234053725_626685?_f=index_chan10news_23


武器先生
1432文章
1.1亿总阅读
查看TA的文章>
0
  • 分享到


普京再次对强力部门“大动干戈” 6名将军丢官
2018-06-05 00:14 将军 /普京
179e34d57cb244579c876b67a493affb.jpeg


据《塔斯社》6月4日报道,俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京已将六名将军解职,相关信息已被发布在官方的法律信息门户网站上。

紧急情况部第一副部长弗拉基米尔·斯捷潘诺夫离职,接替的他是内务部上将亚历山大·丘普里扬。

普京还解除了克里米亚内务部部长谢尔盖·阿比索夫、克麦罗沃州紧急情况部部长亚历山大·马蒙托夫和调查委员会人事部负责人维克托·多尔真科的职务。

此外,克里米亚紧急情况部部长谢尔盖·沙霍夫中将和内务部财政经济政策司司长娜杰日达·罗马朔娃也被解职。

这是普京今年内第二次对强力部门“大动干戈”,此前,普京在4月7日解除了11名将军的职务,被解职者来自内务部、联邦处罚执行局、紧急情况部以及联邦侦查委员会,但并未公布具体原因。

据俄媒统计,如此规模的强力部门人事变动,在普京时代并不是稀奇之事。普京去年就曾三度“大动干戈”,共34名将领丢掉了乌纱帽。返回搜狐,查看更多

声明:该文观点仅代表作者本人,搜狐号系信息发布平台,搜狐仅提供信息存储空间服务。
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
SAF Bapok BGs are so safe here! CB! Out of SAF still can be CEO of GLC GRC Jiak Liao Bee! KNN! CCB!

PAP go fuck spiders!
 

yblzh

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.rt.com/news/428721-putin-shirtless-photos-nothing-hide/

‘I see no need to hide’: Putin on his shirtless pics that swept the Internet
Published time: 5 Jun, 2018 00:15 Edited time: 5 Jun, 2018 01:33
Get short URL
5b15e849dda4c80c0c8b463d.jpg

FILE PHOTO: Vladimir Putin rides a horse in southern Siberia's Tuva region August 3, 2009. © RIA Novosti/ Alexei Druzhinin / Reuters
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he sees no ill in those meme-triggering photos of him enjoying a day-off without his shirt on. There’s no deep meaning, it’s just that he has nothing to hide, Putin told Austrian TV.
The Kremlin-released photos of shirtless Putin taking a dip in icy waters, fishing in a mountain lake in Siberia, or that never-aging classic of him riding a horse, instantly became Internet sensations and sparked epic photoshop battles, that caused some to believe that the Russian President could have actually ridden a bear.

5b15d385dda4c84d0c8b462f.jpg

Russian President Vladimir Putin during a hunting and fishing trip in Siberia © Alexei Nikolsky / Reuters
While the western media keep going haywire every time they see a fresh batch of bare-chested Putin pics, with experts doing in-depth analyses of their impact on his image and electoral prospects, the Austrian journalist who has interviewed Putin ahead of his Vienna visit asked him about the “true story” behind what he called the “half-naked” photos of the Russian leader.

But Putin was having none of it, responding in his typical tongue-in-cheek style.

“You said ‘half-naked’ not ‘naked,’ thank God. When I am on vacation I see no need to hide behind the bushes, and there is nothing wrong with that,” he said.

While there’s hardly any other world leader that is getting asked this type of question on a regular basis, the pictures, however old, continue to stir the imagination of mainstream media, especially in the West. Just several months ago, NBC journalist Megyn Kelly asked the Russian President virtually the same.

“There are many photos of me at work, but no one cares about them. I’ve seen the pictures of me riding a bear, but I never did it. But such images do exist,” Putin answered then.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!
 
Top