Serious CPF Foils Dishonest Sinkie's Bid To Insurance Claim! The Liar Mischievously Concealed His Diabetes And Heart Disease From CPF!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
insurance--696x445.jpg


The family of a late taxi driver are distraught after the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board allegedly rejected the taxi driver’s widow’s Home Protection Scheme (HPS) on the basis that her late husband concealed his health condition prior to his passing.

Writing to the Chinese daily, Madam Li Yue shared that her husband, Mr Se Chun Hua, passed away five months ago from a fatal heart attack he suffered while he was ferrying a passenger on a trip in his taxi. Madam Li Yue said that her husband managed to park safely by the roadside, to ensure the safety of his passenger and other road users, even while he suffered from cardiac arrest.


The critically ill Mr Se Chun Hua was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at a local hospital where he received treatment for five days. His wife, however, had to make the difficult decision of removing life support because she feared that she and her husband do not have sufficient savings in their Medisave account to continue paying for medical bills.

Mr Se Chun Hua left behind his devoted wife and two children. His eldest daughter is a freshman at the Singapore University of Social Sciences’ School of Business. The 21-year-old has to fork out $4260 just for her school fees this year.

Scrambling to provide for her family after her husband’s passing, Madam Li Yue managed to borrow $5000 from a good friend but the money only lasted the family five months. This was when a Housing and Development Board (HDB) officer informed Madam Li Yue that she is eligible to make a HPS claim.

According to CPF Board’s website, HPS is “a mortgage-reducing insurance that protects members and their families against losing their HDB flat in the event of death, terminal illness or total permanent disability.”

If granted, the HPS claim would have been a huge source of financial assistance for the widow and her children since she could continue servicing her HDB flat loan.

CPF Board, however, rejected the widow’s claim. Madam Li Yue revealed that she received a letter from the Board allegedly stating their belief that her late husband had concealed his health condition since he did not inform the insurer of his pre-existing diabetes and heart disease conditions.

Mr Se Chun Hua had been paying hefty HPS premiums when he was alive. Last year, the late family man’s HPS premiums went up from $1100 to $1382.16 per annum. Madam Li Yue says that the CPF Board had only returned $269.46 from her husband’s unused HPS premium.

Revealing that her husband signed the HPS agreement five years ago, the widow argued that no one had explained the insurance policies to them and that no one requested her husband’s medical records. Asserting that they would have provided the records if the insurer requested it, Madam Li Yue said:

“The hospital has his records – thus it is obvious that we cannot hide anything [even if we tried]…My husband believe that the HPS is a form of financial protection from the government, and that was why he signed the agreement…Yet he is being accused of dishonesty even after he had passed away.”

Madam Li Yue pointed out that the insurer should only have made her husband pay premiums after requesting his medical records.

Madam Li Yue and her children are now left scrambling for another means to protect their home since CPF Board has rejected her claims application, after years of accepting premiums.

The disheartened widow also revealed that her taxi company that her husband drove for, TransCab, did not provide employee insurance. On top of this the company charged the family a “repair fee” since they were unable to find the cab’s key when the company wanted to take the taxi back:

“Not long after my husband passed away, the company sent a letter to us and informed they are taking back the taxi. However, as we were unable to find the key, they have charged us a “repair fee” with the amount of $25.58.”

Madam Li Yue lamented, “The cold rigidity and ruthlessness of the company in this situation had left me speechless.”

http://theindependent.sg/cpf-board-...sing-late-husband-of-hiding-health-condition/
 
I hope that people like JohnTan don’t make fun of other’s demise.

Because you and your family will never know what you are all going to get in the future :eek:
 
I praise the wife for making the right and better decision to let him go peacefully surrounded by family and friends instead of remaining alive and being a vegetable and being an additional burden to society. Such a policy is the best for the people and the society as a whole. Soylent Green is for People and Soylent Green all the way. However I also believe that policies need to be practiced if only Pinky ended old fart's life earlier. All in all the widow did the right thing and for such life policies there must be no restrictions. Diabetes and high blood pressure everyone will get and that should be covered.
 
Premium paid for 5 years..CPF take money song song...Comes to payout, a million excuses. Song bo 70%. Vote Liao Mai Comprain :D
 
It is a well known insurance practice to not pay out any monies if the insured had concealed any major illnesses in his health declaration.
 
It is a well known insurance practice to not pay out any monies if the insured had concealed any major illnesses in his health declaration.

Tis business very good for PAP, yet they still refuse to pay in full our Chee by Fund at 55 or 65.
 
It is a well known insurance practice to not pay out any monies if the insured had concealed any major illnesses in his health declaration.
Unlike other insurance options which are voluntary the HPS is compulsory and the insured must sign up even if he has STD or cancer. There was no way he could have opted out. The onus then is on CPF Board who made the scheme compulsory to send the insured for medical screening and have the premiums adjusted accordingly.
 
Unlike other insurance options which are voluntary the HPS is compulsory and the insured must sign up even if he has STD or cancer. There was no way he could have opted out. The onus then is on CPF Board who made the scheme compulsory to send the insured for medical screening and have the premiums adjusted accordingly.
So PAP'S CPF CHEATED THEM?!? OH DEAR...:eek::eek::eek:
 
Those CPF members who think they can receive their monthly payouts from 65 years old from CPF Life Plus Plan and the medical insurance coverage (at least Class C bed) from the new Care Shield will have to pray hard to God that they will not face any obstacles when they make their claims when due.U must remember,paying premiums is very easy but collecting claims is very difficult.
 
Comment from any legal eagles out there?
Conceal? If not asked? Inability to understand the completed forms? No explanation provided during completion of form?
Onus is on the insurer to ensure accuracy of information provided? Medical examination done?


Public display/verbalisation of unhappiness and continual public pressure will help?
Thank you.
 
Why comfort don't provide insurance and death benefits for their employees?even though they are self employed....only busy caring about collecting taxi rentals?

I mean our minister can get $8 heart bypass,shouldnt peasants get at least comparative coverage?
 
Back
Top