Covid vaccine trials led to birth defects and terminated pregnancies, FOIA requests show

[tobelightlight]

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-08-19-covid-vaccine-trials-birth-defects-lost-pregnancies.html

Another round of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests has been filled, this time for Moderna’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine,” revealing that the mRNA (messenger RNA) shot causes birth defects and spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

Towards the end of the 699-page document release in the toxicology section, it is stated that mRNA-1273, as the company calls the drug, lead to “significant increases in the number of F1 rats with 1 or more wavy ribs and 1 or more rib nodules.”

“Wavy ribs appeared in 6 fetuses and 4 litters with a fetal prevalence of 4.03% and a litter prevalence of 18.2%,” the section continues. “Rib nodules appeared in 5 of those 6 fetuses.” (Related: Pfizer’s covid injection is also linked to birth defects and infertility.)

While Moderna acknowledges the connection between these changes and its drug, the company claims that the structural changes observed in the bone structure of test rats “do not impact development or function of a developing embryo.”

“Maternal toxicity in the form of clinical observations was observed for 5 days following the last dose ([gestation day] 13), correlating with the most sensitive period for rib development in rats (GDs 14 to 17),” the company says.

All of this directly contradicts the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which in its authorization for “Spikevax,” another name for the Moderna shot, claimed that there was “no vaccine-related fetal malformations or variations and no adverse effect on postnatal development.”




Sasha Latypova, a former pharmaceutical executive with 25 years of experience in clinical trials and regulatory approvals, reviewed the documents and discovered the disparity between what Moderna’s clinical trials actually show and what the FDA claims about the drug.

More than half of all federally funded clinical trials are non-compliant with government guidelines​

It turns out that the results of many clinical trials are blatantly misinterpreted by government regulators – if they even get submitted to the government for review in the first place.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) says the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is failing to do its job by ensuring that drug and vaccine companies meet the necessary requirements for federally funded trials.

More than half of the 72 trials that were supposed to be submitted and posted to ClinicalTrials.gov in calendar year 2019 and 2020 were either never submitted at all (25) or were submitted late (12).

Further, half were conducted internally while the other half were conducted externally – the external ones having a worse compliance rate than NIH scientists.

Rather than deal appropriately with all this, the NIH “took limited enforcement action when there was noncompliance,” we are told. At the same time, the NIH continued to fund “new research of responsible parties that had not submitted the results of their completed clinical trials.”

What this means is that pertinent information about adverse events is not making its way through the appropriate channels, resulting in the FDA and other agencies issuing false information about questionable drugs and vaccines being “safe and effective.”

According to Stanford University medical professor Jay Bhattacharya, co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, negative trial results never get published in journals because of this.

“So when the NIH doesn’t follow the rule, essentially, it’s painting an incomplete, biased picture” of how taxpayer money is being spent and what it is supporting, Bhattacharya contends.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is also complicit in the racket, having most recently removed information from its website falsely claiming that mRNA spike proteins leave the body after just a few days. It turns out that they persist inside the body for a long time.

Want to learn more about the dangers and ineffectiveness of covid jabs? Visit VaccineInjuryNews.com.

Sources for this article include:

JustTheNews.com

NaturalNews.com

 

[laksaboy]

https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/ma...k-not-team-player.281828/page-29#post-3481497

 

[saynotomsm]

CDC confesses it LIED about dangers of covid vaccines to protect Big Pharma

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request has revealed that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been less than honest – to say the least – about Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines.”

The CDC lied when it claimed that it was actively monitoring the safety of Fauci Flu shots, calling it “the most intense safety monitoring efforts in U.S. history.” It turns out that the CDC did not even start looking at the injections until more than year after it initially claimed the surveillance had commenced.

“CDC has revisited several FOIA requests and as a result of its review CDC is issuing corrections,” a CDC spokeswoman told The Epoch Times, which filed a FOIA request back in July, when asked about this “error.”

That same spokeswoman claims that no CDC employee ever intentionally provided false information, nor was any false response given by the CDC in an attempt to sidestep FOIA reporting requirements.

Has the CDC ever even bothered to look at VAERS data?

The CDC supposedly set up a team to monitor post-injection rates of heart inflammation. That team was supposed to be analyzing the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to produce information for the public about this issue.

Not only did that team never conduct any abstractions or reports through October 2021, but the agency also insisted that “an association between myocarditis and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was not known at that time.”

“That statement is false,” says the Times‘ Zachary Stieber.

“Clinical trials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines detected neither myocarditis nor pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation. But by April 2021, the U.S. military was raising the alarm about post-vaccination heart inflammation, and by June 2021, the CDC was publicly acknowledging a link.”

Even after correcting its “mistake,” the CDC still failed to say whether or not its team ever bothered to even look at VAERS reports before the agency declared the shots to be “safe and effective.”

“In reference to myocarditis abstraction from VAERS reports – this process began in May 2021 and continues to this date,” the CDC spokeswoman wrote in an email correspondence to the Times.

Back in January 2021, the CDC promised to conduct a very specific type of data mining analysis on VAERS called proportional reporting ratio (PRR). According to an inquiry from Children’s Health Defense (CHD), the CDC has since revealed that “no PRRs were conducted by the CDC” and that data mining “is outside of the agency’s purview.”

Meanwhile, CDC VAERS team head Dr. John Su says the CDC did, in fact, start conducting PRRs in February 2021 “and continues to do so to date” – a claim that the rest of the CDC now refutes.

This fake federal agency just cannot seem to get its story straight. Nothing but lies seem to pour out of the mouths of CDC employees, none of whom seem to be on the same script.

The spokeswoman now claims that what CHD and the Times were told by higher-ups at the CDC was somehow “misinterpreted.” In other words, the CDC did not mean what it said and is now pretending as though it never said it.

The spokeswoman also claims that the CDC mistook “data mining” to refer only to empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining, which Josh Guetzkow, a senior lecturer at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, disputes.

“The notion that the CDC did not realize we were asking about PRRs but only data mining in general is simply not credible, since our FOIA request specifically mentioned PRRs and their response also mentioned that they did not do PRRs,” Guetzkow says. “They did not say ‘data mining in general.'”

 

[tobelightlight]

You need to be vaccinated so the economy can rise again.

Where is the economy when everyone is dead??? You will only have economy when there are living human beings.

 

[laksaboy]

You need to be vaccinated so the economy can rise again.

Where is the economy when everyone is dead??? You will only have economy when there are living human beings.

You see, these godless and soulless transhumanists fantasize about a post-human utopia where everything is managed by robots and A.I. And they need to cull most of the 'useless eaters' and keep their numbers down to a more 'sustainable' level. Easier to manage.

 

[tobelightlight]

You see, these godless and soulless transhumanists fantasize about a post-human utopia where everything is managed by robots and A.I. And they need to cull most of the 'useless eaters' and keep their numbers down to a more 'sustainable' level. Easier to manage.

Their transhuman plans will failed miserably. Med beds are coming. golden age is here. This whole vaccine drama is to wake people up. Only the awakened ones will take such steps to cure themselves and the sleeping ones will think those steps are crazy. Not sure if the sleeping ones will become half human/robot?