Current White vs Past White

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/201...term-incompetence-and-long-term-incompetence/

If by now, you don’t get the analogy, the ‘vessel’ is the government establishment and the ‘driver’ is our government. The government we have now is nothing like the government we had in the 80’s – and this distinction is something the electorate needs to understand.

While it may have meant something once to have unfamiliar people wearing white easily replacing the more familiar ones wearing the same (i.e. an expectation of standards maintained over the transition), it is definitely not the case now. Wearing white alone no longer affords indication on the competency or capability – and it is truly sad that the ruling party has resorted to banking on the probability that the people will act on this habit of blindly accepting white-on-white replacement.

In GE2011, many were worried that their house values would drop and the economy would spiral downwards, among other bogeyman tales of fiction. So they did what they are most famous for – complain and complain until they reach the voting station, put a cross next to the lightning symbol, come out and continue to complain and complain.

They attended the opposition rallies, listened to the passionate individuals who stepped forward amidst the uncertainty and grumbled alongside the opposition supporters. But they chickened out when it really mattered – at the polling booth.

Perhaps four years ago at the last election, we could not be sure if the ‘vessel’ was damaged and the discussion revolved only around the best ‘driver’ to manage our journey. And we collectively chose to go with the current driver with the belief that a new driver was less able to manage this fine vessel. But today, we know that the vessel itself is being slowly damaged by the current driver – if not explicitly, then at least intuitively.
 
Jokes aside, five years on and this vessel is continuing to hold steady on its journey (to nowhere?). But the more important question is probably, is it still structurally sound for the long term? The continued failure of the public transport system may be one of the more visible indicators of this concern and it does appear as though our infrastructure as it stands will not be able to weather the lofty ideals of a ‘well-populated’ Singapore in the near future. Meanwhile, the assurances we have gotten from the government have been just that – assurances without any concrete follow-through.

The analogy used five years ago thus has to be updated, and while we appear to be a strong and sturdy vessel able to stay afloat, it appears we are structurally falling apart bit by bit. It is also apparent by now that the current driver does not quite have an idea where we are supposed to be heading or how we are going to get there. It is primarily relying on the fact that only it has the necessary working knowledge of how to manage this particular vessel, to justify that it is the only one qualified to drive.

But the reality is that the driver we have now is a far cry from the one who started off our current journey, a driver who worked the crew hard but knew clearly where it wanted to go and how to get there.

Unfortunately, the driver we now have is unilaterally focused on ensuring that no one else gets access to the control room or even learns about how the vessel itself is driven. This driver pretends to know what it is doing and is often seen busy maneuvering the vessel but achieves nothing but meaningless movement that is headed in no specific direction.
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/201...term-incompetence-and-long-term-incompetence/
 
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/201...term-incompetence-and-long-term-incompetence/

If by now, you don’t get the analogy, the ‘vessel’ is the government establishment and the ‘driver’ is our government. The government we have now is nothing like the government we had in the 80’s – and this distinction is something the electorate needs to understand.

While it may have meant something once to have unfamiliar people wearing white easily replacing the more familiar ones wearing the same (i.e. an expectation of standards maintained over the transition), it is definitely not the case now. Wearing white alone no longer affords indication on the competency or capability – and it is truly sad that the ruling party has resorted to banking on the probability that the people will act on this habit of blindly accepting white-on-white replacement.

In GE2011, many were worried that their house values would drop and the economy would spiral downwards, among other bogeyman tales of fiction. So they did what they are most famous for – complain and complain until they reach the voting station, put a cross next to the lightning symbol, come out and continue to complain and complain.

They attended the opposition rallies, listened to the passionate individuals who stepped forward amidst the uncertainty and grumbled alongside the opposition supporters. But they chickened out when it really mattered – at the polling booth.

Perhaps four years ago at the last election, we could not be sure if the ‘vessel’ was damaged and the discussion revolved only around the best ‘driver’ to manage our journey. And we collectively chose to go with the current driver with the belief that a new driver was less able to manage this fine vessel. But today, we know that the vessel itself is being slowly damaged by the current driver – if not explicitly, then at least intuitively.

This generalisation of SG is not accurate. SG voters are now savvy. Look at BE Hougang, BE PE and Presidential Election. I am comforted to know that SG voters are quite discerning,

Just be patient and wait for the next GE. PAP is in for a shock
 
Back
Top